The following article appeared in the Sunday Times on the above issue:-
"A dispute over payments to the owners of Frans Steyn's image rights appears to have been the final straw that drove the player to quit the Springbok squad dramatically on Monday afternoon.
Steyn left the team's base in Durban just days before the first Test against Wales at Kings Park in an agitated state following the arrival of some senior SA Rugby Union (Saru) officials at the hotel.
The 27-year-old player and Saru have been at loggerheads over the handling of image rights payments and the appearance of officials central to the dispute incensed Steyn.
His defiant stand appears to have been made on principle, as there is no obvious financial gain.
Steyn will lose his current contract and match fees and could lose out on a lucrative World Cup contract. It could cost him more than R2-million in total.
His image rights have been owned by a third party since he joined French club Racing Metro in 2009 - a standard practice for high- profile sports stars.
When Steyn returned to South Africa in 2012 he was awarded a Springbok contract with a specific understanding that the use of his image rights would take place under licence from the third party. Payments were to be made separately and directly to the party by Saru, but that was not honoured.
Steyn's agent, Gerrie Swart, would not comment.
Saru commercial general manager Andy Marinos said he had not been involved with the matter for "over a year" and directed inquiries to Saru CEO Jurie Roux.
But Roux could not be reached for comment yesterday.
Steyn was also unavailable for comment, having retreated to his farm with his wife and baby.
The Sharks faced a similar situation when they offered Steyn a contract but they were upfront and instead included the licence fee in Steyn's contract, which the player then paid to the third party.
"I can't comment on Saru issues but I can confirm that we have a great relationship with Frans," Sharks CEO John Smit said.
Saru tried to defuse the situation in a bland statement, but the reality is that a talented, 53-Test cap player, who every nation on earth would pay handsomely to play for them if they could, has walked away from the Springboks due to a genuine grievance.
Steyn is feeling the strain and his decision to take a break is as brave as it is dangerous.
"At that level of rugby if your headspace is not right you can't just run out and play - it's a contact sport and he'll get hurt if he is not fully there," Sharks coach Jake White said."
This is a baffling situation - Steyn has a contract that included his image rights with the Sharks and they make the payments. He also have a contract and his image rights was to be paid by SARU to a third party. This looks very much like a case where Steyn wanted double payment from two affiliated bodies for the same rights. I think SARU would argue that two payments for the same thing from SARU and the Sharks would create a precedent which is unacceptable. In essence he has played in total 5 tests over a nearly two year period for SARU, as well as the game on Saturday - in other words he was not a Springbok regular in any event and in that period was paid millions and now insist on extra payments to the third party referred to in the article.
Essentially there was a way open for Steyn - he could have sued SARU for breach of contract. He did not do it and the way he handled the issue means that he now is in breach of contract and SARU has the right to cancel his contract with them. They would no doubt do that especially since Steyn is at best a bench player for them and his performances in tests and in Super 15 was always very average and in some cases poor. His statistical record is in fact reflective of poor performances at 12 probably related to his knee problem
He still has a very good income - the Sharks will keep him on contract and he has his Japanese contract as well, It is however unlikely that he would ever be playing for the Springboks again.
.
