A well worked try by New Zealand. A long pass out by 9 to 13 who pulls towards 10 turns his back and switches with 22 who cuts in between 10 and 12. The goal being to obstruct 10 and send 22 through a gap. Jean however jumps the line and seizes upon 13 and alters course as he sees 22 coming onto the ball. This while JJ starts towards Dagg who is far out. Jean slips the tackle as he has committed himself to the line jump and is too far advanced to stop 22; JJ stops and scrambles at the sight of 22 coming through. Simultaneously Morné makes a move towards 22 as soon as Jean is beaten - he was covering the inside gap - but 22 pulls outwards towards JJ and thus cannot get a grip on him. JJ slips his tackle as 22 moves into hugging range, 22 is completely through Bok defence save for Kirchner who cuts across but only gets finger tips to him in a diving tackle. Kirchner was covering the outer-most attacker who was positioned directly beside the touchline.
1.There were two errors. Jean jumping too early created a dog-legged defensive line that left his channel wide open, creating the gap for 22 to attack.
2.JJ missing his tackle. 22 moved away from Morné and into JJ. Morné was unable to get a shot at bringing down or impeding 22. Whilst it is true that JJ had to come in to plug the gap, thus both he and Morné had to pull towards that area, it was JJ that actually had 22 well within range. His missed tackle was the break 22 needed to make a clear run for the line.
Rugby Championship 2013 - Barrett Try (Ellis Park)
No doubt Jean made a mental mistake here. But a competent tackle by JJ would have negated that. Morne simply shuffled Barrett laterally into JJ's arms. Theoretically he could have made the tackle, but it was an instant thing and he did well to block the gap in any case.
The point is, we know Jean can defend and while he may make a mistake like this again.....it's part of an aggressive defensive system. After JJs failure against Bosch this was in a sense a test of whether he can defend in space near his line. Once again he failed that test, and as a result we got Fury in the YE. Not my favourite, but in that situation Fury would have sealed off the gap....in part by being much flatter.
Sun Tzu
Was it necessary for Morne to slap Barrett on his back - wishing him well on his way to score the try? Don't try and say that an opposition flyhalf should in the first instance not be tackled by the flyhalf. Like in the case of all the tackles missed by Morne - this was just another complete hash by him. I blame both Morne and JJ for that try - they were equally amiss in the technique they used in that case.
I would have said that it could have been a one-off problem to have missed tackle stats of 36,36% in the Ellis Park test - but his average for the RC last year of 19,4% was maintained in the EOYT - where his missed tackle ratio was 20%
So lets accept that Morne has become a weak defender over the past year.
Mozart
With Steyn at 10 - they need not aim for anyone else - he is a defensive nightmare. They only need one channel to attack.
The Morne Steyn brigade of dodgy and mostly delusional rugby commentators are out in full. Discredit everyone else but St Morne is the icon of rugby. And then we must have De Jongh at center - he will only miss 23% of all attempted tackles. The more they miss - the happier this lot of clowns are.
I bet the NZ people would love to see Morne at 10 *they already do) and De Jongh at 13. They would regard that as a blessing to them based on stupidity of the part of so-called Springbok supporters.
Ceradyne
I will be civil this time - I will respond to facts properly - but verbal distortion of situations as attempted here - are not facts, but fiction concocted wilfully. The facts are clear for all to see. Morne Steyn made a feeble attempt to tackle Barrett going high and failed - JJ went high and he failed as well. The tackle attempts of both failed. To exonerate one and blame only the other is UTTER BULLSHIT - end of story
But the reason Morne would not have been fully committed to that tackle and never really in a position to align and effect the perfect tackle is because of the rush by Jean......any player who rushes the defensive line, immediately throws the defensive line out of sinc and if he does not make the tackle, creates uncertainty with those left in the broken defensive line.
Morne and JJ would have expected the rushing Jean to make the tackle..........and neither would have been in good positions to effect low hard tackles because of this.
Had Jean held his defensive line or not rushed.......no try would have been scored.
