The kind of side you would want facing the Baabaas

My cup runneth over......a Dave list. How nostalgic.

I must have been very bored!!  

As a purely technical matter are you saying you now prefer Snyman over the mighty Stephanie...did Rettalik using him as a doormat influence your choice.

Nope PSDT has been awesome and deserved SA player of the year. Snyman likes to run it more than most locks so hence his selection for Baabaas game  

Okay everything is still awesome.....I love a positive report.

 No only PSDT was mentioned

 Ok ... so they'll use the 13 channel to run in try after try ... and with Jantjies there they'll probably watch him crumble under a little pressure and exploit his panic attack to their advantage. 
Can't wait to see the bench come on. 
I can see another record breaking score line coming.
  

 This Mozart lie about Du Toit missing ONE tackle  and thus becoming the doormat of Retalilck  seems now to have stuck in the useless idiot's vocabulary.   One can only wonder what is wrong with the village idiot - we all know prejudice is the norm is this case.    

Two tackles....you forget Pakie posted the second tackle you missed. Two times Rettalik used Stephanie as a doormat.

 The story is as stale as you and  your side-kick Pakie is concerned.   Do you pay him to be your faithful service.   What you - useless fart - is saying that the only two tackles missed by Du Toit in that game were both on Retallick.   You never saw him making 14 tackles in that game.   What a farce.  

No Pakie is his own man, who believes in honest reporting. You should try it.

Two tackles....you forget Pakie posted the second tackle you missed. 
Think it was Quacky that time, Moz (another independent source for Mike to attack now). I did the Du Toit/De Jongh miss on Ardie Savea. 

 So one missed tackle was on Savea and one on Retallick -  I gave learned never to trust Pakie since the Aussie test last year where  he added muissed tackles and reduced tackles made in his desperate in support of Mozart's attack on D e Allende.  

Two totally different incidents Mong. The person you shouldnt trust is the man in the mirror. Get it through all that bone, Rettallik swotted Stephanie twice.

Retallick swotting anyone sounds like a stretch......as for Retallick vs PSDT, give me PSDT  

It was a stretch, Stephanie was stretched out on the deck twice after Jaws monstered him.

made in his desperate in support of Mozart's attack on De Allende.  

No, to expose the two lies you told about those missed tackles. But you know this, and still prefer to lie about it. Anyway, I'm on the road for a few days until after the weekend. Have fun guys.

This from an idiot who tried under another thread to prove that Morne Steyn is a better flyhalf than Dan Carter.    Nobody should take this one seriously - he is just to stupid for that.  
By the way it was not I who tried to change the stats on De Allende's stats in the Ausie test last year,   He changed it to 12 tackles made and 7 missed from the ESPN figures of 15 tackles made and 6 missed according to ESPN,   After being challenged he ran for cover.  
A typical Mozart ploy -  lie in the hope that nobody would notice and then defend the lie.   That is what is meant by birds of a feather.    The easiest way is to say other people lied - and then keep on making the same allegations.    I have never said De Allende did not miss the tac kles like now implied - I consistently used the ESPN stats in that case.   The liar has been caught out again.                               

Oh dear....what a liar you are Tokkie. Here's your post in a long string about centre tackling in the 2015 Aussie test. Note carefully your comment that the stats were updated. The liar once again catches himself....it's so easy. RE: The facts about the centres defensively July 26, 2015, 02:13:44 Dave You must not confuse Mozart with facts. Remember he wrote earlier - "the worst he has ever seen" and he accused the SA centers of being Jekyll and Hyde. The stats have been updated and the situation is no as follows:- AB's Tackles attempted = 14 Tackles missed = 5 Missed Tackle Ratio = 35,71 Springboks Tackles attempted = 20 Tackles missed = 6 Missed Tackle Ratio = 30 So what he says about the worst he has ever seen must be admired as a real work of art in BS. 0 Likes

 Mozart
You are the liar - so is Pakie.   I never wrote about 14 tackles - I stuck to the version of ESPN.   Tackles made 15 - missed 6.   If your counting is as defective as your reasoning - it confirms your lies. 
I never said the missed tackle issue was acceptable - I said it needs to improve.
However, as per normal you and Pakie distorted the situation totally and that is where you get caught out time and again.   This is not the first distortion you have made with facts and then get caught out.   Let me remind you of your recent statement of how De Jongh was organizing defense of the Springboks in the Aussie test - without even mentioning that he missed 30% of attempted tackles.   In fact  the De Allende missed 28% of tackle attempts in that test against Australia - where you went beserk about.  
You went for De Allende in Super Rugby as well and when  pointed out that Fat Fransie stats were worse you went mad as well.
As long as you stick to facts - you are always welcome to state them on site, but your tendency to distort facts and post prejudiced stories you can only be caught out.