FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  The biggest liar on this Board

The biggest liar on this Board

Started by Mozart33 REPLIES740 VIEWS· 05 Feb 2014, 20:25
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
05 Feb 2014, 20:25
#1
05 Feb 2014, 20:25#1

Enough is enough....today Clevermike posted this:

 

"I did what you asked me to do as to the defensive stats of De Jongh.   To my horror it was discovered that he missed 35,7% of all attempted tackles in Super 15 last year - that was even 8,7% higher than the figure I used in the past."

 

This after posting numbers for half the games, or even one game in the case of Morne. It sounds disastrous....unbelievable really. So I decided to check. Here are the real numbers for de Jongh in the 2013 S15:

 

7/1 Brumbies

8/2 Saders

6/4 Cheetahs

3/1 Sharks

5/1 Canes

7/3 Blues

5/2 Tahs

7/3 Rebs

6/1 Cheetahs

5/0 Kings

7/2 Bulls

 

This amounts to a record of 66/20. Not good at a 23% failure rate, but clearly not a 35.7% failure rate.

 

Why does this happen time and again with this poster? Is he just an imbecile? Or is he an habitual liar. Take your choice. I have had enough of him....he no longer merits any attention.

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
05 Feb 2014, 20:34
#2
05 Feb 2014, 20:34#2
Paf, there goes another one . . . 

. . . Ou Maaik sends Pinocchio PantsOnFire (aka Moffie) into orbit.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
05 Feb 2014, 20:47
#3
05 Feb 2014, 20:47#3

Oh dear Rip thinks its the recipient of the lie whose  pants are on fire.. ..shampies.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
05 Feb 2014, 20:54
#4
05 Feb 2014, 20:54#4

Mozart


Whatever the figures - and I admit I checked the printout again and made a mistake by not reflecting the correct figures for which i apologise. but irrespective of everything else - your hero De Jongh - 


*   has virtually zero striking power; and

*   has defensive stats that is atrociously poor.


So whatever you say - he is a drawback for the Stormers and should not even be considered for their Super 15 squad - and he is piss poor in defence - even at 23,3% missed tackle ratio


A straight choice between him and JJ and JJ walked it by miles.


MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
06 Feb 2014, 02:10
#5
06 Feb 2014, 02:10#5
@mozter,

IMO u and brother beeno trying to pass off meyers 2012 record as 70% instead of the 58% it really was, was one of the biggest shockers ive seen on this site.
not the biggest shocker though, cos brother beenos has produced a number of hits.

but the sione lauakis uncle comment is still the heavyweight champion of sarugby.com lies though easy peasy.

good to see ur converting numbers into percentages has improved over the years, should we give the credit to the kiwis who have been doing their best to educate our saffa patch kids???

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
06 Feb 2014, 02:41
#6
06 Feb 2014, 02:41#6
Actually no, following your logic it would 75 per cent. Twelve games played, seven won, two drawn and three lost. So it was a 58 per cent win ratio, but a 25 per cent loss ratio. The argument was about how to handle the draws. Nice try. 
FO
ForeverArizonaClub Pro580 posts
06 Feb 2014, 02:49
#7
06 Feb 2014, 02:49#7
 Dont know about Luaki's uncle and that whole bussiness but recently had the honor of having dinner with Gary Teichmann.Nice bloke.He thinks Mayer is doing a fine job and couldnt really comment on the sharks as he has very little involvement there.
BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
06 Feb 2014, 04:42
#8
06 Feb 2014, 04:42#8
 Sasuke
“Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.” 
Aldous Huxley
Make that call brother..See if its a lie or not...Come on bro..In life we have talkers and we have doers..Dont be a talker..You are proving your ignorance time and time again.
Saia Maile098206110
Go for it boet!
ST
Sun-TzuClub Pro713 posts
06 Feb 2014, 12:06
#9
06 Feb 2014, 12:06#9
 Mozart, you are quite correct in your assessment, but I implore you to be a little while patient still; there is still the matter of Goosen's 2012 offings, and a shplott party is to be had. I think you are going to relish it once I have the clips spliced and arranged.

As per de Jongh Michael. How then is your 13 to be a strike force if the entire arrangement of the backs is flawed? There are times when an individual player lets the entire system down, such as Goosen of 2012 and Jacobs of 2008-2009. There comes a time however when the system itself is flawed. Looking at the statistics over the past few years it's evident that the Stormers have been struggling overall, not because of one individual; they haven't been performing amongst the backs even so far back as the early 2000s - long before de Jongh was ever though of. There also goes to mention the defensive struggles the team has had as a unit last season, or in other words, the perfect opportunity for you to distort the truth. Same old, same old.
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
06 Feb 2014, 12:20
#10
06 Feb 2014, 12:20#10
". . . and a shplott party is to be had"

A what? Did you say a "shplott" party, Alutwa . . . I mean Sun-Tzwat?

