FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Saffex...an angry man

Saffex...an angry man

Started by generaltit22 REPLIES575 VIEWS· 08 Mar 2013, 08:16
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
08 Mar 2013, 08:16
#1
08 Mar 2013, 08:16#1

Saffex all your self-appointed expertise in rugby is tainted with your lack of objectivity and poor anger management...as I mentioned before in light hearted jest a bout or 2 with Dr Phil might help...lol

But all this changed when you had malevolent wishes on a young player who chooses to play his rugby away from the false deception and delusion of a promised rainbow land which if we are honest we know it is exactly that. You sit in England and spout your anger about patriotism...another delusion.

Some wise advice...

Whoever restrains his words has knowledge, and he who has a cool spirit is a man of understanding. Even a fool who keeps silent is considered wise; when he closes his lips, he is deemed intelligent.

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
08 Mar 2013, 08:36
#2
08 Mar 2013, 08:36#2

Amen!! And that is the final word Saffex!

 

I must admit, I trap Saffex at every turn, pip him at every post and all the rest as its just far too easy but your piece is genius. You call him out on life in general, not just rugby and it is a perfect summary of the man. I enjoy reading Mikes responses to Saffex too because with very little words at times, he gets Saff to "blow up", become abusive and then that overtakes the rugby talk as 100% of the time, Mike is correct and Saffex tries to steer away from the topic at hand as he has been exposed. With so many words you could have used in the title : Saffex.. A....man, you chose angry and that is perfect.

 

He is an angry little man. Angry at us, angry at coaches, angry at players, angry at his appearance and weight, angry that he was not blessed with a fully functional brain... Dr Phil could definately help him bring some inner peace. As for rugby knowledge though, that is probably never going to happen until he opens his mind to others thoughts and starts learning from guys like us on this board! ;-)

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
08 Mar 2013, 12:59
#3
08 Mar 2013, 12:59#3

Seb, get this into your stupid head, I dont need any advice from a wanker like you. Shove it up your arse as they say.

 

As for any young player turning their backs on SA rugby - may they be blessed with no future in rugby.

 

Take it or leave and hey shut the door on your way out you waste of space

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
08 Mar 2013, 13:05
#4
08 Mar 2013, 13:05#4

Stringbean do you get a kick out of making a complete idiot of yourself. I slap you to the ground at every turn and you start your post above telling us how you trap and pip me.......but best of all apparently bright Mike has my number.....bwhaaahaaaa

 

Got to love that pipping me on Hougaard not starting this weekend and hey dont forget that Cheetahs flanker......bwhaaahaaa

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
08 Mar 2013, 14:43
#5
08 Mar 2013, 14:43#5

 Dave, I can guarantee you that everyone will agree with me over you. On anything. Every post I point out your short comings with proof. You then go on to take the conversation back to starting point and keep repeating yourself thinking you have "stumped" me yet you do that because you cant back up what you say. Why is it that we all feel the same about you Dave? Is it all of us or could it be you that is the common denominator?

Hougaard..Yep, the man is injured. So injured that he takes his place in the match day squad. Get real Dave. You are either injured or you are fit to play. No half measures. Take a guess which one Hougaard is?? Can you explain to me why the medical staff and coaches would risk their "star" half back for the entire season for the sake of 1 game? You more delusional than I thought. Hougaard is good to go. Guaranteed!

 

Yep I will remember that Cheetahs flank. As should you. Maybe you can remember Frans Venter on the wing??

 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
08 Mar 2013, 15:00
#6
08 Mar 2013, 15:00#6

Stringbean, what I love about you is that you dont realise how stupid you are.

 

Hell we get a writer telling us Hougaard has a ankle strain and you effectively tell us he is lying - are you really that stupid?

 

You have yet to point out anything that counters anything I have ever said, purely because you speak a load of shit, but more importantly your rugby ignorance keeps getting exposed everytime you open your stupid gob.

 

Habana at 13, Labascagne ahead of Botha or Deysel in week 3, Hougaard not injured - you cant say stuff like this and expect to be taken seriously.

 

How can you make ignorant statements like this and then claim to be a challenge to me - get real dumbass - my 15 year old would tear your stupidity to threads.

 

Now what are your thoughts on Schalk Burger at 13?

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
08 Mar 2013, 15:17
#7
08 Mar 2013, 15:17#7

 Oh so Dave now we believe journalists and the press. Guess what Dave, 50 journalists say Oscar Pistorius knew it was Reeva. 50 say he didnt..Who should we believe??

