ABABasquefan
Pro2,549 posts
16 Aug 2016, 20:55#2
not having the Foxsports fantasy (they had a Rugby Championship competition but they eliminated it), the SuperBru fantasy is the most interesting one, at least for me,...... why we don't have any pool in it?
17 Aug 2016, 01:26#3
... ABasque there is a Superbru comp /..see above for details
ABABasquefan
Pro2,549 posts
18 Aug 2016, 12:37#4
up with this
the SuperBru fantasy's pool name is also saruckersforum, no code is required
18 Aug 2016, 13:51#5
Just joined as Luke's Canes. Looks far better then the Fox Sports layout, impressed.
ABABasquefan
Pro2,549 posts
18 Aug 2016, 15:24#6
IMO it's the easiest layout and the easiest game,....... as there's no budget or player's value, it's very easy to choose your team,..... and you can choose all the players you like more,....... only limit is 6 players per team,.......
i like more the Foxsport but SuperBru is also very entertaining,..... you'll see
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
18 Aug 2016, 15:46#7
I used to criticise the SuperBru Fantasy format because I assumed that with no salary cap, everyone would choose the same players but it hasn't worked out like that. On the contrary, a game like Testrugby.com which has a salary cap almost forces people to choose the affordable players.
Not sure if you're playing the Testrugby game this year but mark my words, everyone who is playing will have Nathan Harris and Ruan Combrink in their teams because they're reasonably priced while all the other starters are over a FR$1m . . . so having player values doesn't necessarily create more diversity, it actually has the opposite effect.
ABABasquefan
Pro2,549 posts
19 Aug 2016, 11:55#8
rooi,
Nathan Harris has been ruled out,..... and he's been replaced with Codie T aylor who is not as cheap
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
19 Aug 2016, 11:59#9
Yes, just saw it. This is going to make everyone change again.
ABABasquefan
Pro2,549 posts
19 Aug 2016, 12:22#10
and is going to cause some problems also because as you said there are very few players with low price
the way Test-rugby value the players is quite awkward,..... the rookies are valued btwin 500.000 and 800.000 while the rest are btwin 1.100.000 and 1.200.000 (which is equivalent to say that except the rookies the rest have the same price),..... in the SR comp it's not a big problem coz there are may rookies to choose from but in the Rugby Championship, that's a problem,...
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
19 Aug 2016, 12:25#11
The only way to put together a decent team in this years Testrugby comp is to break two of the cardinal rules of Testrugby . . . you have to pick props instead of hookers as your Front Rowers and you have to pick scrumhalves instead of flyhalves as your Halves.