The poor Rebels

They made a mistake and scored a try - then the penalty count started.   First one - the Crusaders frontranker did not bind at all and supported himself by pressing on the ground.   Forty meters out - penalty to the Crusaders to get on the scoresheet.   Next penalty on the 25 meter line - really is one since a Rebel player played it on the ground.

Then - when the Crusaders are back in the Rebel half - penalty again for trying to take the ball - held on like a magnet by a Crusader player.   A minute before the penalty was given - I shouted penalty coming up and voila - within kicking distance the penalty is given despite the fact that the Crusader player on the ground was hanging onto the ball.

Guess who is the referee?   Two more penalty advantages and the Crusaders scored to take the lead in the game.

The Rebels are buggered - the Crusaders have a free hand and can do wahat they want (legally or illegally) and they get another p[enalty within kicking range - score now 16-10 for the Crusaders.   Should in reality be 10-9 in favour of the Rebels.

Cheers - the referee is ruining the game. 

Yeehaa!! Rebels punish cocky crustaceans.... Peyper got all the scrums wrongs, Crockett went down and dropped his bind at every scrum and Peyper was blind to it. Richie McCheat was all over Jaco and he could'nt see the truth from the false...Crusties, your cheatin days are numbered...bwahahaha

Not too long ago, I was getting a few funny remarks on here when I said that the so-called greatness of the Crusaders is nothing but a media hype.

Bwahahahahaahhaha that is a rich one coming from a guy who defends the abcs at every turn. Where were you when Pollack shafted the Stormers by blowing them offside repeatedly etc etc.

The crusties let is slip here. To be fair they cant really be expected to be able to arrange to get a biased ref every time. As it was the score flattered them as Pyper pinged the Rebels scrum at least twice where it looked wrong.

FAct is crusties are a good team but not a great one. Ou Richie looks a spent force. before the injury he wasnt't looking too good. One does however need to see how he goesonce propely match fit as the rest goos have done him good.

Apart from the scrum where dubious things were on the go, the Rebels dominated the game. Their forwards controlled matters well and their backs had more flair.

Oh that the Stormers had had a decent ref because even with the injuries we would have taken them  - no problem!

Now all we need is for the Reds to beat the chiefies. Its time they fell off the totem pole.

 Geraldine, I agree he is a very good player - he knows how to play the referee.

"Geraldine"? ....who's this?

"Geraldine"? ....who's this?

Who pulled your chain asswhipe?

Lunatic

I've watched you post some snide comments about this forum and it's posters, I've read through your whinges re namecalling, by all accounts I've asked you a fair question and you've replied with abuse. I chose to ignore all of the above unti now.

I don't know you but I suspect you've been around the traps posting under a different alias to what we all know you to be hence the reason I believe you've  come on here with a hidden agenda.

There's one of two things you can do, bury the past and start again or continue down the path you've chosen, choose the latter and I will respond in kind....don't whinge like a sookie baby when I do.

I have a fair idea of who you are, based on that I expect you'll choose the latter.

Oh God, there he goes again with his conspiracy.   Seems you are clairvoyant – I have not whinged about nothing on this site.  I get the feeling you are ass-creeping someone  and as a result need to show your worth.

You do not know me, you have no inclination who or what I am – you are merely a keyboard warrior here to impress whoever is on your “side”  Please go forth and multiply...with your hand.  Like that other schoolmaster dead muzo – you are also dead now – fuckoff.

Arsewipe"", keyboard"" warrior are terms we have often heard elsewhere on a particualr website. I too have suspicions.

Lunatic, as Denny rightly says no need for foul language etc. You do not  explain who geraldine is - a legitimate question.