The good news for Quintie...
The real good news for De Kock is that he will earn R5 800 000 playing IPL cricket for 8 weeks in India - playing for Bengalure where AB will also play.
The list of failures the past test i s long. It includes obviously De Kock - but do not forget about the batting failures of Du Plessis and AB as well as the poor fielding of at least three pkaters whoi missed regulation catches.
SA groundsmen need firing. This pitch was absurd. The previous test wicket was l ike an Indian pitch. The groundsmen are morons.
This from News24 and not from the dud who started this thread:-
"Quinton de Kock struggled with the bat more than most in South Africa's 2-1 Test series victory over India.
In six knocks, the Proteas wicketkeeper scored 71 runs at an average of 11.83 that included two first ball ducks.
To put that into perspective, all of Kagiso Rabada, Vernon Philander and Keshav Maharaj outscored De Kock in this series.
What makes that all the more concerning is the fact that, throughout the series, South Africa have opted to go bowling-heavy and that has seen De Kock employed as their No 6.
De Kock has never been one to think too much about what he does at the crease. He plays on instinct, backs himself to play his shots and he has often described his own approach to the game as "see ball, hit ball".
It has worked for the most part, but De Kock's Test average has now dipped below 40 as a result of his struggles against India.
With four massive Tests against Australia coming up in March, South Africa need De Kock to start firing again.
For skipper Faf du Plessis, there is no cause for alarm just yet.
"We all go through lean patches. I think the white ball is coming at a good time for Quinny, it will unshackle him," said Du Plessis, referring to the six-match ODI series against India that starts in Durban on Thursday.
"He’s obviously disappointed, as any player would be. He will go back and work hard on his game and make sure he can be better for the Australian series."
It was important, Du Plessis said, not to try and change De Kock's approach to batting.
"With Quinny, he’s a personality that doesn’t think too much about technical stuff. He’s a free spirit, x-factor player," Du Plessis said.
"So when things go wrong, as any player, you’ll feel like there’s pressure on you to perform.
"For Quinny it is just confidence. As soon as he gets one innings where he’s hitting the ball in the middle again, he’ll just jump straight back onto that boat of relaxing and just playing his game.
"I think it’s very important that you don’t try and change the way Quinton plays, because if you start talking from a technical point of view to Quinton – he’s never played the game like that.
"It’s just the case that sometimes in cricket you’re in form and you’re on top and the runs come.
"Quinny is just at the bottom of the wave at the moment but I know he’ll fight back to get on top again."I would rather trust what Du Plesssis said about the player than what our local dud comes up with
Total repetitive hogwash.
Mozart
De Kock had one series of failures painful to watch - Graeme Smith had two full seasons of failures which was worse to watch, Read the above quoted article what Faf said about De Kock and try and leave the moron camp you thrive in. I would rather believe Faf than your stupidity,
So dimwit - you do not know the difference between 2 and 12?
Mozart
Let me quote your waffling:-
"Yep a long series of failures, some of which were painful to watch...repetitive indeed. But nobody can fail forever....take heart. :
I responded by saying that Smith in 2011 to 2013 had two season of failures - more painful to watch.
The gab is massive - totally favouring De Kock. He made more ODI centuries in 58 matches than Smith made in his 10 year career. Remember you cannot compare De Kock and Smith on test level - De Kock is not the opening batsman in tests. He replaced Smith as opening batsman in ODI's - that makes the two in ODI's comparable - b ut you do not understand the similarity issue at all - so keep up the waffling.
The gab is massive - totally favouring De Kock. He made more ODI centuries in 58 matches than Smith made in his 10 year career. Remember you cannot compare De Kock and Smith on test level - De Kock is not the opening batsman in tests. He replaced Smith as opening batsman in ODI's - that makes the two in ODI's comparable - b ut you do not understand the similarity issue at all - so keep up the waffling.
And he made the third highest Score and is attacked for that -while failures like Amla, Muller and co are not mentioned, Utter BS and to blame him for an umpire mistake is ridiculous.
Are you not ashamed of yourself for spreading utter BS on site?
Miller involved here, By the way De Kock strike rate was 77.8 out of a hundred and that is always good enough for an opener. Have you watched the game or are you always a prejudiced stooge.
I will give you a bit of a lesson on cricket - since you are totally ignorant. It is clear that Amla is really going down in ODI's and that there is no way that a player can stay on when he has developed hand-eye co-ordination problems, He is constantly being clean bowled or being LBW,
He should not open anymore and Markram should be moved to opener or they should call up Erwee from the Dolphins as opening batsman. Maybe Amla could then move to three or 4 - where he is likely to face slower and softer balls,
Duminy nd Miller was also really poor. So open your eyes and stop being a prejudiced fool.
It was from 45 balls - stooge
OK - I accept the 49 story, but the fact is that it was still 70% ad that is twice as high as the averages attained by either Smith or Kallis in their performances when they played in ODI;s in their last two years on the circuit.
Secondly ignorance personified - the Ref made a mistake and De Kock was not out and it was for Du Plessis to ask for a replay, neither of the two did - which was a mistake.
Now suddenly the run rate is what counts irrespective of whether the batsmen failed, What a complete hash you are always making of things - not a liar just plain prejudiced and totally ignorant about any code of sport.
Not as awful as you are with you stupid arracks on some sportmen performing better than your over-the hill losers. I a few times a year makes mistakes based on memory so you grabbed the to accuse me of being a liar - you make mistakes based on constant stupidity and misrepresentation coming up with being a total liar beyond equal.


