Just over a decade ago a fundamental schism happened on this message board, splitting posters into two camps, the one that supported Pieter-Steph du Toit and the one that supported Eben Etzebeth.
To be fair, those in the PSdT camp didn't hate EE the way the EE camp hated PSdT, but on this board over many years, a single positive mention of anything PSdT did on the rugby field generally resulted in loud shrieking, endless statistics, a lot of AI input and an invariable chest-beat saying that Eben is so much tougher/faster/important or whatever . . . this despite PSdT outplaying EE in over 90% of the games that the two played together . . . and that's being conservative.
I know I'm generalising a bit here and there are plenty of posters who have rated both PSdT and EE but I do think it's fair to say that for a long time, this board has been split into those two camps.
Now it looks like the argument is finally settled.
On the one hand we have Pieter-Steph du Toit, twice World Player of the Year, Player of the RWC final, internationally recognised as one of the world's finest players and - more importantly - still a vital player for the Springboks and he will be a key factor in the Springboks bid to win an unprecedented hat trick of RWC victories.
On the other hand we have Eben Etzebeth, widely recognised as the bully boy of world rugby, famous for running great lengths to get involved in any handbags, a player whose form has steadily declined in the last two seasons to the extent that right now, on merit, he's fighting for a bench spot at best and who has now stained his reputation with a disgraceful eye-gouge which could end his career.
So is this debate finally settled? Can the egg-faced fools who have derided, scorned and ridiculed PSdT while gushing over Eben and calling him the greatest ever player at any opportunity finally admit they backed the wrong horse?
Yeah right! Like there's any chance of that happening . . .
LMAO!