That's interesting. I coined the word "shplott" on the old SuperSport message board to describe the sound of egg hitting Moffie's fat face and to my knowledge it hasn't been used on this board.

It's obvious that you're an ex SuperSport poster so it's very interesting that you would use that word while denying that you're Alutwat aka Aristotwat aka Apollo and too many other aliases to mention.

We all know it's you, chump. You can drop the pretense now. It's just getting embarrassing.
TT
The_TruthClub Pro471 posts
06 Feb 2014, 15:10
#11
06 Feb 2014, 15:10#11
"I coined the word "shplott" on the old SuperSport message board..."

Bwahahahaha!!! I personally have used that term even before the internet as we know it. And so have many others I know of.

You also used the exact same term on this message board before...

October 26, 2013, 19:58:49 You there, Baboon-ou? Everything okay on your side? How's the pounding going?
Waaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Shplott!

_________________________________________________________________

Poor argument... try again!

I agree however that it must be getting embarrassing... For you!
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
06 Feb 2014, 15:12
#12
06 Feb 2014, 15:12#12

"I coined the word 'shplott'". What a lie RooiAAAS ....it's been in use for ages:

 

"Come See Me in the Country This Summer. I'm Begging. - NYTimes ...

www.nytimes.com/.../come-see-me-in-the-country-this-summer-im-beggin... - Similar to Come See Me in the Country This Summer. I'm Begging. - NYTimes ...

May 22, 2013 ... Once you were upstairs it was advised to close the trap door because if you got up in the middle of the night, sleepy and dopey — shplott!"

 

 

  • "And That Happened: Tuesday's scores and highlights | HardballTalk

    hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/.../and-that-happened-tuesdays-score... - Similar to And That Happened: Tuesday's scores and highlights | HardballTalk

    Jun 19, 2013 ... The Feesh to which you refer makes a noise like shplott shplott shplott shplott gahhhhsspppp. The beaver goes WHAP!. cur68 - Jun 19, 2013 at ..."

  •  

     

     

    Shplott!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

    TT
    The_TruthClub Pro471 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 15:13
    #13
    06 Feb 2014, 15:13#13
     Although I have to ask.

    How does it feel going from thread to thread, making your name arse over and over again?

    Your hero worship of ou DomMike is just as funny! Good entertainment though!
    RO
    RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 15:39
    #14
    06 Feb 2014, 15:39#14
    Well Barnacl . . . sorry, I mean Truth_Fairy . . . if you make up a sound effect and go type it in on Google, you'll probably find it's there already, just like "shplott".

    Fact is, I coined that particular sound effect on these rugby boards and if any ex SuperSport board members (including yourself) still use it, then I am 100% certain it's because of my initial use of it.

    You got that chump? Yes, I said 100% certain!

    Don't worry, Barnac . . . sorry, I mean Truth_Fairy . . . you won't be the first dull-witted sheep who is so lacking in originality that he's had to copy me or my style . . . Klown and Moffie (aka PinocchioPantsOnFire) do it all the time.

    Ssssssscchplotttttttttttttt!

    LMAO!
    CL
    clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 15:44
    #15
    06 Feb 2014, 15:44#15

    Sun Tzu


    You carry on about Goosen as if he gas let down anyboiy.   Mozart made five hilarious claims about the Whitelock try - he changed his story every time he was found to have misinterpreted the situation.   You constantly blame Goosen for letting some team down - but I have asked you in the past - how many times have Morne let down the Bulls and the Springboks.   What about that question - which is based on facts and not delirium and biased thinking.


    Now for De Jongh,  he =


    *   was poor in Super 15 in 2012 and 2103l

    *   was wcked in the two tests he played in in 2012; and

    *   has proven lack of distributional skills, but


    according to you all is forgiven based on a spurious argument that some fictitious players have let the side down and the poor performance of De Jongh is the result.  The ball goes to De Jongh - he gets tackled and any move dies with him - that is the routine.   


        


    RO
    RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 15:50
    #16
    06 Feb 2014, 15:50#16
    Ou Maaik, I don't think there's much point trying to engage Sun-Tzwat in rugby discussions, he seems to know even less about rugby than Smallcock.
    TT
    The_TruthClub Pro471 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 16:07
    #17
    06 Feb 2014, 16:07#17
    Rooinek,

    Uhm, copy you? That was a term we regularly used at varsity in/since '85. I've never used it on a forum myself, except to point out your mistake today. So much for your theory, then.

