FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Rugby: Sam Whitelock given two match ban for striking; NZ Herald

Rugby: Sam Whitelock given two match ban for striking; NZ Herald

Started by Just_win4 REPLIES301 VIEWS· 01 May 2017, 18:15
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
01 May 2017, 18:15
#1
01 May 2017, 18:15#1

The Crusaders will be without Sam Whitelock for two games after the All Blacks lock was handed a two week suspension for striking.

Whitelock was yellow carded in the 71st minute in the Crusaders' 48-21 win over the Cheetahs in Bloemfontein, however the SANZAAR citing commissioner believed the strike was worthy of a red card.

After a detailed review of all the available evidence, the Judicial Committee upheld the citing, but noted that Whitelock's excellent disciplinary record reduced his suspension.

"The Judicial Committee deemed the act of foul play merited a mid range entry point of four weeks due to the World Rugby stipulation that a strike to the head shall result in at least a mid range entry point sanction. However, taking into account mitigating factors including the fact that the player had an excellent disciplinary record including 110 Super Rugby games for the Crusaders and 84 test caps for the All Blacks, the Judicial Committee reduced the otherwise applicable sanction from four weeks to two weeks."

The suspension of Whitelock, who had been captaining the Crusaders, will leave a leadership void in the team, with fellow All Black Kieran Read also sidelined due to injury.

The Crusaders meet the Bulls in Pretoria this weekend, while Whitelock will also miss the Crusaders' important Kiwi derby against the Hurricanes the week after.

Jamie-Jerry Taulagi of the Sunwolves also recieved a suspension, being banned for five weeks after a dangerous tackle on Chiefs back Shaun Stevenson.

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
01 May 2017, 18:19
#2
01 May 2017, 18:19#2
 Whitelock will be missed for sure, especially against the Canes. Once again kiwis get a tough but fair ruling
More seriously, strange that Whitelock retaliated as he normally doesn't. ABs are taught to let the ref make the calls but in this case he saw red - so to speak .
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
01 May 2017, 18:31
#3
01 May 2017, 18:31#3
 That was a clear red, but obviously the TMO and ref did not have the balls to red a prominent Allblack.
BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
01 May 2017, 22:51
#4
01 May 2017, 22:51#4
 ..Draad you could also question why the player that blatantly tackled Whitelock mid air got off scott free...was it because the ref and the TMO did not have the balls to card a prominent ret@ rd..
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
02 May 2017, 04:38
#5
02 May 2017, 04:38#5
 Probably Brycie.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news