FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  The Bok Bench clinches it

The Bok Bench clinches it

Started by sharkbok4 REPLIES168 VIEWS· 27 Sept 2014, 22:04
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,294 posts
27 Sept 2014, 22:04
#1
27 Sept 2014, 22:04#1

Pat Lambie had the game of his Springbok career.   

Lambie was taking on the advantage line pulling the opposition defence out of alignment, and allowing runners to angle off him into space. 


Pollard started well but his passes got loose, and he was throwing really long passes. Lambies last try showed that he is no longer Bambie. 

He has muscled up considerably but still has stepping ability- showing skills and power to get that try with killed Australia.


Reinach has got pace to burn, and is probably the fastest player in team.


Schalk Burger's work rate was sublime. He has to start at number 7 next week. Mohoje was solid, but his work rate is no where near Burger. 

Burger's no look passes are better than most of the backs passing skills. That one when he flicked it through his legs was sublme. 

I think the game turned as soon as Burger came onto the pitch. The break down was a comedy of errors for the Boks, with slow sloppy possession the order of the day. Only Duane Vermuelen was making an impact at the breakdown, and to some degree Adrian Strauss. 

The backrow was not doing well as a unit at the breakdown, but with the entry of Burger on to the pitch the dynamics worked much better.

The Bok breakdown against the All Blacks last week was maybe the best it has ever been, so the whole dynamics changed with the loss of Louw. 


Bismaark played his best game in ages when he came onto the pitch.

Bakkies was solid. 




BO
BokBFClub Pro421 posts
27 Sept 2014, 22:12
#2
27 Sept 2014, 22:12#2
 Well done HM and the Boks, I will have the first slice of humble pie for calling against Hogat. The bench was massive and Matfield had yet another good game. Tiny Dave and Mike try not to fight over the rest of the cake.
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,294 posts
27 Sept 2014, 22:24
#3
27 Sept 2014, 22:24#3
For the starting players, Matfield was maybe my pick. Great at lineouts and kick off's as usual. Lots of tackles, good ball protection at the rucks, some decent carries into contact, and a great linking player in running moves. He plays more like a loose forward bar kick offs and lineouts, but he is very effective. The Boks usually have lots of strong ball carriers, so it is fine that he plays more like a loosie.
PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
27 Sept 2014, 22:38
#4
27 Sept 2014, 22:38#4
We won it when the game opened up, and the bench really made an impact. But before that...jeez, our back play is disorganized. There's just no semblance of structure. Everyone is just passing to the next guy waiting for something to happen. Le Roux taking the ball at 10 so often is not working. We have a great attacking flyhalf in Pollard, let him run the show.

Oupa made his tackles, but you hardly saw him in general play. This was probably his last start in a Bok jersey. You can't afford passengers at this level, as the way we got creamed in the breakdowns will attest. Contrast his performance with that of Schalk, who just popped up everywhere once he came on and made a big contribution towards the momentum swing in our favour.

Vermeulen was huge again. He has to be the best 8 in the game right now.

Hougaard had a decent second half, but was a cause of many of the problems we had in the first half. Bounce pass, pass into no man's land that nearly led to an Aus try (to his credit he cleaned up that mess himself by getting back for the cover tackle), pass behind Pollard, slow loop pass that put the receivers under pressure. That's just four of the passing mistakes I can remember in the first half, there were more.

We were outmuscled at the breakdowns. Louw's precision was missed. Coetzee battled manfully but wasn't dominant. Etzebeth? What happened to our enforcer? Even old man Matfield was more prominent.

We'll need to be better than this to beat the All Blacks, but well done to the guys for a strong finish. Nice to see us attacking right to the death.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
27 Sept 2014, 22:42
#5
27 Sept 2014, 22:42#5
 Sharkbok
I do try amd make an objective assessment of the players - since it was the ebnch players - in the alst 10 minutes that changed the situation around.   To be quite frank Reinachj is twice the scrummie Hougaard can ever hope to be.  It was not only the breakout where he inititated an attack that led to a try by De Villiers - his service ws snappier thn that of Hougaard.   
I agree with yoiu about Lambie too.   Lambie was always a player with huge ball sence and ability - and was criticized endlessly by poeple who did not want to see what he brings to the game.  The try he scored could have ben scored by Pollard - but definitely not by Morne.   It was not only the try - it was also the way he fotted into the backline and his service wider out that made a really good impression.   
Botha did near to zero on the field of play and he was not of any value.   Burger was very active and showed up well.   Van der Merwe also showed in the short time when on the field of play that he can be a better starting prop than Jannie is at present.
What bothered me about the game ws the first 70 minutes - when we blundered along and was often enough under pressure.   The bench really made a difference - but we cannot depend on the ebnch to constantly make that difference. 
The two outstanding players prio to the bench players arrival were Vermeulen, Coetzee and Etzebeth.        
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news