The man who saved Eden Park

None other than Lomp, who took us out of the 2015 WC with his feeble tackle on Kaino. A crucial moment not recognized by the lazy rugby press. We had just brought on Wilco who walked through Not-so-Mighty Williams in the first scrum. That put the Boks right on NZ’s line for Marx to power over,

The score shifts to 17 to 10 with the momentum all in our favor with 18 minutes to play and the bomb squad in place. NZ’s pack is presumably rattled by the huge scrum.

The kick off is simple for Kwagga to take, except Lomp takes out the NZ chasers. Penalty NZ and moments later Kwagga is carded and they score.. a school boy error by Lomp….Erasmus is screaming in the box and Brown is looking at the floor…a total cock up.

New Zealand should erect a statue to Lomp few opponents have done more for the NZ cause. He never played another RC minute after that test, was he injured or has Dr Lucky cast him into outer darkness?

That may have been the moment that made the somewhat ordinary Nortje the 5 incumbent. The good doctor doesn’t seem to trust Snyman to start in key matches.

There will be those who want to avoid looking or acknowledging this cock up…,they aren’t true Bok supporters. A historic opportunity botched by incompetence

Would that be the Lood who was outstanding on his comeback up to when he got injured

True Bok supporter you call yourself - fuck off - you are true to form here - a negative twat

Once again discrediting a Bok player

I did not see the infringement with it being Lomp who clumsily got in the way, but I do recall the passage of play that allowed the All Blacks back into the game. A critical mistake that was momentum-destroying.

As it was, with Pollard, Delande and Kriel, there was not enough firepower in the backs to convert Bok pressure into points when the game turned in their favour in the 2nd half.

Lomp is another very injury-prone player, who struggles to get a run given the talent at lock.

He sometimes seems better off on the bench. He does have very good games, but can go missing in others..

Nortje is the best lineout jumper the Boks have. The lineouts have been a shambles for some time, but they settled during the Champions when he became the first choice.

Nortje is the new Mostert, who himself is a wannabe Mafield clone.

If Nortje played 7 (if he's mobile enough), the lineout would be really good- with Synman as mid-lineout jumper, and Ezteth at the front.

Well these things need to be called as they actually transpire, the Boks had a real shot at a comeback. Lomp took that away, it was a crucial mistake an experienced forward shouldn’t make on a kickoff. There are some blowhards on here who call themselves Bok fans, but are more concerned that the players they have championed are seen to succeed.

Once again discrediting a Bok player

Is Mostert not a Bok player?

Yes Mostert is a useless player - I’ll take discrediting one player unlike some who discredit the majority

Try fucking waking up to reality Pakie

What Lood did do on his comeback was show how much we missed him and how much better he is than powder puff Mostert who we had to endure in his absence given Rassie’s insane call not to start RG

Even big Vic was saying come on Rassie let’s see more of RG

Most people on this site agree about most of the players. AE, DDA, Manie, PSDT, Kolisi, Mostert...and perhaps Fassi on current form, are the only really contentious players.

Yet there another 30 odd players that most of us agree on, with some arguments about who should start and what combinations should be.

In retarded Dave's very stupid mind, we should all like and dislike the same players that he does or we're unpatriotic and "bad" fans.

We should all agree that all the current Boks are the best ever and totally amazing.

And then we should sit here in fake humility and appreciate being so great.

No discussion allowed!

In reality there is zero problem with such discussions...tis what fans do. It's what people interested in teams do.

The only problem here is that Dave is unable to partake in those conversations like an adult.

...and that's down to his extremely low IQ and immaturity.

Buttplug are you inferring you have a high IQ and know your rugby?

Bwhaaahaaaaa

"Buttplug are you inferring you have a high IQ and know your rugby?"

The lawyer know doesn't know the difference between implying and inferring.

Your plankness betrays you, Dawie

No dumbfuck it’s inferring - now answer the question suck up

What about Willie's bugger op that gave the AB'a 7 points adte 3 minutes in the game - Skunkshit?

Your normal seeing something others have not seen is still persisting in your postings - in other words BS reigns supreme.

"No dumbfuck it’s inferring"

LMFAO!!!

Fuck you are beyond stupid

Again I have to explain the point to you Saaiman. We had just established momentum after being down all game, partially because of Willie’s error. But there we were back in the game and Lomp makes a school boy error. Match over.

