So Mozart is covered in an egg mountain again

Lets go back two years or so and look what he carped about Quinton de Kock be a poor replacement for Graeme Smith in ODI's and how useless he is in test cricket.   How De Kock cannot bat against Aussie bowlers and how his centuries in ODI's were due to poor quality bowlers.
He as per normal went the whole hog against De Kock.   His assessments on De Kock was based on his standard misrepresentations.
So come along the latest ODI series against Australia and he made second most runs after Warner.     Then the present test series made De Kock made 84, 64 and 104 runs in three innings - a total of 252 runs in three innings.
Still insisting De Kock is not a test and ODI level cricket player and admit you were wrong about him?

 Yawn..... a repeat of a repeat of a repeat....growup for f###s sake!

 It seems Mozart the Arsehole is ignorant over a lot of fronts.
We've all seen his laughable attempts at talking rugby ... freshly laid eggs an all. 
He's no better it seems at cricket ... or for that matter anything else ... other than self praise. 
It's best he sticks to telling us all just how wonderful he is. 


  

 Umm Would you rather have the board read about you bragging away about your knifings?

Oh BTW, it's not that I'm disputing your claims or how good you were.

 I understand now why your so fearful of me. You going on and on about the knifing of coloured folk and all. 
It turns out you're a MudBlood yourself. A mongrel ... with a comb-over!!!
Haaaaaaaahahahahaaaa!!! 
Well ... be advised that I did a lot of terrible things as a young man ... knifing coloured folk and all ... but my blood lust has decreased a little as I've grown older.
Now I like to pound MudBloods with a baseball bat. To hear the crack of a skull giving way. To see it turn soft and mushy before my very eyes. I tell you, man ... there's no greater high.
So you had better be on the look out, MudBlood ... cause I'd love to introduce you to old "Painless".
I take it your still in Sydney, right?

 



 

CleanCut

Status: Rugby Legend
Posts: 4650 RE: So Mozart is covered in an egg mountain again
November 14, 2016, 07:56:08

He's no better it seems at cricket ...

You are too funny CC...... too funny

Radeba !

 

 Drop the tough guy act CC it's not impressing anyone and is diss custing.

 Well said JW wee cc does get carried away. dense denise should also zip it as he is a complete empty head and lout to boot. ou maaikie should try not to be too repetitive.

 Ha Ha my dear friend Ol' Maaik is inviting Mozart (from Sinatras town) to have breakfast in Outshoorn...not quite...just a stupid dream or creation of my my own silliness...lots of egg...but who takes this seriously...the sad thing I would make it happoen and invite friends around from all over the world if it would not deplete my retirement fund...

Dr Win, Seb (in case you do no know your rugby the only clean playing French man that treated All Blacks with respect) and Beeno (????)

By the way Beeno, excuse my French it might upset our professional mole catching friend by mentioning this

 The following ifo from Nws24 about De Kock batting at 7:-
5 - number of consecutive 50s scored by Quinton de Kock in his last five innings. Before Tuesday's 104 he scored 82, 50, 84 and 64.
Those five innings represents an average of 76,8.   He played in 12 tests thus far and his average is over 51 runs already,   Kallis turned out to be one of the worlds greats - after 12 tests  his average was 15.   Does that tell us something about De Kock's potential - I think it does.
Personally I think the batting order should change with De Kock moving up to number 3 in the order.   With De Villiers absent I think the order should be as follows:-
1  Elgar 2  Amla3  De Kock4  Du Plessis5  Themba6  Rossouw7  Duminy8, 9, 10,11 - the bowlers   Duminy and Elgar are the poor links in that set-up and when De Villiers is back the above should be re-organized.   

I don't think I have said anything negative about Quinton since he lost the WC. Turns out he is a nice little bat against the worst Aussie attack since the Bodyline series.

 So the attacking ability of bowlers has declined drastically and that is the only reason for  De Kock's batting performances. 
And the lie invented by you remains about the WC fib you spread on the site.   When will you stop inventing issues when you want to blame any sportsmen you do not like?  
Also nobody but you and your cronies blamed De Kock for that loss = another case of rank prejudice.         

 Personally I think the batting order should change with De Kock moving up to number 3 in the order.   With De Villiers absent I think the order should be as follows:-
1  Elgar 2  Amla3  De Kock Du Plessis4  Du Plessis Duminy5  Rossouw6  De Kock7  Themba8, 9, 10,11 - the bowlers 
A dumb idea....ever heard of this one..."If it ain't broke don't fix it."
Well think about, QDK at first drop, the wicketkeeper who's on his haunches for a day in full concentration, now has to do duty at first drop. Dontcha think it's in his and the teams best interest to have a recovery period!?