    As for your reference to Barnacl/Barnac, it appears you have me confused with someone else? Probably someone else you have an obsession with, otherwise you would not have mentioned it.

    I take it however, you meant to say Barnacle, that someone else mentioned in a post some time ago?
    RO
    RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 16:09
    #18
    06 Feb 2014, 16:09#18
    Oh, so I've confused you with someone else, have I?

    Pffffffffffffffffffhahahahahahahahahahahaha!

    Okay Barna . . . I mean Truth_Fairy . . .  let's just pretend that, shall we?

    ROTFLMAO!
    MD
    Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 16:17
    #19
    06 Feb 2014, 16:17#19
    @mozter,

    "Actually no, following your logic it would 75 per cent. Twelve games played, seven won, two drawn and three lost. So it was a 58 per cent win ratio, but a 25 per cent loss ratio. The argument was about how to handle the draws. Nice try."
    sorry mozzie, but its time to start taking some omega 3 or up the dosage if u already do, cos u obviously dont remember how that thread went down.
    beenos logic was the tests were draws, so they dont really count, and u pretty much agreed with that logic, saying that u could technically pick ur number.

    i fought long and hard to help u boys that day, and its fantastic to see that my hard work wasnt wasted, :o)

    here is a link to that hilarious thread, http://www.sarugby.com/forum.cfm?threadid=3173
    ,,,,which i conveniently and cos of a completely unrelated manner screenshot in case someone accidentally reedits their post,



    MO
    MozartCaptain49,914 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 16:28
    #20
    06 Feb 2014, 16:28#20

    I still agree eliminating the draws give the best indication of performance. Effectively that's what you do in any league table where you get 2 for a win, 1 for a draw and zero for a loss.

    MD
    Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 16:46
    #21
    06 Feb 2014, 16:46#21
    @forever arizona,

    "Dont know about Luaki's uncle and that whole bussiness but recently had the honor of having dinner with Gary Teichmann."

    heres the cliff notes on the whole 'siones uncles' claims which for many many many threads afterwards embarrassed saffas everywhere.
    basically, someone claiming to be siones lauakis uncle met boklogic in person and said that lauaki was on steroids, so that meant the whole All Blacks were on steroids.

    the outstanding evidence which had him so convinced was a few facebook pages of a family gathering which showed an obese lauaki, and thats it.

    since that day, the artist formerly known as boklogic, has been labelled by the uchiha clan as 'sione lauakis imaginary BFF'.

    the reason he made upp all that BS in the thread in the first place, was cos the kiwis here were having a field day at the saffas expense teasing them about the rife steroid use in south african high schools, and also johan goosens convicted drug record.

    why did sione lauakis imaginary uncle BFF make something up thats so fake it would make the kardashians look away in disgust???
    well, he wasnt the sharpest tool in the shed to begin with.
    i do sometimes wonder how many brain cells he sacrificed conjuring that adventure time story up though, so much effort.

    but then again statistically speaking, someone, maybe even a couple of people have to believe him.
    MO
    MozartCaptain49,914 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 16:47
    #22
    06 Feb 2014, 16:47#22

    Splott - Tardis Data Core, the Doctor Who Wiki

    tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Splott

    Splott was a location in Cardiff. History Bernie Harris lived in Splott. (TV: Ghost Machine...

     

     

    Hahaha Welshnek you are a joke.

    MD
    Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 16:55
    #23
    06 Feb 2014, 16:55#23
    @mozter,

    "I still agree eliminating the draws give the best indication of performance.

    like i said to uo that thread, a winning percentage represents one thing only, the wins.

    and the winning percentage is the be all end all of as u put it, the best indication of performance.

    "Effectively that's what you do in any league table where you get 2 for a win, 1 for a draw and zero for a loss."

    and what does have to with the price of tea in china????
    about the same as it does with ur argument.

    save the number crunching BS for PDV and the cohorts of similarly educated mofos, cos it aint gonna work on me, LMAO, 
    MO
    MozartCaptain49,914 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 17:04
    #24
    06 Feb 2014, 17:04#24

    You have me confused for somebody who cares what you think Sushi. If you can't figure out a draw is better than a loss, so be it.

    MD
    Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 18:00
    #25
    06 Feb 2014, 18:00#25
    @mozter,

    "You have me confused for somebody who cares what you think Sushi."

    oh come on mozzie, dont be like that.

    i actually love sushi, but use it the same way a woman always backhand compliments another womans outfit,

    LMAO,

    "If you can't figure out a draw is better than a loss, so be it."
    mozzie mozzie mozzie, of course a draw is infinitely times better than a loss, and i dont believe i said otherwise.

    buuuuuuut, all im saying is, a winning percentage is the be all end all of what (as u put) gives the best indication of performance.

    u can factor in the draws if u wish to cleverly brighten what was a pathetic 58.3% season, cos each to their own.
    but if ur happy the Boks got the draw, then i will give a prayer or three that the Boks feel the same way, cos than the All Blacks will never lose to them again.

    bottomline, win beats draw,
    draw beats a loss,
    loss sucks balls,
    and no team ever plays to lose or draw.
    so the wins are the only real measure of success.

    except kids these days in all sport, where u are given a complimentary certificate for just being alive, F-ing PC muppets.

