FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Rosko Specman: Bulls Kick and Chase Game Plan

Rosko Specman: Bulls Kick and Chase Game Plan

Started by sharkbok5 REPLIES366 VIEWS· 12 Jul 2019, 19:28
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,251 posts
12 Jul 2019, 19:28
#1
12 Jul 2019, 19:28#1


Rosko Specman: It was a blessing to be afforded the opportunity to play for a Super Rugby team and make my debut at the age of 29. The fact that it wasn’t the first time that I played the 15-man game made it much easier for me to switch codes. However, the most frustrating aspect for me was role of the wings at the Bulls. There weren’t a lot of times where the ball was spread wide to the wings, so every time when Cornal (Hendricks) and I got the ball, we would try to do something special because we never knew when we would get it again! The whole game plan around the wings was to kick-chase and put the opposition under pressure. It was frustrating for me because you never know when you are going to be in a move, whereas in Sevens I was the guy making the moves and decisions. I was happy with my debut against the Stormers at Loftus and the fact that I scored two tries. But, as the season progressed, opponents identified me as one of the more dangerous players on the field and tried to keep the ball away from me or close my space…  I finished with five tries for the season and, when I wasn’t dotting down I was keeping the opponents busy and Cornal was scoring tries. While we didn’t crack the play-offs, we are putting the correct processes in place. I believe the overall strength of our Super Rugby campaign was because our team was well-balanced. (even if the game plan was not). 

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
12 Jul 2019, 21:54
#2
12 Jul 2019, 21:54#2

He is right, the wing possession stats were down relative to the rest of the SA teams (Team Stats): 

Blindside Wing

  1. Bulls: 143
  2. Lions: 211
  3. Sharks: 134
  4. Stormers: 210
Openside Wing
  1. Bulls: 94
  2. Lions: 154
  3. Sharks: 148
  4. Stormers: 134
Aside from 14, the Bulls distributed the ball quite evenly. Even amongst the forwards. With the other sides, one can see clear tendencies to flow through particular players and/or positions. I think this contributed to the balance that Specman speaks of. The Stormers had a glut of ball at 11 and far more at 14, but were the worst attacking team in the competition - the Bulls nothing up 31 try assists to the Stormer's 19. The Stormers progressed several rounds without an assist. 

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,251 posts
12 Jul 2019, 21:57
#3
12 Jul 2019, 21:57#3
The Stormers seem like a team playing below their potential. Almost as if the backline was just introduced to each other 15 minutes before the match.
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
12 Jul 2019, 22:02
#4
12 Jul 2019, 22:02#4

The Stormers are accurate, far more so than the Sharks, but lack cutting edge in the midfield. They can be too linear, like the Aussies. Static phase play can become ridiculously predictable and stodgy. That said, even with some of the players I don't regard, they should still be playing much better. They have the tools to completely wipe out strong attacking sides, removing them from the game. In Leyds and Willemse they do have some x factor. 

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,251 posts
12 Jul 2019, 22:23
#5
12 Jul 2019, 22:23#5
The Sharks were mostly dependant on forwarding domination when they get their strong ball carriers running onto the ball at the front foot. The Diesel twins are good in this situation.When the breakdown battle is lost, the Sharks were hopeless, with the Diesel twins neutralised.
Robert Dupreez was poor to average most of the season. The Sharks only seemed like a thinking team with Bosch on the pitch. Most of his appearances in the first half of the tournament, we bench roles, 


AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
12 Jul 2019, 22:40
#6
12 Jul 2019, 22:40#6

Agreed, when they met a team who achieved parity in the collisions, the Shark's possession became very scrappy. Lots of forced passes, lots of loose balls in contact, turnovers, slow ball. Not a great ruck cleaning side. They struggle to control their possession and reset their phase play when their patterns break down. A lack of leadership. It's miraculous what the backs were able to do for much of the season. Robert du Pree z had the most influence according to RPI, but his attack stats were dreadful, Bosch was the opposite. I like the look of Schreuder and Bosch a lot more. 

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news