RooiAAS about Hal 2006

You said this whole thing was a figment of my imagination.  Here are the results for the SH predicting contest in 2006.

Mozart 1/21

Rooinek 2/12

Bokshark opined:

"Well done Mozart on winning both sections of the comp. BBK didn't even post a final prediction, wallowing in his grief after the All Blacks lost. Wouldn't have made a difference as you called the game correctly anyway"

I think you should apologize old chap.

First off, Moffie, when I go to the Superbru site and click on tournament history, the drop down menu only goes back to 2007 . . . so if you're pasting 2006 results then one wonders whether you're sucking all this out of your thumb or whether you're so pathetically lame and lifeless that you copied and pasted this and kept it for 7 years! LMAO!

Secondly, predicting the 3N in 2006 would have entailed making what . . . a total of 9 predictions? Waaaaahahahahahaha! Just the 9? That's a lottery, Moffie. In the Super XV we make 125 predictions. It's a bit like you wanking on about winning a once-off T20 cricket match and pretending it's the same as winning a 5 match Test Series.

Thirdly, predicting match results isn't that big a deal to anyone. I know you're not the shiniest coin in the fountain but I'd expect even a dim bulb like you to have twigged that we have been talking about Fantasy Rugby for the past few weeks, not Superbru predictions. We pick players to score points based on real life performances, Moffie, not little thumb-sucks as to who will win. Wehe!

Finally . . . as if the above hasn't been embarrassing enough for you, Moffie . . . what does the "1/21" and "2/12" mean? If that means you came first out of twenty one while I came second of of twelve, that would indicate we were playing in different pools, wouldn't it . . . or is it not really a copy and paste at all and you . . . ummmm . . . typed the results wrong?

Waaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahaha! BUSTED!

You should have typed "2/21" if you wanted to make it look like a genuine copy and paste, Moffie. What a pathetic loser you are! That is truly hilarious! Anyone can type some rubbish up, put quotes around it and claim it's a genuine quote from 7 years ago . . . but only a truly stupid moron would go and make a typo that shows what a sad, pathetic and deceitful loser he is! Too funny for words!!!

Listen, chump, if it's really so important to you and you want to brag about beating me at a prediction pool . . . or even better, at picking a fantasy team . . . then it's very simple . . . just show some balls and enter!

Hahahahahaha!

PWNED!

Jal, check out this scumbag backtracking on the Mike post, its hilarious

Actually RooiAAS it was the test sequence in 2006 for the SH. There were 22 tests played including the lead up tests. We predicted them all. I knew you were going to jump on the 1/21 and 2/12 and give me an opening...thanks for that, I'll explain.

The Hal model predicted the result correctly in 21 of the 22 tests for a success ratio of 95.5%. You only entered 14 predictions, as did some of the other 46 participants, once it was clear they couldn't win. Your success ratio was 85.7%....about middle of the pack.

So you can take your "pawned" and "busted" and shove it.

Not only were you wrong initially, but your pathetic attempt to deflect has you looking like a complete idiot again. Imagine writing all that stuff, making all those allegations without having the facts. Which unfortunately for you, I do. How stupid are you really RooiAAS. Honestly this is all sooooo easy.

Wehe . . . how can I be sure this is you posting, Moffie, with all that egg dribbling down your crimson face?

B-U-S-T-E-D!

If it is in fact you, I can't help notice that you didn't even try to address some of the other salient points I made . . . for example, all this shrieking about a Superbru prediction pool from 7 years ago when we're actually talking about Fantasy Rugby.

I'll say it again, chump, why not stop all this silly boasting and this stream of bullshit and just enter?

(Watch the childish and cowardly old liar duck my challenge by claiming he doesn't have the time . . . when he spends 90% of his waking hours writing rubbish about Dave's height, Dave's weight, Dave's jacket, Dave's hair, Dave's job and even Dave's train ride! Hahahahahaha!)

Those aren't salient points....they are your points. Filler to divert attention from the basics, which are these:

All I told you was, after I won the only prediction contest I entered with the Hal model, I felt the approach was validated. You claimed it never happened.

I'm providing the evidence it did happen. And I'll admit I left the 1/21 and 2/12 out there as bait.

You might call it the Poisoned Pawn move .....waaaaaaaahahahahahaha. Game set and match!!!!!!

Oh I see . . . so it wasn't a barefaced lie, it was bait?

ROTFLMAO!

Moffie, I'm honestly feeling a bit embarrassed for you. Take some friendly advice . . . stay down!

PWNED!

Oh it wasn't a bare faced lie. It was right in Bokshark's posting. Was it deliberate? Well we'll never know, but the way things turned out it seems that way. After all it had you running off telling how many TN tests there were and how...I really got a chuckle out of this....we were in different pools.

But it was all as advertised ....a contest between 45 blokes including you.....and a little computer model I built called Hal.

Hal was the winner, leading me to believe all this predicting stuff could be programmed....momentum, travelling, defensive stats, offensive stats, quality of opponents etc. All grist for the Hal mill.

It's kind that you are feeling embarrassed, but I'd suggest you save it for the guy Hal thrashed.

Moffie lying again - no bloody way - I just don't believe it!!!!!!!!!!!

Well Denny, Beeno,  and  Rooinek were all in. Ask the first two guys.....the last one doesn't know if he is Arthur or Martha.

I should be asking Beenkop? - that would be no different to asking you!

On the contrary I have never asked anybody to lie for me. Nor have they. You on the other hand solicit your groupies becs and Rooiaas to do it all the time. Hell becs comes on here at one in the morning to help.

And today you were asking Bobok to correct the record, when he said he saw your bungalow.

