FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  SPORT 24 Ratings

SPORT 24 Ratings

Started by bobbok...1 REPLIES1,442 VIEWS· 01 Oct 2017, 10:24
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
01 Oct 2017, 10:24
#1
01 Oct 2017, 10:24#1
Bok ratings: Well, the wings were better!

It’s been a weak area for a while, but the Bok wide men excelling was some consolation for the disappointment of failing to beat Oz again, says Rob Houwing






CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Oct 2017, 11:47
#2
01 Oct 2017, 11:47#2
 The above is a totally impossible rating of players.   Obviously the likes and dislikes of the compiler was in evidence.
The centers wwere useless and so was Louw and Dreyer -  with Nyakane bad as well.   The "calm"  Louw broad to the team in fact represented a zero performance iro the phase of the play he was supposed to improve.   There was nothing to prove that he did and the only thing he did pf note was to give away an early penalty and then going AWOL most of the game.  
I think that he obviously did not look at Serfontein.   His first half performance represents a 1 rating - in the second half he upped it to 3 - but still messed up badly.   Kriel was similar to Serfontein - not a real center at all.
Then there was Dreyer and Nyakane buggering up the scrumming - what a farce.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news