FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Rex

Rex

Started by hakwa2 REPLIES128 VIEWS· 16 Apr 2014, 15:40
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
16 Apr 2014, 15:40
#1
16 Apr 2014, 15:40#1

Rex is the oldest Roarer known to man. He saw the great ones: Clive Churchill, Gus Risman and Puig Aubert. And when I asked him the other day how the Wallabies could defeat the All Blacks, he winced.

“The only way we’ll beat them this year is if we tie their bootlaces together,” said Rex.

Why is he so gloomy about the Wallabies’ chances?

“I’ve been watching the S15 games live, here and in NZ, and on TV,” Rex began. “We’ve finished eight rounds in the comp, so I’ve had a good look at who’s who in New Zealand rugby this season.

“What I did then was make a list of the players Steve Hansen and the other selectors may well have pencilled in as possibles, probables and definites.

“Here’s my expanded list which is certain to differ from Steve’s as well as that of many people on this forum.

“In no particular order I have Jane, Lam, Perenara, J. Savea, C. Smith, A. Smith, B. Smith, Barrett, Manu, Fekitoa, Sopoaga, A.Taylor, Vito, Leiua, Ellis, Osborne, Hoeata, Ripia, Tameifuna, Anscombe, Freuan, Carter, McCaw, Dagg, Crotty, Crockett, Flynn, B. Franks, O. Franks, Read, T. Taylor, two Whitelocks, Afeaki, Cane, Cruden, Kerr-Barlow, Nanai-Williams, Messam, Retallick, Halai, Luatua, Nonu, Piutau, Faumuina, Woodcock. That’s 46 names in all.

“Now, before Roarers start screaming about so-and-so who could never ever be an All Black, perhaps because he’s not talented enough or couldn’t legally play for New Zealand, let me explain that I’m not suggesting all of them are quality enough to wear the black jersey.

“But I am suggesting that all of them are quality. And if you choose 15 guys from that list, you end up with 31 men who won’t make the run-on team but are, in my estimation, fine rugby players.

” However, when I try to make up a list of 46 quality Australian players, I have great trouble. Indeed, I doubt that a couple of the (probable) 15 Wallaby starters are of sufficient Test standard anyway. So much for relative depth.

“As for comparing the two probable starting teams, I believe the All Blacks will have a stronger scrum and more penetrative backs than we will. And when they play the Boks, I believe they’ll have faster forwards and, again, more penetrative backs.”

So there it is, folks, one man’s take.

Personally, I think we can do a little better against the All Blacks than Rex figures. But I’d feel more confident if we could do as he suggests and tie their bootlaces together.


Don't forget Rex, other ways incude having a blind rerferee controlling a certain 2007 RWC QTF Test (I'm looking at you Wayne Barnes ), or having a certain Suzie poisoning the whole ABs Team.

SH
ShezzaPro2,471 posts
16 Apr 2014, 16:20
#2
16 Apr 2014, 16:20#2
 "Don't forget Rex, other ways incude having a blind rerferee controlling a certain 2007 RWC QTF Test (I'm looking at you Wayne Barnes :angry:), or having a certain Suzie poisoning the whole ABs Team."
"Saffa's always blame the ref blah blah blah blah blah" - Sasuke

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
16 Apr 2014, 19:48
#3
16 Apr 2014, 19:48#3
i see shazaaaaaaaaaaaaa is still smarting from the ass whipping i gave him here
shazza, sarugby.coms julius malema

but thats still no excuse to carry on like this,,,



oh wait a minute, shazaaaaaa is a cheetah and a Bok supporter,  a crying little bitch as diva is very appropriate, carry on,
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news