FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Rugby Championship Boks: Little to lose by starting Willemse

Rugby Championship Boks: Little to lose by starting Willemse

Started by Beeno112 REPLIES450 VIEWS· 26 Aug 2018, 14:58
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
26 Aug 2018, 14:58
#1
26 Aug 2018, 14:58#1

Rob Houwing, Sport24 chief writer

Cape Town – If there really is no time like the present, then the Springboks should clear the way for young Damian Willemse to start at problematic flyhalf against Australia in the Rugby Championship at Brisbane in just under a fortnight.

READ: Rassie embarrassed by Bok defeat

Put it this way: the former Paul Roos wunderkind currently seems no less attractive an option than either Handre Pollard, the beleaguered incumbent, or ever-fickle Elton Jantjies for the pivotal berth after the Boks took a hefty torpedo-hit to the hull on Saturday in their quest for triumph -- or at least a lofty finish -- in this year’s tournament.

A salient feature of the unexpectedly clear-cut 32-19 reverse to Argentina in Mendoza was the now fairly experienced Pollard having a second personal stinker in a row against the moderate Pumas.

His place-kicking, especially, just seems all over the show at present and it has impacted other aspects of his armoury.

Clearly his confidence has taken a knock and whether he will be ready to suddenly put it all together again on the other side of the world against the Wallabies -- in an old hoodoo city for South African rugby -- is a matter for worrisome conjecture.

There are several selection dilemmas for coach Rassie Erasmus to grapple with ahead of the Brisbane date (the Boks trail 10-1 in post-isolation Test bragging rights there) but No 10, especially, has become a lot more fluid again than he and many supporters of the national team would like.

Erasmus seemed fully justified in retaining Pollard after the Durban game against the Pumas, on the reasonable expectation that the 24-year-old would atone for his blemishes, particularly off the tee.

But he was broadly erratic and indecisive again in Mendoza, despite certain redeeming features, and massively outplayed by his sublime opposite number Nicolas Sanchez.

The thorny issue for Erasmus is this: if he elects to recall Jantjies for Suncorp Stadium, it will look a little too much, to some observers, like a case of going “backwards” to (try to) go forward.

Lions stalwart Jantjies, after all, isn’t exactly oozing conviction himself after a handful of error-strewn Bok outings of his own in recent times – plus another stuttering performance on a big occasion when his franchise lost the Super Rugby final in Christchurch.

So with Bok stocks having tumbled markedly again, is there anything to lose by bringing a new dimension to the position in the form of hot-stepping Willemse?

An appealing aspect of the 20-year-old Stormers/WP player is that his trade certainly isn’t curtailed to “silky stuff”: he is physically equipped in a channel where there can be plenty of heat, given his respectable height and almost 90kg, and shown no lack of heart defensively at times when operating one tier down from Test rugby.

He also wouldn’t be tossed too remorselessly into the deep end against the Australians – an outfit similarly shrouded in fragility after successive whippings from the All Blacks – as he got just over quarter an hour of exposure off the bench in each of the Durban and Mendoza clashes for a valuable taste of Test combat.

If Erasmus wanted a bit of “security” alongside the rookie if he felt brave enough to start him, too, he should seriously contemplate shifting Pollard one slot wider to the inside centre role, where he is not a complete stranger.

The Bulls man usually makes his tackles sturdily enough, and having two renowned “footballers” alongside each other can be a pressure-reliever, mentally, for both parties.

Pollard could always be called into the flyhalf berth in certain situations, and Willemse has the natural talent to be more versatile than some may even imagine.

It is not as though No 12 is emphatically glued down for the Boks: Andre Esterhuizen did some solid enough donkeywork in the Mendoza near-nightmare but question marks will linger over his creative and spatial-awareness side of things …

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
26 Aug 2018, 15:02
#2
26 Aug 2018, 15:02#2

Willemse has some good moments, but he is nowhere near ready to be the starter. He is barely ready to be on the bench. Pollard must be retained. That is a no brainer. 

