FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Sanele Nohamba - 64kg @ 5'4 Four

Sanele Nohamba - 64kg @ 5'4 Four

Started by sharkbok3 REPLIES1,479 VIEWS· 02 Sept 2019, 04:03
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
sharkbok
sharkbok
Captain23,249 posts
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,249 posts
02 Sept 2019, 04:03
#1
02 Sept 2019, 04:03#1
A mini-me. Is he the smallest player in World Rugby? He looks good though, very quick at the base of the ruck. 
There is certainly more depth of black players in more positions than ever before, giving the SuperRugby and Boks teams a larger talent pool to choose from. 


BE
Beeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
02 Sept 2019, 10:11
#2
02 Sept 2019, 10:11#2

Yes indeed but are they merit selections. Our Supr Rugby level just keep dropping. Likewise the once hugely respected Currie is now very poor.

Rassie is a genius for getting the Boks to look reasonable. 

SA
Saffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Sept 2019, 11:44
#3
02 Sept 2019, 11:44#3
Beenkop not only are you a bigoted homophobic twat you are also a racist - fuck me is there any substance to you? The ironic thing is you are all this in the name of religion If ever there was an advert against Christianity it’s you - you serve your God so well - keep up the good work Beenkop he must be proud of you!!! Luckily for you, you keep proving he does not exist for if he did you would not be mouthing the bigoted bile you do
sharkbok
sharkbok
Captain23,249 posts
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,249 posts
02 Sept 2019, 21:19
#4
02 Sept 2019, 21:19#4

When I said depth, I meant merit selections, in all positions. 

Lomu at 120KG was almost double the weight of Sanele Nohambe. That huge Crusaders wing about 4 years ago, was around 130kg and double his weight.  

No way Nohambe could do a front-on tackle of a bigger backline player, he would have to use his speed and tackle from the side or behind and trip up the ball carrier.


— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news