 

Dont expect us to bow down to a rugby writer. They hype things up when needed and tone it down when needed. They report information they are told and as I said, news out of the Bulls camp will be "the injury" because its less hassle than having to say the man has been relogated to the bench due to Vermaak looking better in his half a game!

 

Dave, let me ask you something..Why is it that we can all see Hougaard has been below par as well as Steyn but you are alone in thinking they have been good??

BO
BonganiPClub Pro229 posts
08 Mar 2013, 15:29
#8
08 Mar 2013, 15:29#8

Boklogic

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 520
RE: Saffex...an angry man
March 08, 2013, 13:17:17

 Oh so Dave now we believe journalists and the press. Guess what Dave, 50 journalists say Oscar Pistorius knew it was Reeva. 50 say he didnt..Who should we believe??

 

 

Maybe we should not believe the Bulls themselves either..........

www.bluebulls.co.za/article.aspx

Jano Vermaak also earns a first start this season in place of Francois Hougaard, with the latter playing off the bench. Hougaard is struggling with an ankle strain.

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
08 Mar 2013, 15:34
#9
08 Mar 2013, 15:34#9

 Keyword..Struggling...The man is "struggling" yet he is named in the team. Struggling implies that he is not fit enough to play and struggling to get ready. He has not been bracketed.

 

I have no doubt that journalist got his info direct from the Bulls. I also have no doubt that the Bulls dont want to answer questions on who they prefer at 9 right now. Genius really. Perfect timing for this "struggle!"

 

Lets just put this topic to bed until we see Hougaard on Sunday. We will know then how he is really doing. I am going to watch him in the warm up at the stadium. Guaranteed he will be running and box kicking!

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
08 Mar 2013, 15:37
#10
08 Mar 2013, 15:37#10

Oh what bullshit, a writer has no need in the world to inform us that Hougaard, Chiliboy and Kruger are slightly injured when they are not - you are clutching at straws and making your name mud in the process.

 

My call is that Hougaard has been the best SA 9 in the S15 thus far, this is confirmed by 5 rugby writers. Same applies to Frans at 12, where he has been even more domineering than his competitors for the 12 spot - hell one has to ask whether the likes of Olivier, Ebersohn and de Allende have actually even taken the field given how ineffective they have been to date.

 

Hougaard has an ankle strain - a writer has said as much - your counter to this is weak, no in fact its pathetic

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
08 Mar 2013, 15:42
#11
08 Mar 2013, 15:42#11

 Come Sunday we shall see...

 

what has Steyn done that you can make that comment. He has scored the same amount of tries as the other 12's..He has just run a whole lot less metres and passed fewer balls. Totally ineffective. I need him to be better this weekend

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
08 Mar 2013, 15:54
#12
08 Mar 2013, 15:54#12

Bongani, this ignorant twit just does not know when to shut up. I mean there is stupid and then you have Stringbean telling us that now the Bulls website is also speaking crap about Hougaard's ankle strain.

 

Could you dig a deeper hole for yourself.

 

Stringbean......man up and just apologise for getting it wrong about Hougaard's injury and we can put this one to bed and move on from exposing your stupidity any further.

 

Alternatively keep going and I will keep burying you

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
08 Mar 2013, 15:54
#13
08 Mar 2013, 15:54#13

Hey hands off snaspter he is only do what he does best!  Great poster all in all. He has hs blind spots but who besides me doesnt!    

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
08 Mar 2013, 15:57
#14
08 Mar 2013, 15:57#14

 Saffex, for u to bury me you would not to dig yourself up..You were buried along time ago. I may be in a hole but sand is yet to cover me. Come Sunday we will know. If Hougaard looks fit, im right! No one that is struggling with an ankle strain can run properly nevermind step and shit!

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
08 Mar 2013, 15:59
#15
08 Mar 2013, 15:59#15

Stringbean, Frans in his first match showed exactly what we need from a Bok 12 - it was SBW stuff. Two mini breaks and offloads to support runners - it was perfect.

 

His physicality at 12 has no peers in SA......he has massive presence and the only player able to take contact and offload with accuracy. When he takes contact, he gains metres, when he tackles he dominates.