Steyn really should have made the tackle, no body rates Morne except his loyal supporters. In Wales nobody rates him, none of the Kiwi posters rate him and even his club don't rate him.
Let's see if you can do this. Convince us that it is indeed fiction concocted wilfully by indicating exactly where it is incorrect. I do not have much faith in that happening. I have seen you wriggle out of such a challenge before.
"To exonerate one and blame only the other is UTTER BULLSHIT - end of story "Isn't that exactly what you yourself are guilty of as well?
Had JJ been on Barretts inside and had Jean not made the rush......JJ would have made a routine tackle......something Morne should have done, but probably was offset by Jean's rush.
The commentators got it spot on.......they will know that it is always the responsibility of the inside defender to tackle the man with ball in hand......its rugby basics.....as the outside defender, you have to trust that your inside defender will make his tackle......Morne failed and JJ had to readjust and try make up for Morne's miss.......that does NOT constitute a routine tackle.......not even close
If Jean had held his line, he would have had to effect a routine tackle on Barrett and no try would have been scored.
Wardud I see you have come out of hiding to make another absurd comment. Morne's winning ratio over NZ is about 1o per cent higher than Bok teams without him....and undoubtedly the highest for any active flyhalf. Feeling stupid again?
Wrong, the last good attacking flyhalf we had in Honnibal......won 4 of 6 tests against the AB's........we need a true attacking 10 for the Boks........look no further than Goosen........Morne's record of 36% against the AB's is pathetic
Saffex
Mozart idolize Morne and will never admit that he was partly to blame for the Barrett try. Morne was according to him poorly placed to make the tackle and his feeble effort in doing so is minimized to the point of it never happened and this story about Morne successfully forcing Barrett to step outwards to avoid him is a feabrication to ensure that Morne gets off blameless.
After stepping De Villiers Barrett RAN STRAIGHT TO THE TRYLINE and only moved out slightly to brush off Morne's weak effort to tackle him.
Mozart
Wardad is stating a fact and that is they WANT Morne as SA flyhalf - because the AB's knows exactly what his weaknesses are and adjust their game accordingly. The Springboks cannot seem to beat New Zealand and one of the main reasons is the poor pe rformances of Morne over the past two years whenever they play New Zealand - the other being a totally unbalanced back row.
Mozart
Wardad is stating a fact and that is they WANT Morne as SA flyhalf - because the AB's knows exactly what his weaknesses are and adjust their game accordingly. The Springboks cannot seem to beat New Zealand and one of the main reasons is the poor pe rformances of Morne over the past two years whenever they play New Zealand - the other being a totally unbalanced back row.
Mozart
Please - I asked you before please check facts and remember by doing so you will end up lifting the toilet seat cover before you sit down for a natural disposal of human waste. This is a reminder once again - do lift the toilet cover before you sit down - the effect is always devastating for you and for the rest of the bathroom.
Duplication - sorry
Yes Saffex, Morné is the inside defender and who is he covering? Three forwards bunched together! And with 6 ready to clean-up should they decide to carry it up through their pod of forwards. Morné had a bigger issue to deal with than JJ who was marking one player out wide. But yes, I clearly stated that both players had to come in and mop up, the real issue is that out of Morné and JJ, JJ had the one and only opportnity to bring down Beauden. That right there is the point in case. Not only that, but Beauden ran away from Morné and towards JJ. It compounds matters even more.
There you have it, the All Blacks ran at Morné only twice. One other head-on tackle being as a secondary de fender after Retallick broke a tackle by Vermeulen. The rest? All covering tackles, clean up jobs; usually after two Boks were beaten and the attacker well advanced beyond the gainline. So clearly Michael's assertion that New Zealand target Morné is a lie. His assertion that Morné lost the Ellis Park test is a lie. His assertion that Morné is the weakest defender is a lie. I don't care what ant All Black fan thinks of Morné; Neither Henry nor Hansen take those claims seriously, and neither has bombarded Morné the way they do Lambie and Goosen. You don't even have the honesty or gratitude to acknowledge Morné's two try saving efforts - both chasing down attackers from behind! I can see you are losing your cool now that your shaky foundation of pseudo-fact is starting to give way, so I take it upon myself to drive home another nail.
