SA team of the Week

What a joke....both Steyn who was dominant, and Potgieter were way better than Goosen. And by the way Alberts was the starting point for a lot of the Sharks success.and how did Malherbe make it when the Stormers scrum was their one weakness?
Hogwash hey OOm? 

Mozart
You are exteremely prejudiced and I pointed out the problems the players had and where they performed well.   Mt assessment  was based on the actual performances of the players in all aspects of the game.  I know you rate goal kicking as the only function of a flyhalf.    
Subsequnetly I also consulted the stats and I will quote those for you:-
 Steyn0/01710/10/112203035/20/010/0
Potgieter0/02013/9/52601026/00/000/0

Goosen0/01612/13/103903216/01/000/0

Goosen was better in ball carries and better in beating defenders and off-loads and he caused less turnovers than the other two.  Steyn also gave away away a penalty. Potgieters defence was OK - Steyn's was poor.  His team was not the strongest and never controlled the match, like the Bulls and Sharks did.
I think that anybody who rates Alberts as remotely useful in games must have their heads read.  I had a good hard look at him and his contribution was slightly better than last week.   I do not rate  a loosie who missed as many tackles as he did.
Alberts0/000/1/81101017/20/010/0
Alberts has had a missed tackle ratio of 22,2%  His 8 carries entail a total meter gain of 11 meters - and he beat only one defender.  He lost the ball once and fabe away a penalty as well.   His carries started off nothing - but another maul - so what he produced was bog ordinary to poor.   His defense is seriously problematic.   In three games he made 15 tackles and missed 4  - miss tackle ratio  21.05.  The number of tackles made was poor compared to other 7's and the missed tackle ratio three times higher.  
As to Malherbe I looked at all the games and the other 3 tighthead props were by f ar poorer than Malherbe.  I will be civil and ask you which one you regard as better - incidentally the worst one earliest subbed was in fact Jannie du Plessis.and Werner Kruger was not much better.    

    

The simplest metric with fly halves is.....did they see their team to victory before being subbed. Fransie was way more assured, assertive  and effective than Goosen....end of story. In any case most of Goosens metres came through open field, when he ultimately didn't take up the challenge to sprint for the line.
Jannie scrummies way better than Malherbe.
And Alberts had his finger prints on two Sharks tries.

 I will not respond to further silliness and stupidity other than to say a food player make space for himself and others.    
And Jannie's scrumming against the local provincal scrummagers was going on the back foot often enough and getting subbed early because he was not up to standard - end of story. If you did not see that - you missed 75% of the game.  

 "You are exteremely prejudiced" - CleverMike

 Sun Tzu
I am not prejudiced - I deal in facts not hallucination.  And now you fo and pee and try and clear our brain from it - it makes you hallucinate badly.   

 "I deal in facts not hallucination"

Hallucinations, you mean like video footage which is a vulgar distortion of the facts? Sure.