It's been alarming to me how our teams struggle to pass any further than the second man out. I ask, do we have one back who is an assured long range passer? Is it for a lack of power or technique? Some players strain and end up floating the ball forward. Where are the long darts the likes of which Du Preez, Morné et al used to throw with pinpoint accuracy? There were a few forward passes that went uncalled in the Stormer's game,much like every other week, calls which I see made against the Boks. Look no further than the 2nd Puma test, the Boks had three tries washed away by errant long range passing. We are missing a lot of opportunities because of this one flaw.
The Art of the Long Dart
Fuck me - back to his BS and lies again. Not worth further discussion. Once he mentioned Morne passing game his whole story goes awry,
Did it ever occur to you that you only ever say the opposite of what I say? I have on two occasions toyed with you, getting you to cross over your own feet and contradict yourself. Why? An overzealous itch to be contrary. Dr Auge is here to guide you, my advice? Close your eyes, sitting in serene silence. Relent to that calm submissive state. You'll see a faint light appear. Don't be afraid of this unusual sensation. Move closer to the light and allow your mind to conceive its first coherent thought process. See? That wasn't so bad.
It is easy to take an opposite view to the fairy tales you write on site and give the real situation by being factual. LMAO.
So, you have nothing to offer yourself?
No I have nothing to add -my comments on the issue has been proven as correct anyway,
As to your wh ole saga - it is based on one pass made by Du Plessis and that is what makes it so laughable. That while Morne since 2012 on test and Super Rugby level made hundreds of flawed passes.
Happy Idiots day to you.
"my comments on the issue has been proven as correct anyway,"
When and where? I think you should lay off the moonshine.
“ Posted by: clevermike (34873 posts)
Mar 16, 2019, 10:43Fuck me - back to his BS and lies again. Not worth further discussion. Once he mentioned Morne passing game, his whole story goes awry, I saw red and lost it....again, allowing the red mist to roll in. “
Fixed.
He sees my thread and enters with the intent to get personal. He had never opened a post in one of my threads which was any different.
I don't mind that much, so long as some kind of discussion takes place. I have a good laugh at most of his antics. It does retard the quality of the forum in general though. I think he should have the presence of mind to find a balance.
Morné had a long and accurate pass off both hands. With a 9 like Du Preez, we could effectively beat defenders by flight of the ball. What we saw under Rassie last year were chains of short passes to clunky mini-units which were deep lying and slow developing. Under Meyer it was flatter, quicker developing and wider. Morné was a significant part of that. The long passing of the halfbacks have been poor. Even Jantjies has struggled on occasion and he is supposed to be our Quade Cooper/Carlos Spencer. None of the 9s - including Faf - have a good long pass. So essentially, they are most effective passing to forwards at short distance. This limits our options, and it i s observable in every game.
That's a complete, coming from you. He wasn't a frantic runner. Saffers love an excited headless chicken. He was a distributor, and a very good one.
Silly Billy
Dave is right - Morne was a backline saboteur at best, He could kick at goal accurately with an 80% success rate, His out of hand kicking was accurately described by NZ commentators as BULLSHIT and was mostly aimless and to the disadvantage of his team. ,
And he was too scared to attack the gain line and just slightly better as a tackler than Slade.
You will never l earn anything about rugby - will you?
Imagine getting excited over a tractor ploughing into defenders in first gear.
Didn't you say the outstanding attacking game of the 2013 Boks was a moral defeat because Morné played? I know Lügnerin said that, I could have have sworn I saw an old post in which you agreed.
Too biased. I can reference instances of Morné's great passing game. Something which wasn't valued by Saffers who gushed over the frantic running of the likes of Goosen. Yes, runners who die with the ball. Predictability. Other sides who seek a more modern approach load their teams with passers. That's why the current Bok model is the most archaic in top tier rugby.
Thus from the same guy who has shown constantly that what he had seen in games are always dreamed up BS.
Yes the liar as been exposed at writing BS about modern effective backline play by the Springboks under Meyer, First of all Meyer himself dealt with the issue clearly and Mornes style of play was equally analyzed on a rational basis. Nothing described by Silly Billy ever happened as to Morne's performance at flyhalf.
Let me remind the dud once more - before the October 2013 test against the All Blacks Meyer said publicly - reported in the media - that he instructed the players to play a ball-in-hand game. That made Morne loosing the plot totally. As is evidenced by Merssam's second try Morne did not know when to kick and when to pass balls, So instead of making a relieving kick that would have ended the first half Morne passed the ball in a lunatic situation. That was the one and only time Meyer veered from his game plan as to backline play and he never allowed it to happen afterwards,
Talking about bias all the stuff you write on site is in fact biased BS - end of story,
.
Silly Billy
It is becoming a real bore to counter your totally deluded and misrepresented BS on site day after day. I think nobody is really interested in your drivel and I should stop reacting to the con stant stream of BS you come up with on site.
I think someone should buy you a muzzle.


