MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Apr 2014, 20:16#3
Rubbish...he ran 12 metres in the JJ tackle and offloaded. A good low tackle prevents the try.....this love hug JJ gives his opponent is not a tackle. You are so invested in this idea of JJ being a centre you have lost all perspective.

sharkbok
Captain23,295 posts

sharkbokCaptain23,295 posts
22 Apr 2014, 20:20#4
The supposed advantage of tackling high is that if it is done well, it can prevent the offload by pinning the oppositions arms to his sides, or even try to rip the ball out of his hands while tackling.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Apr 2014, 20:25#5
For that to work you have to hit the player hard enough to stop forward momentum....otherwise you are jersey clinging with both hands....and unless you happen to have a third arm, have nothing to wrap around the player. You're right SB the smother tackle has a role....JJ can't tackle low and he can't smother tackle. I wonder if Bastereaud could do 30 metres cum JJ?
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Apr 2014, 20:46#7
End of what? End of the Bools hopes in the game. He allowed AC to make metres, and offload in the tackle for a try. Those are the facts. I have no problem admitting de Jongh missed one open field tackle on Saturday....why are you so unable to just admit JJ's feeble tackle attempt on AC led to a try. This guy doesn't have a competitive bone in his body.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Apr 2014, 21:06#9
So in your view a centre that makes contact outside the 22 and permits an offload 15 metres from the try line has fulfilled his defensive duties. What a joke. A low tackle which was called for would have stopped the moves momentum, a smother tackle was more risky but could have worked....a feeble jersey grab resulted in a try. JJ is a defensive liability....Bosch proved that, Barrett proved that, de Jongh proved that and now AC proves it all again.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
22 Apr 2014, 21:30#11
Twatbok, what you know about rugby is scary
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Apr 2014, 21:33#12
Inde ed, what Twatbok knows about rugby can be written on the back of the world's smallest postage stamp in block capitals using an extra thick felt highlighter.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Apr 2014, 21:36#13
Mozart
I looked at the clip of Sharkbok and you have again published bullshit - nobody dragged anybody for 12 meters as a start. JJ got to Ashley-Cooper and form the time he got to him till he brought him down was less than three paces.
It was a very difficult attack to defend against because the lock recipient (I believe Matfield) buggered up the kick in badly and from that moment onwards the Bulls was on the back foot.
However, you should not write fibs on this site - it is not really ethical.

sharkbok
Captain23,295 posts

sharkbokCaptain23,295 posts
22 Apr 2014, 21:52#14
Rooicock, Aka Saffex's bitch. It seems your are obsessed with Saffex following him around like a loyal puppy.
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Apr 2014, 22:03#15
Oh right, the implication being that if two different people both think that you're a sad, insignificant and stupid little man then they must be conspiring against you?
Waaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaha!
Anyway, pleased to see you're finally getting the hang of this posting thing, Twatbok . . . you only posted that onc e! Progress! Good job!
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Apr 2014, 22:29#16
Thanks SB that's useful. RooiAAS if you have nothing to say on the topic, slope off to your favourite bar you lush.
Now on the substance JJ is going backwards as per usual, before the tackle. After he makes contact with AC I count 8 strides. He could probably have continued on dragging JJ, but Hougaard jumped on his back and Folau was in perfect position for the offload. Weak defending by a serial weak defender.
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
22 Apr 2014, 23:45#17
Moz I have to agree that JJ is not a hard hitter and barely adequate. He is a wing and the experience he has gained at center will make him an even better wing.
How about this for a future Bok Back line and pack.Reinach, Sweil, JJ, Jan Serfontein, Jordaan, Willie, Mvovo.
Forwards:Coenie, Stauss, MalherbeEtzebeth, Du Toit.Deon F ourie, Willie Britz, Jaque Du Plessis (7)
Nice mobile pack of 930kg odd. Serious running backs covered by two very mobile loosies and a mobile pack. There is not a back there that cant cut a line.