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
26 Aug 2018, 15:08
#3
26 Aug 2018, 15:08#3
Same old pattern of “thinking”, things go badly do pick some young promising 10 and throw him to the wolves. It wasn’t long ago bok fans were saying the same about a young bloke called Pollard. Coaches should show patience & develop Williemse.
PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
26 Aug 2018, 15:15
#4
26 Aug 2018, 15:15#4

Yep, don't know why we have such an obsession with replacing a guy after one sub-par game. Everyone was off the boil yesterday. Willemse can get a chance to start perhaps when Willie is unavailable for the home tests.

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
26 Aug 2018, 15:25
#5
26 Aug 2018, 15:25#5
We truly have the stupidest rugby press on the planet....little to lose except Willemse himself....Houwig should read the Gaffie files.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Aug 2018, 16:26
#6
26 Aug 2018, 16:26#6

So now Willemse is compared to Gaffie - what a load of BS from the two Morne supporters on site.   No flyhalf the last three decades was - other for kicking at goal - worse than Morne.  They would dream up BS to claim how wonderful Morne was and cover up for his BS performances.  

Obviously I think Houwing writes some real BS from time to time and when he does write something to support the delusion of Mozart and co - the latter is the first to splash his writings on site.

No - I do not think Pollard should go - he cannot perform with two centers outside of him with problem performances like he had yesterday.  But the logic is evident - blame Pollard and exonerate Esterhuizen and Ma and the loosies who are BS as well.

This obviously from the two BSters one of whom  - Mozart himself -  claimed as being the two top rugby analysts in the world;    What a lark.      

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
26 Aug 2018, 17:04
#7
26 Aug 2018, 17:04#7

Esterhuizen was one of the three best backs. Imagine poor Am left on an island outside Damian.

Please quote Mozart as saying he was one of the two top rugby analysts in the word. Lying again are we? How many is that today? 

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
26 Aug 2018, 17:24
#8
26 Aug 2018, 17:24#8

Howling Houwig is an idiot of note. Always has been, always will be.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Aug 2018, 18:08
#9
26 Aug 2018, 18:08#9

Mozart did when I asked for proof that came up with the BS he came up with iro of the Nono incident/  he wrote a flowing report how good he, Pakie and you are as rugby analysts for finding  something that nobody else om the rugby world came up with..  

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
26 Aug 2018, 20:17
#10
26 Aug 2018, 20:17#10

Personally i think Pollard is the deal and that the talented Willemse should get time off the bench and Start against weaker rugby nations.

Naas played test rugby at 22.

Watching the match i am surprised not more is made about how the Boks dominated the second half!

Bench players like Kitshof, Du Toit, Snyman, Louw changed everything. Very unlucky not to score more points.

There is a trend of starting badly. Kolisi is NO captain Warren far more inspiring!


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
26 Aug 2018, 20:28
#11
26 Aug 2018, 20:28#11
Pollard is our best option by a mile.
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
27 Aug 2018, 00:06
#12
27 Aug 2018, 00:06#12

In the first test the Boks used their forwards to suffocate the Pumas and wear them down. We didn't do that in the second test. From the very beginning the Boks were looking to throw it wide at every opportunity. It was a tactical error by Rassie. 

Pollard was excellent. Willemse is not going to better him. I can see it already. 

TH
TheTraditionalistPro4,003 posts
27 Aug 2018, 13:29
#13
27 Aug 2018, 13:29#13

There is nothing of a tactical mistake. SA players can not sustain the play style week in week out.

Forwards were out of their puff quickly enough in the game. The level of physicality required for SA to win is too demanding.

SA rugby keep failing to adopt a balanced approach to rugby, they are way too weak in other departments.

SA was not able of the high level of physicality they require to win. The rest can not compensate.

Good news is that AUS is not a physical side so there might be room.


— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news