We must be kinder to the poor dear.
The Lügnerin Behind The Triple Posts
LMAO! Pretty much exactly as I pictured him.
Rooinek
The idiot with the 20 User names wrote under one of them that Morne Steyn as a flyhalf was on par with Carter and that Mohoje outplayed McCaw as a loosie. That amongst many total idiocies he wrote. Can you not help finding those two classics. He now claimed that he never wrote anything like that - bit brought up his classic about Kirchner being better than Folau as a fuill back.
LMAO!
Omlett and Omellete, the two biggest fools on this board . . . especially when they join forces!
The thread title could very well have been "The Rooi Myst Behind The Mozart Envy".
No Omlett, the title of your video - "Angry German kid" - works well . . . although "Angry German multiple personality arselicking schizophrenic kid" would have been more accurate.
Of course no one ever said that Steyn was better than Carter, and I was the one who compared their stats to make a point about Morne's defense, not the man of many names. But don't let the truth get in the way of a good story, lads.
Was that done before or after 2012? Morne did not foul up many tackles before that after that things went bad like the Ellis Park test where Morbne was piss poor and from there to the Perth debacle where he made 8 tackles and missed 7.
He was also attacked for his multiple other deficiencies like a very poor out of hand kicking record and that is where the man with the many user names jumped to his defense with all kinds of comparisons with Carter and coming up with Morne being better than Carter.
Nowadays the dim AO nowadays attacks the out-of-hand kicking game of the Springboks when in most cases effective follow-up of the kicks is possible and many times is benefitting the team. Mozart claimed at one stage that what is required is 90% his kicking game, However, neither of the two knows the difference between bad kicks - aimless and inaccurate - and effective strategic kicking, Morne's kicking game was merely handing over possession to the opposition - two commentators over the air identified 100% correctly Morne's kicks as BS, Never once saw Carter making a poor kick - Morne routinely did and was totally predictable, Morne w the only flyhalf that I have ever seen being boo-ed at a test. Carter 9/10 - Morne 1/10.
In the wonderworld of rugby OA dreamed up how wonderful an initiator of flat backline attacks Steyn was, He dreamed how on the insistence of the Plastics - Meyer coached the players of flat attacks - the only problem is that those attacks in the real world was virtually totally absent fro m sight,
There are at least 10 reasons why Morne was not up to standard as a Springbok flyhalf He was however, 80% in kicks at goal were successful and based on that the two agreed that Morne was a better flyhalf than Carter,
Problem solved - users of Idiot Speak identified,
At least I know a missed tackle from a successful one. I certainly wouldn't call it a "class act". Maybe Willemse being out of position for a game changing try conceded, or throwing intercepts are also "class acts". Weren't you the chap who backed Murray over Jean in 2007? Watson over Schalk? JJ at 13? Cooper over Carter? Some very interesting calls. Schalk at flyhalf? There's a trail of failure. At least it isn't Damian at 7 ala Freifau, that was quite funny. Now you can pop a vein telling me how smart you are.
LMAO
Idiot Speak is most amusing when it comes to AO, The BS stream is endless and the idiot keeps spouting it.
"At least I know a missed tackle ….:" Is that why you did not see the missed tackle Mostert on Sanchez??????????????
LMAO
Did I? I think your comprehension skills are lacking.
Here is the real kicker: You did not see Steph rushing out the line leaving his channel exposed. Just as you didn't see Lood fly past Isa, landing on his face. No, you can keep your opinions thanks.
Dave
The fact is none of the Idiot Speakers mentioned that Mostert missed the tackle of Sanchez. Pakie in his wisdom - ????? - posted a photo of the incident with Mostert flat on the ground. This was a huge mistake. I all along said that Mostert missed the tackle on Mostert and they denied i hat is happened. The photo proved that I was right.
AO did not see the incident because he did not want to see it.
ouDawie, I've just revisited your RWC squad, reaching the conclusion that you were on the piss, or simply taking the piss. Wot piss-poor picks.
The fact is none of the Idiot Speakers mentioned that Mostert missed the
tackle of Sanchez. Pakie in his wisdom - ????? - posted a photo of
the incident with Mostert flat on the ground. This was a huge mistake.
You will find Mike, that I represent events exactly as they happened. Why is it a "huge mistake" to accurately represent the incident? I don't have the agenda you have, of hiding, obfuscating, misrepresenting. I am only interested in discussing the game as it happened. Everything I put on here is fully transparent, fully verifiable.
Also, I told you Mostert missed the tackle.
I do wish that sometime in the (hopefully) near future you can move beyond your spiteful little interjections on this forum so we can move the rugby debate to a more constructive level, but I know I hope in vain.
Here are two quotes from my Xs & Os thread concerning the Puma try:
"Mostert simply isn't quick enough to cover for Steph against such a speedy back. It was a mismatch."
"Mostert, the secondary defender, missed the Sanchez Steph let through our line. Simples. Steph doesn't defend so recklessly, Sanchez gives a short ball to Kremer and they begin to probe again as our defence finds its shape again."
Hilarious how the newly formed ghastly trio miss such simple details. Out in the open. The same people who bleat with all their heart how much smarter they are than everyone else haven't the presence of mind to see the lamp post right before their dulled eyes. At least we get a good laugh out of them.
Pakie
You told me that Mostert missed the tackle after I asked about it at least three times. Mozart never admitted it and AO tried to run away from mentioning it.
Yes - you made a mistake by putting that photo on site. It proved that the whole story the three of you spun was another misleading effort on site, Distortion is the stock in trade of the three of you. After that photo and my repeated request about the feeble tackle attempt of Mostert you eventually had to admit that Mostert was like Dave said :run straight through. - but Mozart and AO keep on with systematic BS spouting.
As to the issue of Du Toit being out of line by about 2 meters is part and parcel of the rush defense system applied by the Springboks. When Steyn did the same ending up 5 meters behind the Aussie ball carrier- you published the photo's and then denied that it happened at all. Really absurd and total BSting as per normal. It is so easy to identify BS when the three of you are around - because even your photos prove when you are talking BS.
By the way that tackle attempt of Steyn on Matera was the third time I saw Steyn on his bum in a poor tackle attempt, The other two attempts happened when he tried to tackle De Allende and was just run over in a SR match, .
Pakie
You told me that Mostert missed the tackle after I asked about it at least three times. Mozart never admitted it and AO tried to run away from mentioning it.
Yes - you made a mistake by putting that photo on site. It proved that the whole story the three of you spun was another misleading effort on site, Distortion is the stock in trade of the three of you. After that photo and my repeated request about the feeble tackle attempt of Mostert you eventually had to admit that Mostert was like Dave said :run straight through. - but Mozart and AO keep on with systematic BS spouting.
As to the issue of Du Toit being out of line by about 2 meters is part and parcel of the rush defense system applied by the Springboks. When Steyn did the same ending up 5 meters behind the Aussie ball carrier- you published the photo's and then denied that it happened at all. Really absurd and total BSting as per normal. It is so easy to identify BS when the three of you are around - because even your photos prove when you are talking BS.
By the way that tackle attempt of Steyn on Matera was the third time I saw Steyn on his bum in a poor tackle attempt, The other two attempts happened when he tried to tackle De Allende and was just run over in a SR match, .
You are making a fool of yourself Lügnerin. One lie after another, followed by a fail. The one-two punch of your ill-fated rendition of the Skop 'N Pop strategy employed by your hero (a skop in the arsch, a pop on the nose). Ende.
Idiot Speak as per normal. Cannot stand the truth - can you? LMAO