Then we strive to play a balanced game re the Boks of old.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
23 Apr 2014, 00:26#19
Mozart
The one reason why our backlines do not produce any positive results is that they select big players without skills and ball sense and then expect from them to be successful. The big fellows include De Villiers - whom I also support - provided he does not get blood rushes to his brain) like he did on Saturday when they caused him to turn nonsensical like happened on Saturday just before he got injured.
For the rest you are talking crap about players - if it is a meat grinder as you say - teams are busy grinding your favourite Francois Steyn in large pieces - show you what senseless big players can produce.
There are not many teams that play slow hog players - most prefer faster thinking players.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
23 Apr 2014, 01:30#20
There endeth the lesson from the Natal Department of Sanitation.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
23 Apr 2014, 01:37#21
Mozart
100% correct sanitation badly needed. When dealing with the amount of BS and hogwash you write on this site - I think the Natal Sanitation Department will be inadequate 0 they would have to call in the National Department.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
23 Apr 2014, 01:37#22
Mozart
100% correct sanitation badly needed. When dealing with the amount of BS and hogwash you write on this site - I think the Natal Sanitation Department will be inadequate 0 they would have to call in the National Department.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
23 Apr 2014, 04:19#23
Just watched that try again and its beyond pathetic that JJ was blamed for the try......all this crap about AC running for metres when in fact JJ first covers Beale and then goes for AC and takes him down within 2m of receiving the ball from Beale......what utter hogwash that JJ was in a position to hit AC low and take him out. Given this take, its obvious you only ever played touch rugby. Bloody hell we have a decoy runner in Skelton, JJ covering Beale, Beale drawing JJ, JJ catching AC and taking him down......but fuck me its JJ's fault.........what utter garbage. This is even worse than the shit I read about JJ missing Barrett or Bosch.
Moz your take is a pack of shit and your anti JJ is becoming tiresome.
One certainty is that JJ defence this S15 has been fantastic and I'm damn sure he might even have the best defensive stats of all the SA centres so fat this S15, if he is not top of the list he must be damn close......proving yet again that I am right......JJ has no defensive issues, never has had.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
23 Apr 2014, 04:22#24
Beenkop why dont you do us a favour and shut your ignorant gob......stick to telling us how shit Matfield is, that is more believable.
Moz has a massive prejudice against JJ, Sharktwat knows stuff all about rugby and you know a little less
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
23 Apr 2014, 05:32#25
Dave what's tiresome is your reflex defence of this woosie. aC makes 8 strides after contact with JJ....I counted them....if AC made 2 metres he is gaining nine inches a stride .
23 Apr 2014, 05:34#26
Firstly, shark bok knows more about rugby than rooicunt and I know this as I am yet to see a post from the prick relating to rugby. Only ever attacking posters like a teenager!
To get a better picture of what JJ is all about, one needs to simply pause the clip above on 26 seconds. Have we seen this tackle posture before. Yes we have. Did it result in a try? Yes it did. Did Boklogic and Mozart say it will happen again and again with JJ? Yes they did. Will it happen again? You betcha! As long as this man is playing rugby, it's as sure as Serfontein will step inside when he receives the ball!
Hang in though! Saffex reckons JJ has had limited opportunities this year due to Bulls gameplan. Funny that. Serfontein is enjoying plenty possession. Could this not be a reflection of Serfonteins inside step that Moz so rightly exploits.No surely not! Let's just put it down to game plan. Surely serfontein and JJ can do no wrong! Surely Swiel is not to blame for a dysfunctional sharks back line. It's not his fault he was playing both games sharks looked flat. Surely it's just bad luck!
Open your eyes Saffex you utter puss!