Oh yeah ....a lie? This was one of the 5 fielding errors that cost us the WC according to the Sydney Morning Herald. What possible reason could they have to lie....you on the other hand are lying through your smelly, rotten teeth. The Sydney Morning Herald: 'Wicketkeeping blues After dismissing the dangerous Luke Ronchi in the 41st over, South Africa needed the wicket of the established Elliott to take control. Two balls after Ronchi holed out, they had their chance. Elliott attempted a suicidal second run on the return throw from the boundary by Rilee Roussow, but wicketkeeper Quinten de Kock missed the ball and Elliott arrived safely at the crease.' 'They had their chance' ....blown by Quinton. Live with it.

Quinton should bat number 5.

 The ball bounce was bad and you did not want to see that - stupid clown that you are.  
Howeve r, the fact that you did not recognize is that De Kock was out of cricket for two months before the WC due to injury and the question remains -  can any player in any sport recovers form after an injury lay-off during a WC competition?   De Kock struggled - but so did Vermeulen as an example - and Vermeulen is still struggling a year later = his performance for his club indicates that he is still below par.     

The ball bounce was bad......oh dear.....how unfair. So it's no longer a lie. Look Mong you were pumping Quinton 3 years ago, he was clearly not ready and proved it at the WC. Since then with his overseas exposure he has matured and is now a valued member of the team. I would still like to see him against express bowling rather than the Aussie medium pacers and Starke who by your logic should be no good because he is just back from injury. But currently he is playing very well. Now you have written many times along these lines....I challenge you to find any -posting I made this year, since he is in form, that suggests he should be dropped. Go ahead, the floor is your's.

 Agreed QDK is a far more astute and mature player than he was 3yrs ago. Surely it's plain to see...surely it's a non topic...no???

 Mozart
You constantly draw up postings of the past to attack posters and now you cry foul because you are in the same boat.
Let me explain - your attacks on De Kock was foul and that is while he was in a rich vein of form in ODI's  before he was injured and not able to play for two months in any game.
When as a result of that he was average in batting in the WC - you went into lyrics about how poor he was as a player.    The bad bounce from the throw-in missed by De Kock was recorded and clear - yet you stupidly could not or did not want to see it.
You are indeed a seriously defective brain polluted idiot.   You said you never criticized De Kock this year and stated the following:-
" I would still like to see him against express bowling rather than the Aussie medium pacers and Starke who by your logic should be no good because he is just back from injury."
You carry on about Mitchell Starc - What about Hazelwoood?   Look doffies one can just keep laughing at what you write - funny and seriously stupid. 

     

He was a poor player. Ask your great pal Roourinal who wrote this about him in 2015 Rooinek Status: Rugby Legend Posts: 4254 RE: Quinton fails again...SA/Ire match March 12, 2015, 10:33:56 Enough is enough. Either give AB the gloves and drop QdK or else at least bat this failure at 8 or 9! Dale Steyn looks more likely to score runs than QdK. ****** There you are. He was also selected in the WC Crap X1 as your good friend Rooiurinal pointed out in this piece. Much more vocal than me, so do yourself a favour direct your complaints to your biggest supporter on this Board....there's a good chap. Here's Rooiurinal: ********* 'De Kock makes the CWC "Crap" XI . . . March 31, 2015, 15:10:43 A NZ website has picked it's XI of the worst players at this year's CWC and Quinton de Kock (quite rightly in my opinion) makes the team . . . admittedly only as a batsman but he could have been the wicketkeeper for the Crap XI as well. You can read the full article here. This is the XI they came up with . . . Dwayne Smith - Opener - West Indies (93 runs, average 15.5) Quinton de Kock - Opener - South Africa (145 runs, average 20.71) Gary Ballance - Batsman - England (36 runs, average 9) Krishna Chadran - Batsman - United Arab Emirates (38 runs, average 7.6) Eoin Morgan - Batsman/captain - England (90 runs, average 18) Shahid Afridi - All-rounder - Pakistan (116 runs, average 23.2; 2 wickets at 141) Luke Ronchi - Wicketkeeper - New Zealand (73 runs, average 12.16) Kevin O'Brien - Bowler - Ireland (6 wickets for 408 runs, run-rate: 8.18) Stuart Broad - Bowler - England (4 wickets at 63.50) Mitchell McClenaghan - Bowler - New Zealand (0/68) Kemar Roach - Bowler - West Indies (1/150) Coach - Peter Moores - England Just as an aside, what a bunch of complete and utter arseholes we have for sports politicians! Imagine demanding quotas on the eve of such a big game after the side had already been chosen? No question in my mind these demands completely screwed up morale in the team and if reports are to be believed, neither AB de Villiers or Vernon Philander wanted to even play after the government interference.'

 Mozart
The crap is all on your side since - you are just to dim to realize when a player has talent and when he does not.   That is why you are always wrong and never has the insight to see whether a talented player will develop further.  

Feeble response.... you have just put your biggest supporter to the sword. Well done Tokkie.

 It is only BSters like you who n eed supportrs on this site - I don't need supporters since in my case logic prevails.