FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Springboks lose first match of the year

Springboks lose first match of the year

Started by Monkey D Luffy15 REPLIES321 VIEWS· 07 Jan 2014, 15:41
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
07 Jan 2014, 15:41
#1
07 Jan 2014, 15:41#1

Springboks lose first match of the year


The Springboks have fallen to their countrymen in a friendly exhibition cricket match against the Proteas, and despite some fireworks from the big South African forwards.



The cricketers won by 14-runs against the Bobby Skinstad managed XI, while Springboks Test captain Jean de Villiers led the team.

The exploits of some of the Springboks will live long in the memory of the 15 000 fans who enjoyed the first day of the Cell C Festival of Cricket at Sahara Park Newlands on Friday.

Faf du Plessis’ unbeaten 77 off 42 balls led the Proteas to victory amidst a truly festive atmosphere, yet few will forget the sight of Springbok lock Franco van der Merwe hitting three booming sixes or the surprisingly nimble boundary fielding of front row forward Tiaan Liebenberg.

Former Bok loose forward Bob Skinstad also showed athleticism beyond his years in the field and top-scored for his side with 34 from 23 balls, while current Bok loosie Willem Alberts found himself on an unfamiliar type of hat-trick after dismissing Quinton de Kock and Henry Davids with consecutive deliveries.

After the crowd had been entertained by Prime Circle and seen Allan Donald bowl an over to Skinstad, the Springboks won the toss and elected to field first.

Jacques Kallis opened the innings in his first match on his home ground since the announcement that he would retire from Test cricket, and received a rousing ovation from both the Newlands crowd and the Boks after scoring a breezy 39.

While Du Plessis’ knock was at the heart of the Proteas’ score of 188 for four, he was helped along by David Miller, who struck 40 from just 22 deliveries at the end of the innings.

Alberts returned the best figures for the Boks, taking 2 for 14 from two overs, while Francois Steyn and Duane Vermeulen also picked up wickets.

The Bok innings saw the Proteas employ four slips, a gully and a leg slip as Liebenberg opened alongside captain Victor Matfield, who hit three fours in his 23.

Van der Merwe brought the chase to life when he hit Ryan McLaren back over his head for a maximum and then hit back-to-back sixes off Aaron Phangiso, but he eventually fell for 28 from 14 balls.

Skinstad kept things ticking along and hit two sixes of his own, but wickets continued to fall at the other end.

Vermeulen kept the Bok hopes alive along with r inger Rory Kleinveldt as they hit a flurry of boundaries, but when the former sliced to short third man the curtain came down on an entertaining evening as the Boks were bowled out for 174.

Springbok (cricket) team: Jean de Villiers (captain), Willem Alberts, Bismarck du Plessis, Butch James, Fabian Juries, Tiaan Liebenberg, Willie le Roux, Victor Matfield, Frans Steyn, Flip van der Merwe, Franco van der Merwe.
MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
07 Jan 2014, 15:44
#2
07 Jan 2014, 15:44#2
my my my, i cant say im surprised to see the Boks lose a match before the international rugby season has even started, after all its a culture thing,

proteas are lucky they werent facing the All Blacks who im sure would could use a beeno like vege only meal after the big feed of Bok and wallaby meat weve been dining on the last few years,
KA
KalaedFreddieClub Pro495 posts
07 Jan 2014, 15:55
#3
07 Jan 2014, 15:55#3
 Hahaha, could have worked better if they played a game of 7 or 10s against the proteas.  Let's face it, rugga players are not purposefully built to play cricket.  As for exhibition and getting both sport code fans to come watch does much for both cricket and rugby.  I suppose one of the main goals was to give Cel-C the advertising time they paid for by sponsoring the event.
All in all a good bit of fun for all
GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
07 Jan 2014, 16:02
#4
07 Jan 2014, 16:02#4

Old Mike please note...the great big Willem is no sloth...on the contrary the man is switched on also in cricket...he's agile, athletic...big men can be...I believe Alberts is going to have a great year.

 

Oh Heil King Willem ! and Beeno, Mozzie and Seb shout Amen!

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
07 Jan 2014, 16:23
#5
07 Jan 2014, 16:23#5

Seb


He is as agile as my granny  was at 80.   It was a fun game and he bowled slow balls at about 70 kms per hour.   Nothing much to talk about. 


As per normal. the report has it all wrong.   De Villiers had a stomach bug and did not play.   There were also special rules favouring the Springboks - so really it was all New Year fun forth Capetonians.  

