I can see that there may be a few of the older playes in the 2027 RWC squad - but of those probablly Marx and Du Toit may be the only ones, But that depends on performance and not only age.
What bothers me most and came out in comments after the match by observers is the fact that team spirit in the team is a major problem for the opposing teams. The fact is the team is playing totally to the whole team and not individuals. Once one player is hurt or makes mistakes - the bond is even stronger than before.
I think that we do not find that in some of the franchises like the Sharks and the Bulls,and those two franchises needs a change as well. Ackerman inherited players like Pollard and Serfontein that hinder pogress of team development and I think they should look at what they can get.to ensure growth - and I do not doubt they would find the way to go forward.
In the case of the Sharks there are a new Head Coach is an essential and I think a new approach is needed. What about appointing Vermeulen as Sharks coach to replace Plumtree?
Another issue is that we must get away from amateurism and get proper game plans in place. The fact is the strong point in the present team is the team know where the strong points as well as weaker points in opposing teams are, They must defend against the strong points and exploit the weak points, So players must also be coached and trained to do just that. It may sound like theory - but it is what Erasmus main contribution as a coach represents and. Vermeulen will help masively in that respect.
What we need is available already since 2014 and was totally ignored by most of our franchise coaches and some training on coach level is necessary. These aspect emans the coaching team as a whole study detailed info of how the match should be played by evaluating individual player performances of opponents over a period of dsy four or five matches in terms of the process equitable to AI in rugby. That system follows every player in opposing teams and the Springboks use Jones as a central figure in that situation. The same should apply to potential opponent teams. Match schedues for the year on both test and franchise levels are provided well in advance and that si where every franchise should have a :"Jones" in their employ.
Lets be more specifc as an example and refer to the Bulls and to a more major extent the Sharks, Under white game plans were and are not in existence. White had one game plan and that was use of stronge forward play and ignore the rest. I will give you two examples - the URC final this year and th Sharks thus far this season. The forwards overwhelm their opponents and the backlines collapsed and the team loses all the potential advantages gained by the forwards and in that way lost matches, Two URC matches stood out as typical examples and those are the Sharks playing against Ulster and h necks week the Lions played Ulster, The must stronger Sharks team lost and the much weaker Lions teams won. The anwer is relatvely simple - the Sharks approach handicaps the team and the Lions played the match as a 15 man team and not an 8 man team the Sharks used.
Both the Stormers and Lions have two advantages - the teams are made up with younger and more mobile playes than the Buls and Sharks have. The playes are often unknown but bonds together stronger as a team. If the few Springboks in for instance the Storemers squad is away to play on test level the team is not really weakened. I referred under a separate threat where I dealt with contracting that the Stormers contracted the cream of the crop - the Bulls and Sharks paid massive salaries to individuals and ignore the conveyer belt you referred to. That is a very real problem as well.
Take another example as to the flyhalf issue, The Bulls brought in Pollard as flyhalf - but he did not have a good match on test and club/franchise level this year and the Sharks flyhalf is a joke in bad taste while the Lions one is supershit.- out of the blue the Stormers produce another matchwinner in the form of Matthee. Nobody in SA knew about him before - now he is MOM in their latest match. Not a Sacha - but a hell of a lot better than any of the other 3 franchise 10's. So what next - the next Sacha type 10 Ahmed is contracted by the Stormers and nothing of note by the other three franchises.
So maybe the converor belt should also be studied more carefully - I am sure Ackerman is going to succeed in tat and wht White did was the totally wrong approach which is making Ackerman's siuation much more difficult - but I m sure Ackerman can reproduce what he did when the Lions was very good in 2014 and 2015 by using younger and.more unknown players than the other three franchises did. For the Sharks a more forward looking coach is an essential. My choice would be Vermeulen.
. . . . . . . .
,