I don't know if he did, or if he didn't. I suspect he may have just been pulling your chain. But there you were, soliciting help. I rely on fact, logic and debating tactics.....you rely on help.

.

The difference is Moffie, you have been exposed as a lair, I have never.

Bobbok was joking, but you are so desperate to hang onto that, that you now have it down as gospel.

When he does clarify the postion, my guess is that you will either accuse him of lying or better still, inform us that he was not posting at the time.

I see you have declared that Becs and Jal are liars, should we therefore also conclude that you feel the same about Mike

Mike wasn't around for much of the relevant period. Bobok was and he could have seen the posting. But if he didn't, I believe he didn't. RooiAas and Becs are proven liars, theres the diff. 

Oh dear . . . Moffie still squawking about everyone else being liars when his post above exposes his own deceit . . . and then he tries to pretend his barefaced lie was just "bait"?

Well Moffie, all I can say is you're a pretty good "baiter". One could say you are in fact a "Master Baiter"!

LMAO!

Not necessarily good, just good enough to hook you ....so you were in a different pool.....but now you were in no pool at all. Nope you tried to take on Hal and you lost.

Here you are, Moffie . . . Testrugby and Fox Sport FR games.

I challenge you to enter either one. You do know what a CHALLENGE is, don't you Moffie?

Put up, old man, or else shut up!

I'm betting you haven't got the balls . . . you're just a bag of wind.

And there it is . . . the deep dive!

Pfffffffffftttt! What a chicken!

No deep dive, I was just out for a little while. But no thanks, I don't get enough of  the games and frankly having done this stuff for the NFL,  I found it tedious.

Besides having thrashed you once, why repeat the experience.

Oh dear, we wouldn't want it to be tedious for you Moffie.

Tell you what, you stick to spending all your waking hours droning on and on endlessly about Dave's height, Dave's hair, Dave's job, Dave's jacket, Dave's odour, Dave's cottage, Dave's weight, Dave's son, Dave's commute, Dave's finances, Dave's posture, Dave's shoes and Dave's education and then, when you've run out of things to say about Dave, you can just repeat them all in case anyone missed anything . . . that way it won't be tedious for you, it'll just be tedious for the rest of us to read about your obsession with Dave all day every day.

Oh and you've never thrashed me at Fantasy Rugby, Moffie. That's another one of your barefaced lies. You played a minor predict-the-score competition once 7 years ago and you claim you won . . . even though the "evidence" you allegedly put was found to be another rather embarrassing lie . . . but the fact remains, you still haven't worked out the difference between a Superbru-type competition and a Fantasy Rugby competition.

Don't worry Moffie, I understand why you'd be too gutless to enter a competition where your points depend on player selections BEFORE the games instead of bullshitting AFTER the games. I know that Fantasy Rugby doesn't suit you deceitful and cheating nature . . . and it might also expose your hilarious ignorance when it comes to rugby and rating rugby players. I do understand. It's okay.

LMAO!

rooitwit could you please stop spoiling snapsters fun! He keeps the thread going about his weight, height and properties because he loves the attention. So much so that he rehashes it all on ss board. Can think why as the few ss oaks interested all read the posts here on a daily basis.  But ou snapster cant get enough of it!!   He is obsessed with himself    

Believe me nothing enthralls the vain ou snapster more than these subjects.  I still think Moz is overestimating snapster height.! I also think Moz over indulges the vain self aborbed snapster.

Fantasy rugby looks like a lot of time spent. Okay if one has it. 

By the way rooitwit talking of time, do you realise you are a coffin dodger? Time is marching on for you too. Think of Jan Ellis. Think of matter not being eternal, matter not being capble of making itself live. Think rooitwit think!!

So Beenkop you choose to dishonour Jan Ellis's name, a man who died of cancer, in a bid to insult a fellow poster.

There is no limit to how insensitive you are and what a pathetic scumbag you are. Kindly tell the board why you were kicked of the SS board - the stuff you said was disgusting about a very sensitive issue.

Cough up clown or stand to be exposed, you waste of space

I posted a message regarding Jan saying he was great Bok and RIP. I noted how time was not our friend.

I am simply reminding rooitwit that he too like all of us are coffin dodgers. Calling Moz a coffin dodger is fine but the point is we are all coffin dodgers. No insult in this instance just a reality which should not be ignored.

Your accusation, which your little gallery will love, is similar to what happend re that ss banning. There I sent a message of condolences to the folk of Canterbury. In a separate post I said I hoped the abs would be quaking in their boots. Two very separate matters.

So on both accounts you crash. Bwahhahahahahahahahaha Wake up you silly old dope!! Are you on valium or something!

Beenkop, you are just a low life liar, so why on earth should I believe your version of events that led to an outcry of disgust on the SS board - in your eyes it was innocent well, you hang onto that warped angle but in time, I'm going to reveal all

You know why, because you deserve it

Snapster please reveal all. I would love to see what lies were fed to the gullible. Gives me an opportunity to present the truth as I did to TC Fireman. Also explain why I was reinstated -why the outcry crashed.  Expect more poor science fiction but it should be most amusing.

But at the same time tell me about your plans to boycott ss board. Hahahahahahahahaha ou rooitwit dropped you in the dwang there. I am sure your big baas hawker is not pleased.

Beenkop, its a bit of a stretch telling us that everyone else was lying and that your version of the facts is in fact the truth - are you stupid enough to believe this.

Hey "Beankop" and "Snapster"

I know exactly why I was banned and also know why I was reinstated  - the mistake was rectified.  Bwahahahahhahaha  wher edoe sthatleav eou snapster.

I'd forgotten what a whimpering coward you were.

Al I genuinely dont recall your challenge - what was it? It was perhaps more important to you than me.