FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Saffex id there is one player in the Protea team

Saffex id there is one player in the Protea team

Started by clevermike5 REPLIES152 VIEWS· 20 Feb 2014, 14:46
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
20 Feb 2014, 14:46
#1
20 Feb 2014, 14:46#1

that should amongst others get the boot it is Graeme Smith,  Against even half-decent bowling he fails all the time - because of a seriously flawed batting technique.


I think it is time to move on and get rid also of Alviro Petersen.  Unlike you I have no problem with Faf and Elgar is doing just fine. I think that if we had a half decent opening pair - we will find that the rest of the batting line up will come through as well.


Smith is OK against a weak attack - useless against a strong one.


We are indeed lucky - he is not in the OFI or T20 squads - so time to move on the same way in test cricket.   


 

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
20 Feb 2014, 21:56
#2
20 Feb 2014, 21:56#2
 Mike, sorry to burst your bubble, but a flawed technique does not get you almost 10 000 runs at an average of almost 50. Being opener and captain as well makes it all the more phenomenal.  All batsman goes through a dip of form or a lack of runs some time. Amla is in the same boat ATM. Do you want to drop him as well? Graeme is the best captain in world cricket ATM with no apparent replacement at this time. He has more backbone than the rest of the team combined. Please stop flaunting your ignorance.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
20 Feb 2014, 22:12
#3
20 Feb 2014, 22:12#3
 Smith is getting on. Dro p him down the order to 6.
Get rid of the ever failimng Duming. He is reaching last chance saloon. How long does one wait? Its a bit like snapsters infatuation with Hougaard.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
21 Feb 2014, 02:04
#4
21 Feb 2014, 02:04#4

 Dddraad


A flawed technique can be over-looked at a younger age when reaction and hand-eye co-ordination are better, but that wears off as time goes by and the older players get - the more difficult it becomes against top bowlers. 


I was a great Smith supporter - but the mere fact that he fails far more frequently than he succeeds is becoming a serious problem.  


Simultaneously a low scoring failing opener - puts the whole rest of the batting line-up under pressure.   And Smith cannot bat lower in the order - he cannot play spin bowling well enough.


Incidentally the issue does count and Smith is not really in line for the shorter version of the fame in particular.  

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
21 Feb 2014, 03:08
#5
21 Feb 2014, 03:08#5
Smith has always had a batting flaw....so does Faf, so does Amla and de kok is hardly Classical, starting with his stance. The point is, does he function as an opener and captain. I'd say there is little doubt on the captaincy  score. Batting wise, he played a poor shot today....but his dismissals in the first test were unlucky. So no selectors would be willing to act yet....he is here for the series, let's see how he goes in the next few innings.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
21 Feb 2014, 03:33
#6
21 Feb 2014, 03:33#6

Mozart


My problem is - how many poor shots does Smith in fact play?  Far too many and that is why I have question marks about his role as an opener.   The problem is not his technical flaws in batting - in younger players those flaws are minimised  by better hand-eye co-ordination and better reflect action - the older you get, the more pronounced those flaws become.  


Amla had flaws in batting but he worked on it and it is much less of a factor now than it was before.   De Kock does not have a problem technique -wise,   He has had a problem today by playing a rash shot thinking he could score easy runs from a part time bowler.   That is hardly likely to happen again.   If I have a choice as to who should face the Aussie quickies between Smith and De Kock - the end result will always be De Kock even at this early stage of his career.      

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news