SARU and the decisions that would alter nothing

The following from News24:-
" The General Council of SA Rugby on Friday took a number of ground-breaking decisions that president, Mark Alexander, said he believed would have far-reaching effects for rugby in the country in time.

The Council accepted a raft of constitutional changes that were designed to better reflect the needs of the Springbok team by re-shaping elements of the constitution.

Key changes approved were:

• Permitting 74% shareholdings in commercial arms of rugby unions by private equity partners

• Increasing the make-up of the  independent and player representation on the Executive Council to five independents with six elected members

• Introducing new committees for franchise (Vodacom Super Rugby) and non-franchise rugby to focus and streamline decision making

• Moving responsibility for the appointment of the Springbok coach and CEO from the General Council to the Executive Council

• Removing the selection committee while retaining a selection convenor to work with national team coaches

• Aligning with the country’s geopolitical boundaries by moving to nine members of SA Rugby, while retaining 14 playing unions

• Reducing the presidential roles from three to two by removing the vice presidency from 2018

“We have made a number of major decisions today that over time we believe will contribute to making South African rugby stronger and therefore assist the Springboks,” said Alexander.

“The Council decided to open the door for greater private equity investment in rugby and greater business involvement to help recapitalise the game.

“We make no secret of the fact that in these tough economic times the rugby business is taking the same strain that every other South African business is facing. There is a battle to find and retain sponsors and supporters and we could not continue to do business in the same way. Rugby needed to make major decisions today to find new ways of doing things today and we have done that.”

Alexander said that the other changes would help streamline and speed up decision-making.

“The creation of the new franchise and non-franchise sub-committees gives us a more nimble way to make decisions by providing a more flexible channel of communication between unions and the Executive Council.

“The old committee structure has been overhauled and the new committees will make us much more responsive to the needs of rugby.

“The other changes bring us more in line with modern business practice by increasing independent representation and removing some of the anachronisms of the amateur era such as a selection committee and vice president.”

A decision on the scheduling of a proposed new format of South Africa’s Premier Domestic competition, the Currie Cup, for a seven-team Premier Division and a nine-team First Division (including Namibia) was deferred until January."

These so-called changes would have no real impact on SA Rugby deficiencies and remain talk is cheap - money by the whisky. 

 

This could actually mean change for the better. It just depends on how much say the government has.
The two key point appear to be:
1. Permitting 74% shareholdings in commercial arms of rugby unions by private equity partners.This should be interesting as it means the commercial sector will own SARU. (Not sure who owned it in the past- other than Louis Luyt???). 
This could make for some interesting conflict with the ANC government and the private-sector- on things like point two. 
2. Moving responsibility for the appointment of the Springbok coach and CEO from the General Council to the Executive CouncilWho will be on the executive committee? Maybe the main commercial shareholders who can exert influence on the selection of the coach. 
It is possible the government is taking a back stance on the enforced quota coaching and personnel . 
The others are just new appointments of token committee positions to talk about the past meetings.

 I am just worried that we might have a case here of: "I f you cannot dazzle them with brilliance, you baffle them with bullsh!t".

 Ceradunce
I must agree with you here - those guys at SARU must ha ve learnt from you in that regard. 

"If you cannot dazzle them with brilliance, you baffle them with bullsh!t". Hahaha!

Quite true Plum...looks like a disguise to me...depends on who the private equity shareholders are...one would need full clarity and disclosures before one can make an objective assessment of the proposals, sounds like window dressing to me with certain hidden agendas...a desperate measure whilst clutching at straws...we are tired of words, speeches and undisclosed proposals from individuals that are all talk and no action.

@See I've found that lack of transparency is generally always reason for concern. Always knew something was up when my parents got all hush hush as talks turned to the existence of Santa :)

 

"I've found that lack of transparency is generally always reason for concern"

That's wisdom...and it's insight from a young man...it's just a pity that some us old farts don't see it still...SA's by the way are suckers for punishment...words and words, meetings and meetings about meetings, indabas...lol, etc...thank God I've lost faith in what the media says...and believe action must follow...the word of integrity is not understood here and we don't know the value of it.