Did you deliberately injure Brodie Retallick? I mean he was standing there at the ruck with his left chest and shoulder exposed and you took your opportunity. I hope you get a red card and a 6month ban from playing
RG Snyman you are clumsy
Sorry about the Retallick injury - but he is very frail lately and I do not think there will be a ban or even report.
Sorry about the Retallick injury - but he is very frail lately and I do not think there will be a ban or even report.
Dry your eyes Hacked Waugh even the commentators said no problem.
You don't want another Bismark /Dan tackle debacle.
Retardlick was unfortunately hurt. Happens when you play a tough side like the Boks.
You lucky you had wee Kwagga and Mostert playing otherwise it could have been worse.
Beeno
Kwagga was not too bad - Vermeulen, Steyn and Am was much worse.
Snyman must be careful - he made a stupid mistake today. In hi s previous tests he was also not the brightest spark on the field of play.
Snyman should be starting ahead of Lood and Mostert.
Animal!
Hopefully Retallik makes a recovery in time for the RWC.
I'm sure Hakwa and Beeno are sending thoughts and prayers.
Yes hopefully retardlick can play in RWC.
Don't want any excuses.
This is what Hanson said "The cleanout itself was technically OK, apart for the fact he was offside - he entered the ruck from the side of the ruck - but that's only a penalty."
Asked whether he thought Snyman should have been sighted, Hansen said "no no no, it's a big boys game".
So no cry baby there. Tell you what = Brodie has been messing with your lineout until then when you took him out ILLEGALY then with Brodie out your cheating hooking threw a crooked line-out throw for your try (I doubt Brodie would have caught it - it was was sooooo crooked it could have reached the Boks Fullback as 1st reciever
It was similar to the Mccaw play on Francios Louw, except Mccaw hit him after the ball had been cleared from the ruck.
Snyman ran about 10 metres to hit the ruck, so it was impossible he was offside. He did hit the ruck from the side, but that was because Retalick was competing for the ball on the side of the ruck. It was a small ruck with few players, so it possible to compete from the side.
This law of entering a ruck from the side only applies if you are offside, and then you have to go backwards onside, and then enter the ruck from behind the "eightman's feet". That is where the eight-man would be if it was a scrum.
Mcaw elbowed Louw without the ball, after the ruck had been cleared- and bumped Louw from the side and injured him.
The videos below show seperate incidents of Mccaw antics on Louw
There is nothing to suggest that RG was trying to hurt Retallick.
Sure Retallick was jumping against Etzebeth - who made his life easy.
moolaa
There is a rugby rule applied by all NZ supporters - don't touch McCaw or Dan Carter - anything attached to tackling or dealing in any other way with them is a mortal sin. Does the rule now shifted to Retallick as well?
It looked to me that the way he fell awkwardly on his elbow is what popped his shoulder.
Thoughts and prayers.
Xavi, his shoulder had dislocated before he hit the turf. And Sharkie and Denny, running from 10metres out and entering the ruck from the side is still illegal. Message to all RWC Refs 2019 -keep an eye on RG Snyman, he is a red card waiting to happen.
The Justice for Bakkies saga brings back memories when he was sent off for a cleanout where the British Lion prop was injured. After the game, the BI prop said it was fair play.
Retallack is the closest thing the All Blacks have to an enforcer, and without him, they have no mongrel.
Mccaw explains the breakdown , without his usual cheating tactics
They've come back to the field ever since the serial cheat retired.
Denny, I had to use an encryption decoder to try and workout what you just said...
But yes, since McCaw has retired, they have been normalised somewhat.
Him and Carter were the Aussie equivalent of Ponting and Warne in the same team.
mmm ja and it hasn't gone without notice but it's not worthy of a response, maybe I'm just too lazy or perhaps I couldn't be bothered, not sure, either way I couldn't be bothered dignifying weak attempts to stir from a complete bore.
@Sharkie look at where the ball is in relation to McCaw's hit on Louw - it was over the ball so no offside or from the side illegal hit there. Your video on McCaw proved what McCaw was trying to do ie the battle of the shoulders - trying to get his shoulder under Louw's shoulder except Louw's shoulders were upright. The 2nd video is an example of false news.
@Chippo I never said Snyman was not skillful - I said he was clumsy in his cleanout of Retallick given they are both professionals and play the game to earn a living. If players don't look after one another who else is going to? Sure, play hard but play fair and do not go out to deliberately to put someone out of taking part in a Tournement or out of a job.
I don't believe RG's intent was to injure anyone. It's a collision sport, not a contact sport. There is no such thing as a safe collision. RG simply did his duties, the consequence was unfortunate. Now, deliberately taking a player out would be the throat slam to Jantjes seconds before spear tackling Smit, ending his Tri Nations in game 1.
No Hawka. Retallack was competing for the ball, so he was cleaned out. Routine stuff.
The situation is that it was a small ruck, so there is no side.
Is no one supposed to contest Retalick? - If not, then he must be offside and should not have been trying to play the ball...
This law only applies when someone has run back from being offside, and they have to enter from the back of the ruck to get a return to onside.
From the side is also a 90% angle. Where Retalick entered the ruck would be considered from behind, not from the side.
If it was a big ruck (Lots of people) the only way someone could play the ball carrier, is by entering from the side. All their own players would be blocking the back of the ruck.
What no all praise and glory to your god for injuring BBBR hakwa?
Maybe you should blame him for not protecting him instead.


