So the Eraser Master Plan is revealed
Yes, Kolbe was the only back who showed any thing worth getting excited about. It would help if Le roux could perform but he seems pretty useless. So other than Kolbe, the Boks are back to relying on forwards, defense, box kicks and penalties. Good luck with that.
Goodness only knows what's up with Willie and Faf.
Are we really gonna rely on the smallest chap on the side to be our best player?
Nothing against Kolbe but one big hit from the wrong guy and and there goes our best back.
Poor opposition do drag ones performance down. Probably applicable to some degree today.
Still, it was scrappy and the back line just look weird. Like they're unsure, unaware of space and really can't execute.
Italy were right in the game until the idiotic choice to dump Thor on his pip.
Hopefully they don't don't read too much into the win.
...and not a new one either Moz.
Which grates.
Moan, groan and moan some more.
yeah watched bit of that game last night - suffice to say the midfield is no PDV and Fourie... and Italy... i thought would have put up more of a show...
The commentary made the point the italians were dominated by the physicality of the bok... and if there was ever comparative advantage the boks have in rugby it is this.
Pollard is all class - strange we dont hear too much on here re him - I think if Faf gets his delivery right the bok backline may yet build and peak at the right time..
Interesting Saffex that the only centre you's have is Kerevi...(got a case of serious non-gay man love for him too btw)... I think he and Kohlbe so far are the tournaments standout backs...
Is kohlbe's injury serious if so - shame as he truly is a little dynamo... reminds me a little of (england league convert?) Robinson? a decade back or so...
Frankly Boks need to play their strengths and use the brawn they have in spades... not many teams can absorb that kind of beating...
The Boks have shown in the last 2yrs that the ABs are suscetible to this physicality... only england and ireland to me can match them in this area...
anyway - not the most clinical display by the boks... saying that still won easily...
tournament rugby always about the build no need to peak in the pools...
Strzok
Thanks for the entertainment - the same story repeated every week with slightly different word usage. It is funny how some developed Idiot Speak to a fine art. LMAO
"It would help if Le roux could perform but he seems pretty useless."
Good spotting although he's been nothing but for a while.
For further damage add the two carthorses who make up the centre pairing, par for the course with my garden gnome.
Hall Of Fame
38018 posts
Oct 05, 2019, 02:04
Our centres are the best we have ATM, and works well with our game plan. Nothing spectacular, but not the doom and gloom they are made out to be either.
The simplest plan is usually the best plan. Solid defense and a deadly finisher for the slightest of opportunities...Kolbe is doing what Habana used to do.
Short memory Saffex. Didn't ALB rip your defence apart and set up Scott Barrett's try vs Boks?
Thought so.....
Agreed, it's not nearly as bad as most lead on. Danie Gerbers and Jean de Villiers' are not easy to come by. The next great centre might be joust around the corner, but we are OK in the meantime.
Fair enough.
Funny Saffex, do you recall mentioning about 100 times JJ beating Julian Savea ONCE (from memory) and using that as an excuse for JJ to be selected for the Boks ad infinitum???
You do have a short memory....
Rugby union appears to have adopted a back line defense similar in play to rugby league which does not allow the breaks made in earlier years by players such as GDV or Gerber.
The opposing defense back line seems to be flatter and quicker to the ball carrier compared to years gone by.
It thus follows that many a good #12 today is not allowed the same space to get up to speed with the ball as has been the case in the past.
Most times the #12 receives the ball and the defense at the same time.
Just asking.