And if you don’t believe me, you do have major comprehension issues, look at DrLucky in the box screaming his head off just after the Lomp disaster.

"Fuck you are beyond stupid"

lol you actually don't know the difference between infer and imply.

When you infer, you pick up on the hint or draw a conclusion from what was implied or for which there were hints or clues.

Tell me Dawie...how can I pick on a hint from something I wrote?

LMFAO

Lawyer my arse!

Um it was about your IQ and rugby knowledge you profoundly stupid fool

It had fuck all to do with what you wrote

Moron

No stupid the clear indicaion wa that he half abck pair malfucnioned that day and that was he main problem. How mny mistakes did Williams and Pollard actually made and how does a backline function wen the half backs actually failed, That is the answer you never even looked at.

Unfortunately Pollard has lost pace and so has his decisionmaking. If there as a problem at Eden Park it rests in those cases what happened n back line play. But even in that case another factor was the horribble weather conmditions impacted on the rugby played,

I do believe that some changes will improve the team - but those should be based on actual performances and not hate of players not related to actual performances which is very relevent in your case.

Okay, Dawie

Lets give you the opportunity to explain your use of the word "infer"...

You are too fucking stupid to understand

Look no further than this gem -

‘Tell me Dawie...how can I pick on a hint from something I wrote?’

I mean seriously????

Haha you are too lame to cover your stupidity.

I make a post, you say I'm inferring my IQ/rugby knowledge...

You actually should have used the word imply. Because I would be implying my IQ/rugby knowledge in my post...not inferring it, you absolute idiot.

And now your are lamely trying to cover your thickness.

And the best is, I think you still assume that infer was the correct word to use.

Or just go ahead, be a man, and tell me what I was "inferring" from.

LMFAO

You plank!

Nope infer was perfect but I guess that’s beyond you - look up the word ‘infer’ you fucking idiot

This is all we need as evidence of profound fucking stupidity

‘Tell me Dawie...how can I pick on a hint from something I wrote?’

You are too fucking easy - you and your bumbchum are so tangled in knots

Poor old Shorty…..perhaps this will help:

‘ imply means to suggest or indicate something indirectly, while infer means to conclude or deduce something from evidence or reasoning. Think of it this way: a speaker or writer implies, and a listener or reader infers

The speaker or writer, Plum in this case, implies….the listener or reader Shorty infers.

Useful?

"Nope infer was perfect but I guess that’s beyond you - look up the word ‘infer’ you fucking idiot"

It's actually quite easy...simply tell me what I was inferring from.

Or be both dumb and a coward and don't.

Lawyer my arse

Oh look your pathetic little bumchum has come to prop you up

Both equally fucking stupid

Imagine being stupid enough to have an issue with my use of the word infer

Fuck me - Buttplug my question was are you inferring you have a high IQ or superior rugby knowledge

Infer = to figure something out based on evidence or reasoning

By telling me I have a low IQ, I’m reasoning you think you have a high one - hence my loaded question you fucking idiot

Poor fucking idiots exposed once again

Give it up man

Woooooooosh!

Hahahahahahaha!!!

I'm not sure this guy passed std 8.

Oh boy just as I thought both equally fucking stupid

Owned

Yeah yeah, Dawie.

Anybody reading that can see exactly how much you just embarrassed yourself and how you've been a massive coward trying to weasel out of your blunder.

There isn't a lawyer alive that doesn't know what infer means.

You're not a lawyer.

Admit it, porker!

Ok Buttplug let’s see how high that IQ of yours is

Point out your issue with my use of the word inferring and my explanation

Take your time you very very stupid man

Yeah I’m sure most lawyers might struggle with this

‘There isn't a lawyer alive that doesn't know why infer means.’

I'd already very clearly explained it to you.

Your cowardly attempt at covering your blunder is a proper, and I mean proper, weasel move.

I'm embarrassed for you

No you worthless cunt answer the question. Your explanation if you want to call it that was a load of utter shit

You a little red faced now and and trying to divert...hmmm, clown?

.i..

I’m waiting coward

What are you eating for you wee red faced porker?

Stupid from both sides...

Boo hoo...

No stupid from Short and Portly ….infer means to conclude or deduce something …..the word he wanted was imply which he thought had the same meaning as infer.

Another classic case of Portly knowing everybody sees the lie but he refuses to admit it.

Just call it for once Draad, don’t sit on the fence.