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
07 Jan 2014, 17:03
#6
07 Jan 2014, 17:03#6
I was surprised not to see Lambie and Schalk Burger in the Bok side - both played provincial schools cricket if memory serves me correctly  
MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
07 Jan 2014, 17:52
#7
07 Jan 2014, 17:52#7
israel dagg apparently had a promising cricket career but chose the rugby path.

i guess the term promising is very loosely applied though, cos kiwis are about as effective at cricket, as saffas and rugby, 
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
07 Jan 2014, 20:24
#8
07 Jan 2014, 20:24#8
 Saf, Scalla was at a wedding. He was so eager to play, he almost asked the groo m to postpone the big day by a week.  :)
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
07 Jan 2014, 20:31
#9
07 Jan 2014, 20:31#9
15000 spectators.............. undoubtedly more than Durban had for the entire Test match last week ................ slapgat Guppies .
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
07 Jan 2014, 20:54
#10
07 Jan 2014, 20:54#10
"I was surprised not to see Lambie and Schalk Burger in the Bok side - both played provincial schools cricket if memory serves me correctly."
As DbDraad said, Skulk had to attend a wedding which he'd begged the groom to postpone. I believe Pat Lambie didn't play because his insurance wouldn't cover him.
I must say, having watched the game, I wonder if Franco van der Merwe didn't choose the wrong sport? I look forward to the return game of rugby but I'm almost certain it will be touch rugby at best. Either way, I'm pretty sure Bismarck will be looking for the name of Aaron Phangiso on the Protea team sheet!


RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
07 Jan 2014, 20:56
#11
07 Jan 2014, 20:56#11
Sasuke, I've also heard that Israel Dagg was quite a hot-shot cricketer. Tell me, w as he a bowler or batsman? I'm guessing all-rounder.
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
07 Jan 2014, 21:02
#12
07 Jan 2014, 21:02#12
 Sas, all things considered,  the boks did didn't do too bad. I'm quite sure your AB's would have been slaughtered.  Your team is doing well atm, like for the past 20 odd years, bar a few.. I know we lot are sore losers, but you lot must be the most un graceful winners I've ever seen. God forbid the shoes swaps feet. If you lot are so sour winning, imagine you lot loosing for a bit. You'll probably try to have the rules changed again.
MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
07 Jan 2014, 22:34
#13
07 Jan 2014, 22:34#13
@rooy,

not too sure TBH, only heard it mentioned by ian smith NZ commentator a number of times, and i found out last year that smithy use to be a crickter, so he must know what hes talking about, then again, NZ and cricket, maybe he dosent, LMAO, :oD
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
07 Jan 2014, 22:39
#14
07 Jan 2014, 22:39#14
 Looks like the Boks would beat the nz black caps. Bwahahahahahaha

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
07 Jan 2014, 22:54
#15
07 Jan 2014, 22:54#15
@dbdraad,

"I know we lot are sore losers, but you lot must be the most un graceful winners I've ever seen. God forbid the shoes swaps feet. If you lot are so sour winning, imagine you lot loosing for a bit. You'll probably try to have the rules changed again."
u must be new sarugby.com mr draad, cos according to some posters here,,,
- the All Blacks have lost three of the last 4 All Blacks/Bok tests
- every NZ victory was because of the ref who was under instructions from the IRB
- All Blacks have no chance of winning the RWC cos they won all their NH test matches
- NZRU paid the right people so that the All Blacks could win
- NZRU have the power to change the laws
- and so much more rubbish

this comment of urs,,,
"You'll probably try to have the rules changed again."
pretty much sums up the average saffa, not all, but the vast majority always have an excuse, and its never ever ever cos the better team won.

fortunately God wont allow the shoes to be swapped, cos i got brand new pair of DCs for christmas and ur not getting ur hands on them.
so while by ur own admission the All Blacks have been the better team ever since the SA and NZ started to face each other more regularly, u can take solace in the fact that ur use to always coming 2nd to the All Blacks so are better equipped cos this is the way of life for everybody, All Blacks No1, daylight, daylight, everybody else.

what i want to know is why do u want to prove the popular theory about saffas can only give it, and not take it right???
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
07 Jan 2014, 23:48
#16
07 Jan 2014, 23:48#16
 Dagg was a fast bowler & can apparently bowl at 140 k plus . Dunno about the batting  .
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news