yeah right! i just dont get some you people. under meyer we have only lost 3 of our last 22 tests! he now has a 75% win ration which sets him in 4th place over jake, peter, mallet and anyone that matters. we are scoring tries to boot! so why all the neg surrounding him. i hate to be a ahole but most of our fans are dumbazzed mudafuggas!
Sack Meyer
3 loses in 22 tests, read em nd weep like little sissy saggex
A score is not the only part of the story......
The 2 Losses and 2 draws in 7 games. Alters the picture a bit. Why would you skew the facts like that?
BTW, I'm not too worried about the Boks under Meyer.
Sorry - but in 29 tests under Meyer the results were as follows:-
Wins - 22Losses - 5Draws - 2
That represents the following :
Wins - 75,86%Draws - 6.9%Losses - 17,44%
I think the unease of some site members are that too many of our wins were marginal and by less than 7 points - in other words the results could have gone the way of the opposition. This year alone 3 of the 5 wins fell in that category and that against teams rated must lower than the Spribngboks. That set the alarm bells ringing.
Obviously Meyer is under pressure and further losses this year is going to add to the pressure. In analyzing the situation objectively - the selection of too many older players without regard to actual performances adds to the pressure and I think that Meyer should rather change the team after the RC and start afresh.
If he keeps the present team and loses tests this year - he will be under serious pressure indeed. At this stage though I would say there is no real need for his replacement - but things can change towards the end of the RC though.
waddaya wanna know lady becsy-cat?
Accep ted - but there are big hurdles ahead and a fuirther 4 losses in the RC wll show a slide in performances and would be suicidal.
yeah just like you said we were going to lose all our games last year? yeah i heard all about it boet you hate south africa just admit it!
"I apologise for probing whether gonzou is Card"
Why is it that important to you and Draad, Gonzo the Bonzo is no mole, he contributes on a regular basis unlike lazy me and he is fun to read. We can do with some fun, afterall, there's some stereotypes around who make for dull reading. Furthermore, he
doesn't pretend to know rugby ....he KNOWS rugby.
You go Gonz!
PS, why was it so important to you to unmask Jalapeno as Rooinek?
But to be fair ou gonzou makes a point or two.
Well Draad, most of us get carried away at times....and I do plead guilty. As for our Gonzo , well the matured man that he is can mix it with the best and I'm sure whatever you said didn't cause him any loss of sleep and there'd be no hard feelings.
Der u go, Denny the peacemaker
CYA...it's zzzz time here.
Looov da Proteas!!
But we will survive of course with the appropriate equipment.
A list like that does not tell the whole picture, now does it ?
Bozo.......its more about how useless the Boks have been since the EOYT, where we sneaked past the likes of Ireland, Scotland and France. We then start this year with what should have been a loss to Wales and two pathetic performances against the Argies.
This all co-insides with clueless Meyer's recall of all the old farts and we are on track to lose all 4 tests against Oz and NZ.......so what do you say to that clueless Bozo
I'd sack Meyer now if I was in charge......the guy is clearly out of touch at every level
Status: Bok regular
Posts: 752 RE: Sack Meyer
August 28, 2014, 13:54:11 Just want some context to the win/losses.
A list like that does not tell the whole picture, now does it ?
There you go. In order of merit:
Steve Hansen
Played 33
Wins 30 90.9%
Losses 1 3.0%
Draws 2 6.1%
Heyneke Meyer
Played 29
Wins 22 75.9%
Losses 5 17.2%
Draws 2 6.9%
Stuart Lancaster
Played 30
Wins 18 60.0%
Losses 11 36.7%
Draws 1 3.3%
Ewan McKenzie
Played 17
Wins 9 52.9%
Losses 7 41.2%
Draws 1 5.9%


