CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
07 Sept 2014, 03:32#2
I was waiting to see what Mozart came up with here and was not surprised that he missed out badly as pernormal. Our line out domination was by Etzebeth. When the Aussies threw in the ball Matfield did not even compete once and his roole was in fact inadequate - anybody could have taken the five line outs he took. The rest of his play was poor and showed serously deficient physicality.
The best of the scrumming? When was that? Jannie got blown up regyularly in scrumming and our scrum was never better than that of the Aussies.
The guarded defense of the inadequate Jannoie and Matfield is clearly evident from the above. However, by Wednesday a reasonwill be found why Morne should remain as starting flyhalf - but atthe moment reference to poor kickingis only a vague excuse for his bugger-ups. What about the putrid defense of him and Pienaar?
The cricket performance is a really good blanket to cover discussion ofthe performances of rugby players - Well doe Mozart.
Talking of the ODI yesterday - the ultimate differnece in the team is that we do not have Smith and Kallisin the squad anymore. That gives us an edge from a batting perspective. Two geriatrics have been removed over the last year from our crciket squad - a good cleaning up of geritatrics from out rugby is urgently needed.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
07 Sept 2014, 04:42#3
Gosh, and there I was thinking you might want to apologize for your prediction that Oz would beat the Boks by 14 points .....and that Jannie would be forced off the field by Slipper. Seems to me Jannie pretty much sent Slipper sliding.
FOForeverArizona
Club Pro580 posts
FOForeverArizonaClub Pro580 posts
07 Sept 2014, 04:58#4
I have to say the aimless kicking by both halves were at times questionable,but then again we have rugby illiterate centres that wouldn't know what to do with a rugby ball if one hit them square in the face.So I don't blame them for kicking.Do we need JPP?I think we need a player that has JPP attributes.I would like to see what Mvovo can do at 13.He is fast,can defend and attack.Anyway,either way we wont win against Nzl.Not saying we will loose by miles but we wont win.Team morel is low,player confidence is shaken and so.e players just do t have the go forward anymore.I have to say we miss the bone collector.
PAPakie
Captain17,321 posts
07 Sept 2014, 07:55#5
Bok centres always get fed the inside switch crash ball back into traffic. That's all. We saw one orthodox backline move from the Boks all day yesterday - the one that ended in Hendricks' try. When is the last time we saw a layered attack like the last move by Aus from a Bok side? If that was a Bok move, Folau would have come back on the angle to crash into the forwards and set up a ruck again instead of running an inside shoulder line into a gap. We are terrified of taking the ball wide.
Bok centres are tackle machines, that's probably why Meyer doesn't even bother with combinations but just plays whoever feels right, even out of position, be it De Allende or Serf. No doubt Allende is a better carrier than Serf, but Serf is a better tackler. Easy call for the Bok way of play.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
07 Sept 2014, 08:06#6
Mozxart
Gosh - here I was thinking that you will apologize for your predition of an Aussie win by 7 points.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
13 Sept 2018, 12:55#7
So Tokkie.....I never even acknowledged Morne's mistake and tried to mislead members on what really happened.
You are a low class liar....the kind of person who has made South Africa the mess it is.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
13 Sept 2018, 12:59#8
For those who still don't believe Tokkie is a pathological liar, a man with a compulsion to lie.....this is what he posted today, trusting he wouldn't be exposed:
'What was really amazing and funny was the way Mozart nd AO tried to mislead the members about what happened. Mozart kept totally silent about the Steyn mishap and attacked Lambie for missing a subsequent tackle. When tackled on his silence he never admitted that Morne fouled up. AO was even funnier = he conjured up a mysterious wind blast that lasted while the ball was in the air and vanished immediately afterwards.'
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
13 Sept 2018, 13:32#11
'However, by Wednesday a reasonwill be found why Morne should remain as starting flyhalf - but atthe moment reference to poor kickingis only a vague excuse for his bugger-ups.'
You responded with that Tokkie....and I can't edit what you wrote......so clearly I did reference Morne's mistakes. Which makes your statement that I kept silent on the Morne mishap a proven lie.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
13 Sept 2018, 13:56#14
But I didn't edit my remarks as your response to my remarks clearly shows....caught lying again. The very fact that editing prior statements to win an argument is top of your mind is a tell.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
13 Sept 2018, 14:49#16
Would you just ignore it if somebody like CC lies about you WD?
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
13 Sept 2018, 20:50#18
Examples Tokkie, produce one case of me lying or altering a posting to win an argument.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
13 Sept 2018, 22:51#20
I got the year wrong....is that the best you can do. I can guarantee I don't lie.....not that I don't make mistakes. Now find the lies....go ahead if there are so many it should be easy.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
14 Sept 2018, 14:53#22
So that's your big evidence.....Nonu. You start out lying about lying. I NEVER said he missed the tackle on Nonu....why would I, anybody can see he never got to Nonu until Nonu passed the ball. Pakie proved that and nobody supported your case, because it was so obviously wrong.
Your best shot at proving me a liar is an example you lost in the Court of Public opinion. And even if I was wrong....which I wasn't it was an opinion and not a lie.
You don't have any proof because there is none.