And do note that note once have I ever stated that Morné is "so great". I'm merely presenting the truth, warts and all. It's now up to you to counter with something meaningful now that I have lifted the veil of your little 'numbers on a sheet' defence. I told you to back up those numbers with video references for context. No tackle stat can be full proof without video scrutiny to adjudge the context and quality of the tackle. I knew you wouldn't relent, and it was never my goal that you would. I merely wanted to press you for something more, and in that regard I am disappointed. If you really believe that numbers on a piece of paper are more conclusive than video evidenc then you are deluded. But, be that as it may, play it how you feel it if you can't think it.
Time Stamps
00:26 - Dagg runs at Jannie and beats him. Steyn covers across and grabs him. Dagg
gets the offload to 14.
10:30 - Morné brings down Retallick.
10:56 - New Zealand breakout down the touchline for a try. Read beats Alberts takes
contact from Habana but slips an offload to 14 who steps inside Eben and
darts for the try line; Morné cuts across field but can only manage to clasp
his shirt which isn't enough to stop him from behind.
24:41 - 14 charges into Morné who brings him to ground
25:19 - Nonu steps inside Morné into Jean. Morné got hands on him from behind.
25:30 - New Zealand on Bok tryline, Morné solitary defender on left of ruck; Retallick,
Messam and McCaw steadily drive him back and score try number two.
40:43 - Vermuelen is beaten by Retallick, Morné grabs his upper body and takes him
down.
53:58 - Savea breaks a Le Roux tackle down the touchline, Morné pursues and grab
him from behind taking his legs whilst Steenkamp thumps his upper body; both
bring him to ground a couple of feet in front of the tryline preventing a
certain try.
60:17 - 22 cuts past Jean and through a gap, Morné unable to get a grip on Beauden
as he pulls to JJ and breaks out for a try.
79:37 - New Zealand turnover, breakout down the touchline through Dagg. He pass
inside hitting 23 with a miss-pass. Morné dives and shackles him from behind
bringing him to ground and interrupting an attempted pass to McCaw, thus
preventing a certain try.
Sun Tsu
You say he made two try saving tackles - good for him if he did - but what about the 4 tackles he missed - two of them leading directly to tries.
That first try of the All Blacks - absolute Garbage - Smith ran straight through a weak tackle effort by Morne.
The stats on Morne for the Ellis Park test was as follows:-
I tried rather unsucc3essfully to reconcile your account with the above - please explain the differences.
Morne played no role in the first Messam try minute 25 - the one that should have stooped the try was useless Sloth Alberts - who instead of trying recover the ball from a tackled Aaron Smith - clumsily fell over his own feet.
Morne's idiotic decision making was the direct reason for Messam's second try.
1.They always run at Morné. Targeting him because he is a weak defender.
2.Morné cost us the Ellis Park test.
3.Goosen is a better defender than Morné
4.Goosen gets the backline going
All dead as a door nail. Mission accomplished. Goodbye.
Sun, Morne is covering no one other than Barrett.......the forwards were in front of the ball so he would not have been covering them.
Wrong Morne had every opportunity to tackle Barrett, he goes high........and with little conviction.......a result of the Jean miss which throws the defensive line.
It is the inside defenders (Morne) responsibility to tackle the ball carrier. The outside defender (JJ) is covering wide and would have trusted his inside defender to make the tackle.
However, we are not dealing with a routine tackle here.......we are dealing with a situation where the Jean rush has disrupted the defensive line and as you say.....both Morne and JJ were trying to mop up.........their initial attention and commitment was elsewhere as they would have expected Jean to make the hit.......both had to adjust last minute and try make the tackle........in the process neither were in a postion to effect a low hard tackle..........and this has been my point all along when it came to JJ's miss...........the miss was anything but a routine one on one tackle.


