FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Springboks ranked in between All Blacks and Georgia

Springboks ranked in between All Blacks and Georgia

Started by Chippo3 REPLIES682 VIEWS· 04 Dec 2017, 14:16
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CH
ChippoPro3,372 posts
04 Dec 2017, 14:16
#1
04 Dec 2017, 14:16#1

The Springboks will end 2017 where they started it - in sixth place in the World Rugby rankings - after falling one place on the back of their 24-22 loss to Wales in Cardiff.

South Africa's fifth loss of 2017 has seen them fall one place to sixth in the latest World Rugby rankings, with Scotland the beneficiaries.

According to World Rugby’s official website, Saturday's victory was worth 1.1 rating points for Wales, but that was not enough to lift them from their position of sixth.

However, what was a near four-point deficit to South Africa before kick-off has been slashed to a little over one point after tries by Scott Williams and debutant Hadleigh Parkes (2).

Top 20 in latest World Rugby standings:

1. New Zealand 93.99
2. England 90.87
3. Ireland 86.39
4. Australia 85.49
5. Scotland 84.11
6. South Africa 83.80
7. Wales 82.08
8. Argentina 78.22
9. France 78.09
10. Fiji 77.93
11. Japan 75.66
12. Georgia 73.46
13. Tonga 71.87
14. Italy 71.25
15. Romania 69.58
16. Samoa 69.03
17. USA 66.87
18. Uruguay 65.63
19. Russia 64.45
20. Spain 61.68



(re News24)

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Dec 2017, 14:27
#2
04 Dec 2017, 14:27#2
As predicted by the rankometer....even a small Bok loss to Wales was going to drop us to number 6. And Vlag pointed out a good Six Nations by Wales could leave us at number 7. We are our own worst enemies. That policy of selecting domestic players for example, copying the much better resourced ABs reallly bombed. Would we have beaten Wales if Vermeulen and Louw were playing? Quite possibly. In this case the window closed, but it makes the point. We can no longer afford race and location based restrictions.
KI
kingcornPro3,695 posts
04 Dec 2017, 17:43
#3
04 Dec 2017, 17:43#3
I think it is simply poor player management. I'm sure the likes of Louw, Vermeulen and Steyn could have featured more prominently had the coaching team decided to work with the players, rather than being childish and putting the onus on the player themselves. These guys have a limited club career and would be lucky to be earning the same in 2 years time. Why would you sacrifice your finances that would set you and your family up of the rest of your life just for a handful of springbok caps. I would have made sure that I asked these players to negotiate with the clubs that they will be available for all Springbok training camps and Matches and lets see what deal their agents can get for them.
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
04 Dec 2017, 21:09
#4
04 Dec 2017, 21:09#4
King, I agree, but Fransie has a record of not being too rager to play for the Boks. There were issues ever since he went abroad and even when he came back to the Sharks. I'm tired of the Bok coaching team begging him to play for SA. Any player can negotiate any deal the choose, but at some cost.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news