RG Snyman.
We've hardly seen him in the Bok Jersey and for years he's had unanimous support. I don't know anyone on this board that doesn't rate him as highly as a player could be rated.
I was thinking about that. And how I myself could rate him so highly on such scant evidence(well, it's not really scant, but it's certainly not enough either). It feels like hype but it also doesn't feel like hype.
Is it possible, in RG's case, to rate him as one of the best we've ever produced? Because when you look at the players here that have similar unanimous support from the board...the likes of Marx and Eben, for example...one could easily chuck their names into the best-ever hat and hardly anyone would bat an eye. But we have the evidence for them, we've seen how Eben can hold a game in his hand and how easy Marx makes the number 2 role look almost every time he plays the game.
With RG, we seem to give him the same level of respect, but with such little evidence. This is not to accuse anyone, because I'm probably his biggest fan on this site. And when I think of our best and most dominant forwards, his is one of the first names that comes to mind.
So what is it that causes this? Is it just that some players have an unmistakable aura of greatness? Is it that he's so huge, so athletic and when he does play he looks unbeatable in every exchange...I've even thought perhaps it comes down to some kind of sixth sense that we rugby fans develop after watching thousands of hours of the game we love.
I can't figure out why I rate him so highly, but I continue to and I can't see that changing.
I'm just trying to figure out why.
This was just a little rant...and un-edited, so if it doesn't make much sense then you have my apologies.