    SARU, get that F-ing idea out of ur head right now,
    MO
    MozartCaptain49,914 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 20:37
    #26
    06 Feb 2014, 20:37#26

    Okay so a team has two wins and five losses. Another team has one win ....three draws and three losses (very plausible in soccer). By your measure Team A is better. But if it were a league, Team B would be higher in the ratings. And that would be the right result because Team was competitive in 4 matches vs 2.

     

    In any case, each to their own. I'm not saying I'm right, but to me losing is as big a negative event as winning is a positive event.

    RO
    RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 21:00
    #27
    06 Feb 2014, 21:00#27
    "You have me confused for somebody who cares blah blah blah . . ."
    Anyone know what it means to confuse somebody "for" (sic) something or someone?
    I know what it means to confuse somebody with something or someone, but confusing somebody for something doesn't make any sense.
    Looks to me like PinocchioPantsOnFire is trying very hard to copy me again but he doesn't have the education or the intelligence to even plagiarize correctly.
    LMAO!
    PE
    poi-ePro1,044 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 21:06
    #28
    06 Feb 2014, 21:06#28
     Not in the premiere league Mozart, 3 points for a win, 1 for a draw, the teams would be on the same points separated by goal difference.
    MD
    Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 21:11
    #29
    06 Feb 2014, 21:11#29
    @mozter,

    "Okay so a team has two wins and five losses. Another team has one win ....three draws and three losses (very plausible in soccer). By your measure Team A is better. But if it were a league, Team B would be higher in the ratings. And that would be the right result because Team was competitive in 4 matches vs 2."
    come on mozzzzie. ive read ur posts and ur way smarter than this.

    WTF are u bringing in so many mental soccer factors into this??? team A and team B, team voldermort

    here is the simple fact of the core argument.
    win beats draw,
    draw beats a loss,
    loss sucks balls,
    no team ever plays to lose or draw.

    and last nut not least, meyers 2012 Boks and their 58% in their win column were shite for their standards.

    "I'm not saying I'm right, but to me losing is as big a negative event as winning is a positive event."
    depends on the point of view, All Blacks wins over the Boks maybe a neagtive event for u, but its a positive event for me, and a who gives a F event for wnyone who dosent like rugby,
    MO
    MozartCaptain49,914 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 21:55
    #30
    06 Feb 2014, 21:55#30
     Grow up you lush....it's every bit as acceptable as "pawned". As for education you have  a BA Arts from Wits or some local school. That's educated?
    MO
    MozartCaptain49,914 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 22:04
    #31
    06 Feb 2014, 22:04#31
     Poie it certainly is true in the RC...which operates a 4/2/0 scheme. 
    BO
    BoklogicPro1,978 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 22:45
    #32
    06 Feb 2014, 22:45#32
    Yeah and sasuke thinks it gives you some legendary status to be a family member of a half baked AB's player better known for his thuggery with the Chiefs. Wait until he finds out I have actually met a few AB's in a Durban night club when the Hurricanes were in town against the Sharks. He just doesn't believe it's possible that these men are normal human beings.Oh Saia, why oh why did you not just lie and say you were the uncle of a half decent and current AB like Liam Messam it even a Jerome Kaino.
    Sas, I know it's hard for you but try get your mind around the fact that Saia has no possible need to lie about Sione Lauaki. It does nothing for his life. You like to THINK you are smart and break down posts so why not investigate and call the man and set up a meeting. He can introduce you to this fat slob who seems to be your hero.
    By the way Sas, I think you are right. The rest if the rugby world has used steroids to get to the size they are except NZL. That did it on a chicken and pasta diet. SA was also knocked out of the 2011 WC fairly and NZL deserved to win the final. TUI-Yeah Right!!
    SA
    Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
    06 Feb 2014, 22:55
    #33
    06 Feb 2014, 22:55#33
     CHICKEN using the word chicken......love it!!!!!
    MO
    MozartCaptain49,914 posts
    07 Feb 2014, 01:10
    #34
    07 Feb 2014, 01:10#34
    Some of these European backs look like their eyes are popping out of their sockets. I don't know if it's steroid use, but it sure is consistent with steroids or some form of doping.
    — END OF THREAD —

    More from Rugby

    More news