Starting 15 Analysis
Lappies is the best option for 7 and I'd prefer to see Arno Botha at 8, but I believe Meyer will use him as a 7, as will the Bulls because of Spies being their Captain and the amount of loosies that have left.
Moz, will your mind by changed if he has just as good of a season next year that he's had this year? Or do you just dislike him because he threatens Alberts position.
In terms of potential newbies like Labuschagne I try and project what they would do in a Bok jersey. Firstly by analogy...and the best example is probably Coetzee, who certainly wasn't adequate. Secondly by weighing strengths and weaknesses. In that context he is certainly fast and a good lineout jumper, but a poor fetcher and not physical in any sense. I can't think of one established international flank who is not a physical monster....it's a charnel house out there.
So no it's not personal, I think his strengths are not crucial for an international flank and his weaknesses are. And other fast players, somewhat similar to him...like Daniel and Coetzee....have failed
Mozart
The miss tackle by Lappies - the best tackler by a mile in Super 15 - was never a realistic tackle - you dumb old nut. He was not near enough to tackle Lambie and that was confirmed time and again on review - he never attempted a tackle - so how could it be a missed tackle.
This reminds me of missed tackles - did Morne not miss a tackle on Barrett when he was much nearer to him and even slapped him on his back to wish him well? But Morne is forgiven because of a real miss tackle and Labuschagne is blamed for a missed tackle that never occurred.
Fetcher Coetzee is not - Labuschagne definitely is - you are fully aware of the situation. In the whole of Super 15 the turnovers in possession was as follows:-
Labuschagne = 14
Messam = 6
Read = 8
Alberts = 0
How can a player make turnovers in possession when he is not a fetcher and make more than other top internationals? Why is fetching then a requirement in Labuscgane's case and not in Alberts case? Why is Alberts acceptable when he never makes a turnover or never even affect one ball recovery in breakdowns and never protect tackled players to ensure ball retention?
O yes - Alberts is a physical monster - but he is not a tackler of note - lets just think about Read and the two Samoans who scored tries just running around him. Your physical monster has serious flaws. He is to quote your words a "charnel house out there".
Part of Mozart's normal nutty approach and expected from him when he dislikes a player totally without reason - and use lies to justify his stand.
Yes - in your own words - you dislike Fourie - but you dislike Engelbrecht more - so now Fourie is your favourite again.
At fullback......the best options are Taute, Willie, Lambie and Frans........with SP Marais looking a real candidate. Visser of the Bulls looks a good prospect as well. Andries Coetzee of Lions is another, who moved to 12 at the end of the CC season. Baby Bok Jessie Kriel looks like the youngster for the future. We are well covered at fullback.
On the wing, JP and Habana stand alone. I prefer Willie as 15 as he does not have the sheer pace of a wing, but he useful on the wing.There are a handful of youngsters who need to step up and show they are test quality wings like v/d Heever, Rhule, Volmink, Mapoe, Kolbe, Sithole and Sergal Petersen. Paul Jordaan's best bet is to play wing, he is not physical enough for 13. Its sad to see Mjekevu off to France, he looked such a great prospect 2 years back or so. SA Schools wing v/d Merwe is touted for great things. Baby Boks Sinatla and Obi looked great, Sinatla is tied into 7's.
At outside centre, JJ stands tall. There are some good young prospects in Stokkies Hanekom, Pat Howard, Sadie, Lindeque, Small-Smith, Dries Swanepoel, JP du Plessis and Tyler Fisher. I cant help but feel de Allende looks better suited to 13, as do youngsters like Andre Esterhuizen and Rohan Janse v/Rensburg. Taute is always an option at 13 as well.
At inside centre, Jean still has some experience to offer and Jan Serfontein stands out as his successor. Frans Steyns best position is 12 in my books and he is only 26 so has plenty to offer. Frans Venter has come of age this year for the Bulls and I really like the look of Howard Mnisi of the Griquas. There are a number of handy youngsters in de Allende, Andre Esterhuizen, Rohan Janse v/Rensburg, Tim Whitehead and Heimar Williams.
At flyhalf, we have to move on from Morne, plain and simple. The best prospect is Goosen, followed by Lambie. Jantjies has plenty of creative clout and Catrakilis is on the fringe. There are some good youngsters out there like Pollard, Swiel, Zielinga and Boshoff
At scrumhalf, we need Hougaard to rediscover his mojo for at his best he has no peers. du Preez has the experience to impart. The youngsters, v/Zyl, Reinach, Schrauder and Groom need to lay claim to test status. Kockott is showing he should never have been overlooked years ago in SA.
That's the backs
To your credit you recognize Hougaard to be our scrummie in waiting. Meyer gave in too quickly to the fans and persisted with the natural born failure that is Pienaar - he who showed so much promise at 10.
Goosen showed as an 18 year old playing for the Baby Boks that he was a massive talent.
Goosen will have a long career as the Bok 10 incumbent and will go down as twice the pivot useless Morne ever will.......wont take much to surpass the 60% win record Morne has.
If you don't recognise the class in Goosen, I suggest you start dedicating your time to ping pong
Time will have you eating your ill informed dribble when it comes to Goosen.......who is easily our best prospect at 10 since readmission.
Oh so you think that all those name you rattled off are worthy of even coming into contention then do you?
I feel so safe at wing now that we have guys like Volmink, Sergeal Pietersen, Mapoe, Sithole, Rhule and vd Heever waiting in the wings.
My word, AB's will never beat as with Whitehead, Mnisi, Rohan Janse v/rensburg and co chomping at the bit to replace Jean.
...and the stupidity shows no sign of let up...Seeing as 90% of the names you mentioned will never be anything more than average CC or maybe, super rugby players, I would say you are wasting your time mentioning them..Jee whizz Dave but you are dense!
Your post starts: "Our options are!"
No Dave, those players are not options you slob!
Look thickshit, here is some advice, keep your trap shut.......your stupidity knows no boundaries and I am trying to save you some face here........just shut up CHICKEN.......plank is too kind a word
Ha ha Dave, dave dave...Do you expect us all to believe you sat there and wrote a lengthy passage on the test incumbents?? I think we all know who the incumbents are Dave..
No bravid, what you did was mention challengers to the incumbents as viable options. You even started the post that way...Dont back track on your stupidity brave..you have already exposed yourself many months ago..Just live with it now..
Ha ha a whole post on the incumbents..Ha ha you crack me up brave davey crockett!
Let me guess, you thought Fourie was great yesterday, hey CHICKEN......cheap, cheap, cheap.........you found Suffolk on the map yet CHICKEN?
I will admit that Fourie didnt have one of his best games but that can be expected after such a long lay off. He will be better next week. I can also conclude that SA would have had 7 less points if JJ was playing as he hasn't the vision or skill to put Du Preez away like that and Wales never looked like scoring a try..Had JJ been there, they might have looked much better on attack...
So yeah, Fourie was nothing special but he was solid..We not even getting solid out of JJ! Expect JP and Fourie to be better against Scotland...They must retain their places all tour.


