Summary of forum

Saffex: Moffie, you are an old, lying, racist, and I have proof, just ask denny.

Mozart: Dave, you are fat and short and can't possibly be a lawyer, cos you are too fat and short. You also live in a burned out shoe box at the bottom of a storm drain.

Denny: I don't give a shit about either of you, just leave me out of it.

Jalapino: Saf is my hero, i love him and If It weren't for the biological impossibility, I'd father his children. Moffie is a liar with alzheimers, he knows nothing about abything, and should never say another word.

Bluebok: Lets talk rugby.

Saffex: Bluebok you ignorant idiot! You are a fool, I don't remember you. Run along and fuck off! Actually, anyone who has a slightly different opinion than mine is an idiot, not just bluebok, just fuck off all of you.

Beeno: Bwahahahaha...not sure why I am laughing, but I am pretty sure it has something to do with Dave being a putz. Moz, I think I am falling for you!

Capone: I am new here, but I think I am in team Saffex!

Clevermik: Taute is just not good enough at 12....why is everyone ignoring the rugby chat?

Yeah, I think that about sums things up.

Bluebok we need role models so thanks for joining me in this lonely role I have carried off for so long with such distinction!

Just to correct one error. Capone is not a snapster gimp he is a rooitwit gimp. he plays chess against rooitwats chess programme and is hoping to win - some day (Virus etc).

Noted about Capone. :) If I am someones role model I feel a wee bit sorry for them....but I'll do my best not to create an Oscar.

Quite right Bluebok, the goal has to be realisable before on raising the bar. We are talking simple basics right now. Lets not get too far above some of these oaks. One still needs that common touch etc Hehehehe

Nice summary bluebok .......but the devil is in the details

@bluebok,

i dont enter these threads of this nature unless by mistake or maybe misled by the title like i did just now.

but u summarise urself as "lets talk rugby, WTF"??? o_O

the very nature of this thread says otheriwse.

dont bother responding on my behalf, cos i wont be back here, :o/

 

bluebok, this is not the first time you've done an "analysis" of the forum posters, is it?

This thread contains one of your previous efforts from a few weeks ago and . . . without dwelling too much on your obsessive nature or the lifelessness of someone who continually feels the urge to categorize the posters on something as insignificant as a rugby message board . . . I do find your previous description of me quite interesting:

"Jalapeno, I have nothing to say. He never talks rugby, he just comes here to argue, I ignore just about everything he says."

I find that interesting because the only contributions I've seen from you since you claimed you ignore me have been a long series of pathetic little squeaks for my attention and very little in the way of rugby.

You also accused Becs of not talking about rugby yet when I gave you links to examples of Becs (and my own) rugby discussions, you sort of shuffled your feet, went a bit red in the face and mumbled something about not reading everything on this forum. Remember that? Yes? But here you are again, talking yourself up as someone who only talks rugby and having a little pop at other posters who don't . . . on a thread that is all about your stupid, biased and childish little take on other posters . . . sweet stuff all to do with rugby . . . again!

Tell me, bluebok old chap, is there anything I can say or do that will return you to the state where you used to "ignore just about everything I say"? I'd appreciate it because your hypocrisy is starting to stink.

Sasuke, I posted my reply before I saw yours but you're basically making the same point I made, albeit in a much less long-winded manner.

I wonder if this bluebok fellow can see the irony in his hilarious "let's talk rugby" description of himself? I wouldn't bet on it. He probably does see himself as some kind of shining example for the rest of us to follow. Wehe!

Well bluebok I think you should assume something has made RooiAAS very angry with you. Could it be the references to him on this string? Nope even the AAS couldn't be that petty. The references to becs.....nope you have apologized after hearing about her medical difficulties.

Nope it has to be something else, because he is clearly angry....most often that has to do with me. So I'm guessing,  when you took the wind out of his holier than thou attack on me for using the term, "mong", might have something to do with it.

That exposed a decade of his calling me "moffie"....which clearly says nothing about me, but a lot about him. And having been caught with his pants down, he is now in the uncomfortable position of continuing this practice, but looking like a neanderthal as he does so.

Just a guess, but I'd put money on it.

Moz can you make that a slack jawed neanderthal. Wehe!

Their mong outrage is one of the more absurd moments we have had.

Who is bluebok, is the question

Saff, your response actually made me laugh out...good comeback.

Jala, its called a joke, you know, something to put a smile on ones face. If you are slow enough to take this seriously, then nothing I say here will explain. 

Moz, it seems only you and Beans....maybe Saff, took this for what it was, a little silliness before the rugby got underway. What can I say, I used to moan about these types of threads, but you'll notice I have been dragged into the soap opera, and can't resist taking the bait from time to time.

I do genuinely prefer talking rugby...for what it is worth.

Summary = A handful of posters taking pot shots at each other,dictating the board and deciding on behalf of every other person when it's ok to talk about rugby on sarugby.com.

The handful of posters you talk about Goodman are the guys who got this dead site kick started a year ago. Frankly you are coming across as a very sanctimonious cry baby. Explain where and how anybody has dictated when posters can talk about rugby? 

Wringing your hands and constantly seeing problems, seems to be your style, but how does that make life more fun.....which can be the only legitimate objective of this site.

Modern life is filled with outraged folk telling the rest how wrong they are.....priests, greenies, bleeding hearts, socialists, capitalists feminists, militarists, pacifists. They are all right and we are always wrong.

There is nothing worse than a sanctimonious prick ....get over yourself.

 Yes it's all funny in a stupid kind of way but then maybe because I do not know why the guys do it nê.  Some kids when they in school the will tease and mock a girl - but actually they do it because secretly they love this girl. So this is probably why these outjies do it too nê.

 Sorry Mozart. Did I touch upon a nerve Sir. I choose not to call you names. I find it amusing how a man who obviously sees himself so much better than the rest , reverts to calling another a " prick " . I thought a stiff upper lip was the upper crusts style. I stand corrected.

I must credit you with very good imagery , the wringing of the hands made me laugh. And the idea you have of my style, well once again, it's very creative. Perhaps you will show me some more of it in your rugby postings. Seeing that you have made your grand announcement to all and sundry that the time is right for a " ceasefire". Tally ho old chap.

ps. If you don't like me. Speak to the hand as the kids say. 

 Okay apology accepted....just as long as you keep calling me sir. Lighten up though, will you?

LOL Kitch

 I enjoy these 'call back the past threads '.