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
23 Apr 2014, 08:19#27
JJ looks like the distaff member of a couple doing the tango when he tackles....he bobs and weaves and goes backwards. At least until the ball carrier offloads. I remember Dave howling about Adi Jacobs failing to prevent the offload in the Lions series....but at least Jacobs stopped forward progress reasonably soon. I can't think of any centre in top rugby who yields more ground after first contact...than JJ. It's hard to call it tackling, tackling implies a discreet motion....the JJ "tackle" is a continuous motion that seems to go on for a while. And often, I might say invariably, it goes on long enough for other players to help....in the Folau case the help came from Hougaard.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
23 Apr 2014, 13:41#28
Oh what utter rubbish Moz, JJ gets AC down as quickly as any defender would considering he was covering Beale who drew him and then he went for AC and got him down quickly.......one would swear that JJ only had to cover AC judging by your take on that passage of play......your take is a load of rubbish, clouded by your prejudice against JJ
23 Apr 2014, 15:17#29
There will always be an excuse as to why from Dave. He doesn't think JJ should take any responsibility. Its always special circumstances that lead up to it.
Say, this all sounds a little like Oscar Pistorius!!
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
23 Apr 2014, 15:36#30
CHICKEN I know you are fucking thick and cant grasp rugby, for if you did, you would not conclude that JJ was at fault at all......so do us all a favour and refrain from adding your pathetic take on anything rugby - just go jump off a bridge or something.......but make sure it hurts on the way down!
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
23 Apr 2014, 15:44#31
If you want to get rid of Smallcock, just mention the name "Ka Mate" and he'll be running to his Mummy as fast as his little legs will carry him.
DEDenny
Captain12,893 posts
23 Apr 2014, 16:46#32
Technically JJ's style of tackling is flawed, he is bound to fall off tackles by just thrusting out his hands. Someone should advise him that it's the complete approach of hands, arms and body to effect the tackle.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
23 Apr 2014, 17:22#34
Last I checked he brought AC down after 8 strides, with the help of Hougaard and the consequence of a try. You can't fool all the people all the time, when the evidence is there to see in a clip available a few posts above.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
23 Apr 2014, 17:31#35
Mozart
I read this latest piece of BS and contacted the National Department of Sanmitation in a desperate attempt to get the issue cleared up. After looking at the problem 0 they said they do not have sufficient vehicles available to remove the mountain of BS you wrote here.
I do not like Engelbrecht and his defense is suspect - but keep to the truth and it would help. To manufacture BS does not help your case.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
23 Apr 2014, 17:56#37
PS OOM I know you are struggling to count those strides. Try putting your fat greasy thumb on your mouse and clicking on and off as each stride occurs. Then use your thumb and seven of your fingers, and you will find you get to eight! Or you can just keep diving.....hahahahahahaha.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
23 Apr 2014, 18:02#38
Mozart
I looked the video clip a couple of times. The first time Engelbrecht touched Ashley- Cooper was on the 22 line and he brought him down within 4 paces afterwards - not surprising since Ashley Cooper was running at pace and aiming for the gap between Engeolbrecht and Hougaard.
The 8 strides is the BS part - and the second assumption that "Hougaard recognizing JJ couldn't get him down went to help" is also a wild assumption. Carefu analysis indicated that Ashley-Cooper was already going down when Gougaard came to "help"
The thing that I recognize is that the NZ and Aussie players have developed off-loads in tackle situations to a fine art - our dead head centers cannot do it to save their lives, It is consequently doubtful whether any SA center or any other player would have prevented the off-load and to blame Engelbrecht on the grounds you do is totally unrealistic and dubious.
.
23 Apr 2014, 18:33#40
I am one of those that has reservations about JJ's defence, but in this clip I can see no fault at all. He initially had the player by the jersey but would have completed the tackle without the scrummy's help. I agree here with Mike, Cooper was at pace and running a good line, very few players would have been able to stop him dead in his tracks from that position. JJ made an decent tackle, it was very good play and awareness from AC and Folau that created the try.
Take a look at the start of the clip where the bulls no.7 is dragged almost just as far while making a tackle on Hooper. Is potgieter suddenly a crap defender?