FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  SuperXV players Flops of 2014 thus far

SuperXV players Flops of 2014 thus far

Started by sharkbok1 REPLIES108 VIEWS· 02 May 2014, 06:24
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,295 posts
02 May 2014, 06:24
#1
02 May 2014, 06:24#1

15. SP Marais. A slow customer that offers little on the counter.


14. JP Pieterson. He has touched the ball twice the whole season, and is such a lazy runner that he looks slow. Perhaps he should play for his Japanese team and the Sharks at the same time, would not really make much difference.


13. No obvious candidates. Jean allways seems to be poor at 13, and when going back to 12 is good.


12. Hiemaar Williams. When ever he is on the pitch suddenly ever backline pass is a skip pass to avoid him. Why is Andre Esterhuizen not playing?


10. Peter Grant- Hopeless. Can no longer pass, kick or run. He is another player to return from Japan that just appears to have forgotten how to play rugby.


11. Kobus Van Vyk- Butchered the most certain of tries by not diving low, only for the ball to be dislodged...embarrasing. He all round game has been nothing, and surely he cant be the best that is available for the Stormers.


9. Louis Schreuder- the most over rated waist of space. His replacement is not great, but much better


8. Kankoskiw is a shadow of the player he was, albeit not as bad as last year. 


7. No Obvious candidates.


6. Jono Ross. A joke in bad taste at 6. The Bulls are lost at the breakdown without Stegman, but never more so when Jono Ross was on the pitch.


5. The Lions current locks

4. The Lions current Locks

3. Dean Greyling- Poor scrummager, and no work rate.

2. Callie Visagie. This is the worst Bulls scrum ever, and everyone in the front rate must take blame. He has no work rate outside of his poor scrumming

1. Werner Kruger- Poor scrummager and not work rate.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 May 2014, 07:12
#2
02 May 2014, 07:12#2
 I do agree with most - but for me the issue is not the players with very little game time that should be looked at - but the more established players that should be considered.  If that is the norm there are some other players who should really be considered.   I would also say that one incident in one game should not be considered - for instance over the season I do not think Kobus van Wyk was all that bad.   If we use one incident or even one game to determine poor performance - then there are a number of players who buggered up badly and could make the list.
15  I agree about Marais - he had sufficient game time and turned out to be poor overall
14  JP Pietersen - no argument
13  JJ Engelbrecht - showed very little in attack - no penetration when carrying balls
12  Francois Steyn - no line breaks, poor decision making, deficient passing game, too many missed tackles, too many ball possession losses, too many penalties given away - speed deficient. Only real positive kicking at goal.
11  My pick here would be Bjorn Basson - poor defense and way too many mindless play cases.  
10  Fully agree about Grant.
9   Schreuder - prime candidate
8   Kankowski - lost his grip and slowed down since he started to play in Japan (not alone in that -  Pietersen, Jacque Fourie being other examples)
7  No obvious candidate
6  Jono Ross - a real penalty machine benefiting the opposition
5 & 4   I think overall Mostert did quite well for a rookie - I would say Carizza is a real candidate here
1 & 3   Agree
2   Deon Fourie - he is no hooker.  Atrocious line out feeds, no contribution in scrumming and tight 5 play - a very active player. but he fails as a hooker and gives away way too many penalties in general play.
Saffex, Mozart and Beeno will have a fit - but the above are real problem cases.                     
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news