Schplotttt City

So many schplotts in the last 24 hours itmight be useful to just gather them together.... .... ...schplott for accusing denny of not replying when he is winging to Spain for a fine holiday .... schplottt on claiming Mike's photo was released against his will. .... schplottt on saying Gatlin took drugs because he was old, when he took them when he was young ... schplottt on insisting Whiteley would be back for the start of the RC ..... schplottt on dinging Etzebeth while whining for Stephanie .....and now Etzebeth, the 'show pony', is the likely RC Bok captain. .... So many schplotts, so little time. But here's the thing everyone of these schplotts originated in an unprovoked, out of left field attack. Embarrasssing.

 Schplottt on Whiteley being out for three months - please add.    

Well Tokkie I ignored you totally in all the schplotting, but here you are screaming to be let in...okay remember this comment of yours: ... 'RE: Etzebeth's incredible series tackling stats June 27, 2017, 09:16:42 There is a problem here which CC would never accept. With Mostert in the mix there was line-out problems on Saturday and that was settled when De Jager and Du Toit came from the bench on Saturday they both took French thrown balls, which Etzebeth and Mostert was unable to do.' .... ......only problem is only Etzebeth and Mostert took oppo balls, Stephanie and Lomp took none. .. Schplotttttttttttttttttt! Feel better now?

Here are the stats just to save you the bother of lying: .. E EtzebethL 0 4 5 15 0 1 1 1 .. F MostertL 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 1 .. The riight hand column is the LWS or lineout stolen column. And the French won 15 of their 17 lineouts....the two they lost are right there. How do you come up with these lies?

Well I watched the game three times and never saw a line-out turnover by either Etzebeth or Mostert.   Matter of fact there was a number of line-out losses when those two were on the field of play 9 - partly due to the inaccurate throw-ins.   I saw four penalties against the two mentioned players as well .
The line-out won by SERFONTEIN  was really the most effective one.   Second was the driving maul resulting from and coordinated by DE JAGER,, 
With Etzebeth and Mostert the driving mauls were non-existent or totally ineffective as well.
By the way Etzebeth had a good game, but the MOM by some distance was Serfontein.     

So you are right and the ESPN stats are wrong. ........fat chance Tokkie. We are back in the same place, you just lied. Now caught....schplotttttttt!

Mozart I saw two turnovers clearly and none of the others mentioned by ESPN.   If I am wrong I apologize.   However, even in general Etzebeth had a good game -  Mostert was dead average,     No real rolling mauls and critical line-outs were lost on own throw.
Du Toit's turnover could have been missed because Hougaard fouled it up, but ten what did he not foul up?      

Mostert was dead average? ESPN missed Stephanie's steal because Hougaard fouled it up.....you are cracking me up Tokkie. Why dontcha you pull up your pants....you have been caught again with them around your fat ankles.

 I am civil in what I wrote - but you crack me up because you know nothing about the game and make unsubstantiated statements all the time. Do you ever watch games = or do you use stats only as a norm for performance?   

 
"Why dontcha you pull up your pants" ...

English please. Please reserve your Moron for those closer to you.

Thanks.

Pffffffffffft.......hahahaha....so it's English you want Turncut. Noted, I'll try to help, but remember, you asked!