Running lines hurt the Stormers....

What a load of baloney again.   Normally Mozart hates it when some  Mallett quotes are mentioned on this site - now suddenly he mentioned one.

Obviously one has to evaluate that Mallett statement on the basis of Viljoen's stats.  He is credited  with a try assist when he beats the plodder Kerevi and the latter ended up on the ground trying to hang on to the shirt of Viljoen, which the latter shaked off with ease.

Viljoen carried the ball 9 times for a gain of 44 meters.   In the process he made 1 line break beating two defenders,   Problem is that Viljoen is probably the foremost straight-running center in SA by all who have seen him playing regularly.    

You were hallucinating about ball carries and now suddenly Viljoen is fat -  what a farce.  

He is the ideal weight for an  athlete that height stooge - 15 kgs lighter than Fat Fransie and will  beat the latter by 30 meters over a 100 meter race.  

Mozart

I use proven information - not imagined info like you do.   Take for instance the double lies you come up with as to Viljoen.   The official stats indicate that Viljoen is not fat and the one try he scored in the Blues game prove he is not a carthorse as alleged by you.   The prove - Engelbrecht picked up the ball when a Blues player knocked the ball on in the Stormers  22 and a full speed chase ensued.  When Engelbrecht eventually got caught in the Blues 22 - who was there to receive his pass?   Your alleged carthorse.

Your statement on Stander and Alberts is also indicative of you living in fools paradise.   First of all Stander was always a better, pacier  and more hardworking loosie with double the work rate of the useless  Alberts.   Nobody who knows anything about loosie play will confirm that Alberts was the slowest loosie ever playing for the Springboks and a poor tackler as well - remember the way he missed a tackle on Read in the AB test in 2013 for instance.   He also never ever protected and recovered  breakdown balls even when he standing next to the tackled Smith in that same test - so clumsy he fell over his own feet instead.    Both those incidents in the s ame test resulted in tries being scored and a test loss by the Springboks.  Just two e4xmples of  a player who should never have been a Springbok.

As to Matfield - ask yourself  why other real Springbok locks do not rate him and ask why Bakkies referred ironically to Matfield when saying he was not always standing around in the backline.    Matfield - other than in line-outs was a real loss in actual tight 5 play.   That is one reason why Meyer had to select a carthorse like Alberts who could in theory made  up for the deficient  Matfield in Tight 5 play.    There were positives in some aspects of play of Matfield - but on the whole Matfield became worse after his return to play tests in 2014 when he was a dead loss.     

Listen keep on lying - but remember people know you by now as being totally against the truth.   Maybe you think the truth is too valuable  to be abused by using it too frequently.       However, three lies in one comment  is stretching it a lot.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

Mozrt

At 192 cm and weighing 100 kgs VIljoen can never be classified as "fat"  - the ideal weight for a sportsman  that height would be 103 to 105 kgs.   When being 194 cm the ideal weight is between 105 and 107 kgs.   Your hero Fransie weighed 118 kgs up to 2016 - but he may be down to 112 kgs - which still means he even now carries a lot of lard.   Hence the description of him as Fat Fransie.  

I would now deal with the try against the Blues since Eng elbrecht passed the ball to Viljoen -  there were only four players on the scene  - the tackler of Engelbrecht and another Blues player - Engelbrecht after being tackled  passed the ball to Viljoen and he brushed off the tackle attempt by the only Blues defender and scored the try.   If he was as slow as you made him out to be - he would not keep up with the speed of Engelbrecht and the Blues defenders.

It would be better if you look at issues objectively and do not use deception on this site.      

Don't worry Mike most players are fat by Moz standards, except Fransie and people are like Saffex.

Balls - he scored the try - keep to the truth for a change.    How could he otherwise and stop  your lie about his  weight.    You are getting tiresome with all  your misrepresentations.   I can't keep   up correcting your continues lies.

Anybody believing the above BS must be ignorant as Mozart is in  the game of rugby   

Fact is nobody can believe anything you wrote above,   You refer to stats - the only stats provided above was provided by me - yet you ignore \those.   Then when caught out you describe a myth according to which it would have been impossible for Viljoen to score the try he did score.

You can live with your  lies - you seems to believe in it - very few would in fact not realize that an ything you write about your pet hate players are total garbage devoid of any truth            

Mozart

It is virtually impossible to discuss anything with you - I gave the facts (inclusive of stats) and you persist with your fabrications.     

Listen - if Viljoen was where you said he was he would not have been able to score the try.  The second Blues chaser did try to tackle Viljoem - but he brushed him off.  

Those are facts so your fabrication  is BS In capital letters.   

No need to because you lie about Viljoen being Fat to start off/ to  -  stupid.

Mozart

Are you dumb or not or are lies just part and parcel of your normal conduct.  

Viljoen may be 104 kgs - but that is within the weight list for sportsmen as accepted on medical grounds.   This list was published on site in 2013 when the debate on Fat Fransie erupted. The latter is 194 cm in height and weighed 118 kgs at the time.

Steyn was required by Plumtree in 2013 to reduce his weight to as near as possible to the level of 105 to 107 kgs as possible,   He never did so in the period 2013 to 2015 and some reduction was allegedly made since to 112 kgs - which is still 5 to 7 kgs overweight.  He fully deserve the  designation as Fat Fransie - Viljoen is not fat at all.   Nobody would ever forget that pic of Fransie with his huge stomach bulging  over the top of his short pants taken after an injury in 2015.

You could go to your quack and if he is worth his salt he will give you the list - should be no problem with the overweight Americans being in the majority.   However,  you should in fact  apologize for lies you spread on this site in this case,    

By the way this reminds me of the BS you published on site as to "the thin wrists, thin shoulders and long neck" of Du Toit and the pace assessment of various players you do not like.  Total BS and lies at best resulting from prejudice.   The latter pet hates apparently is standard  with you.  One day when I have time I will publish  your pet hates list - as well as the list of proven non-performing dud players you always punted,    The first list is very long - the second just a bit shorter.   

Listen - this has nothing to do with your academic achievements and everything to do with rugby.  You make seriously defective posts on this site - things that even an idiot could see is rubbish - and then end up with responses you do not like.  Fact is I admire your academic and professional achievements - but you have serious deficiencies in rugby evaluation    Anyway I am sorry I insulted you in the way I did.

Your story about Viljoen is just one of many - they all stem from prejudice and your continuous search for something you can find to criticize your pet hate players.   Lets take the Viljoen "fat" myth.   I told you years ago (in the discussion about Fat Fransie0 that the doctors have a schedule of best weight categories depending on height and that have a bearing on potential fitness and sporting achievements,

When I pointed it out to you in the case of Viljoen you insisted on your imagined belief.   I then really challenge you to get that list from your quack - he is bound to have it - and look at the weight recommended iro  in respect of people with the height of 193 cm and Fat Franie at 194 cm.   There obviously is not a big difference between what the two should weigh - but Fransie at one stage was between 13 and 11 kgs over the limit and Viljoen is just about the right schedule weight and medically not fat.

You obviously are welcome to write what you think about rugby - but then you should stick to proven facts please.  Stay away from constantly trying to find dubious faults with performance .of your pet hate players - it really is not giving a positive image about you. 

Then why did you not use it and made unfounded allegations?

Fook, but this is funny as hell! EW a fatty! Fransie a world class 10?....or both of them world beaters...or both sh!t...my head hurts...well, my jawline actually...and my stomach muscles...this is hilarious!!