 

The other 12's to date have done nothing

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
08 Mar 2013, 16:06
#16
08 Mar 2013, 16:06#16

 Yeah but then why are his outside backs not scoring more tries? SBW creates tries. Frans is breaking down way too easily!

BE
becsPro4,378 posts
08 Mar 2013, 16:27
#17
08 Mar 2013, 16:27#17

No Professional Rugby player takes the field at 100% fit....a Rugby expert such as yourself, Boklogic, should know this.

And an ankle strain can mean many things...slight bruising/tweaked ligamant/swollen Achilles etc etc etc. A few injections into the site would make most players capable of stepping/running pretty well if required.

Your theory seems incorrect.

 

GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
08 Mar 2013, 16:28
#18
08 Mar 2013, 16:28#18

Suffering Saffex...stop throwing  red herrings around...it is ok for guys to constructively disagree on player selections but it is another thing to call them useless...some of the things you say might have some sense but your bitter tone always taints every argument.

I agree with you that Francois Steyn and Hougaard have huge talent but also do agree with Mike and others that their game has not been up to expectations or even standard. But you go from the sublime to the ridiculous...Burger @ 13...Habana @ 13 might work ( I do not agree as well) but this is not stupid.

Neither are the oldest internationals...Bunce,Thorn and Ackermann useless (another post).

Lighten up mate and make peace with yourself, smell the flowers, watch the bees and the elephants and be a good boy and eat your onions and enjoy the rugby this weekend.

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
08 Mar 2013, 16:34
#19
08 Mar 2013, 16:34#19

becs, calling ShockLogic a rugby expert might be pushing it.

 

We know he's an expert at making internet threats, we know he's an expert zit-popper and we know he's an expert when it comes to running down his adopted country . . . but I've yet to see anything from the angry little chap to suggest he knows even the basic fundamentals of rugby.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
08 Mar 2013, 16:37
#20
08 Mar 2013, 16:37#20

Ja Rooi, I am shitting myself this end.......big bad Boglog is going to moer me. The best was him offering to pick me up from the airport, where he would give me a hiding

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
08 Mar 2013, 16:40
#21
08 Mar 2013, 16:40#21

"Boglog"! I like it! Hope he doesn't hunt me down and punch me if I use it in future!

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
08 Mar 2013, 16:40
#22
08 Mar 2013, 16:40#22

Stringbean, a little rugby lesson......the Sharks outside backs are scoring tries, last I checked they had only played 2 games and Mvovo has a try.

 

But as much as I never agree with Sharkbok, he was right in agreeing with me that Jordaan is falling short in running support lines of Frans.......the man has gone awol and needs to get in tune with his 12.......something SBW's support runners were very good at

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
09 Mar 2013, 00:37
#23
09 Mar 2013, 00:37#23

 Becs and Rooinek, no one is interested in your support of Saffex.. Its to be expected. Have you played rugby on an injured ankle before Becs..Have you tried to step at full pace on an injured ankle. My advice to you is next time you twist your ankle taking the roast out the oven, try inject some of your magical stuff into it and carry on. See how you go.. These men are taking hits all game long, using their feet every second. An ankle is not like a back strain or calf strain, you wont play with a fuckd ankle. Did you watch what happened to Dan Coles for Hurricanes last night when he "strained" his ankle. He tried to go on but stood up and could not walk even after being strapped up..He was off..Night over! Hey Becs, why dont you post something in support of Dave's manly features again or maybe support his theory on Frans Venter on the wing and Elephants and Onions.. You forgot to add your 2 cents of support there.

 

Rooinek, never anything to add in a rugby sense but will make sure his girlfriend Dave is never exposed. Rooinek, I dont need to even entertain your shit. When I joined SA rugby, within 5 posts from other posters I had a pretty good idea of what was thought of you and your standing here. You and Dave are certainly "respected" members of this board. Only difference is at least Dave "tries" to add some rugby talk no matter how fuckd up it is.

All this fighting started when I said to Dave, you have met so many ppl from this board but I bet when you see them face to face you are this meek little mouse but over the net you are this broad shouldered superman who has never lost a fight. Thats exactly true. I let him know that he should try talking to people how he does over here in person and see how he gets on. He has told me many times that I am no match for him so dont call me out on it and leave your mate looking like roses. It is childish yes but its a fact...If i met Dave, the way I know him as a person now, i would drop that prick with half a slap...Telling me last night he has never lost a fight..Ha ha is he fighting his 15 year olds again?

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news