The truth is the Springboks just want it more By Daniel Gallan

• 0
• 2

No other side with realistic ambitions at next year’s World Cup has struggled as much against their rivals as South Africa. Since lifting that famous golden trinket in Japan three years ago, Siya Kolisi’s charges have lost four of their seven games against New Zealand, England, Ireland and France. Factor in three defeats to Australia and another to Wales and the forecast is not an encouraging one less than a year from their title defence.

And yet, there is cause for optimism. Despite the near-misses over the last two weeks, the obvious deficiencies in key positions on the park, and their director of rugby’s inability to refrain from tweeting nonsense, the side has a secret weapon.

Last week in Marseille they put in their best performance since thumping England to become world champions for a third time. They were a man short for 46 of the 80 minutes and still came within touching distance of beating a team many have tipped to claim their crown on home soil next year.

Once Pieter-Steph du Toit was rightly red carded for a reckless – but, in my mind, wholly accidental – head charge on Jonathan Danty, the Springboks were not only playing with a man disadvantage, but had to contend with the vaunted French pack without one of their linchpins.

Until that point, Du Toit, World Rugby’s player of the year for 2019, was instrumental in marshalling a rush defence that was posing a unique challenge for the French who have for so long grown accustomed to generous time and space. More than once Romain Ntamack received the ball on his heels rather than his toes and were it not for a brilliant kicking display from Thomas Ramos, South Africa would have overwhelmed their hosts in the early exchanges.

Related

Jake White: The Springboks' unanswered questions

Italy are on an upward trajectory, but South Africa's World Cup winning coach can't see the Boks losing three in a row

Read Now

Cards are so often the difference at the sharp end of elite rugby and Du Toit’s sending off looked to have consigned the contest to a formality. Shortly after, Cyril Baille burrowed over from close range for the opening try and a rout was on the cards.

Instead, the Springboks rallied. Their seven-man pack started winning the arm wrestle. Willie le Roux stepped up from fullback and began running the show at first receiver. Faf de Klerk’s box kicks were pinpoint. Eben Etzebeth grew in stature as he underlined his credentials as the best second rower on the planet. Three different goal kickers slotted every attempt at goal.

Something happens to a South African when you tell them that there is no hope. There are many reasons why this may be the case and no doubt sociologists, psychologists and economists would all have sound theories to prove this argument.

Perhaps it is the fact that the country was founded by colonialism, was forged in bloodshed and continues to be gripped by violence. But that doesn’t quite work. South Africa is not alone in this regard and other national sports teams don’t have nearly as much steel as the Springboks.

We can’t put this down to any specific cultural traits. It is a myth that South Africa is one united nation. It is in fact multiple nations where nine official languages are spoken in a land that, were it not for British and Dutch settlers, would be divided according to these native tongues. You’ll find them mixing in small pockets known as towns and cities, but venture beyond the sight of high rise buildings and you’ll find a world that is less homogenised than the politicians would have you believe.

Related

Springboks loose forward Pieter Steph du Toit has been banned despite denying his head charge into France centre Jonathan Danty warranted a red card.

So, what is it then? What compels this team to reach deeper when resources are thin? What is it that allows them to keep the engines churning long after the reserve light has flicked on?

It might sound trite to those of you not from the country but it’s really quite simple. I’m certain that no other rugby team on the planet feels as obligated to win as the Springboks. No other side feels as tethered to the triumphs and laments of the people they represent. This might seem like marketing guff fabricated to promote documentaries and sell replica jerseys, but look any one of the players in the eye and ask them yourself. To a man they will tell you that they are performing their duty with zealous fervour.

Of course this means nothing if the other team is simply better at playing rugby. All the gees (spirit) in the universe won’t diminish the potency of Antoine Dupont or the composure of Johnny Sexton. But it might turn a seven-man pack into a force that belies logic.

‘Wanting it more’ is a cliche in sports the world over. That doesn’t mean we should dismiss it out of hand. Rugby is a game where wanting it more might actually be the difference between winning and losing. Tackling another human being, especially a very large human being, requires bravery and self-sacrifice. When you’ve managed to convince yourself that you’re performing that task for something that is more important than gainline advantage then you’re more likely to hurl yourself into contact with little disregard for self perseveration.

The Springboks are masters at forging a narrative that turns the world against them and them against the world. Like wounded soldiers defending a surrounded fort, they rally together and fight til the last. Again, this might seem like a sleight of hand and a trick of the mind. But listen to the language the players and coaching staff use when talking about what motivates them. They have convinced themselves that winning World Cups goes beyond their remit as athletes. They’re providing a service to a country that has little cause for joy elsewhere.

This is why recent results should be noted but not used as a cold fact that the Springboks won’t win next year’s World Cup. They’re on the wrong side of the draw and even a victory over Ireland in the group stage would see them face either France or New Zealand in the next round.

The bookies will have them as outsiders. They wouldn’t have it any other way.

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Also by Daniel Gallan

• Erasmus’ behaviour is an insult to his players
• Springboks player ratings vs France
• Rassie's narrative arc is turning us off

Trending on RugbyPass

Jones' verdict on Smith kicking the ball dead rather than playing on 2

Bongi comments to referee Mathew Carley panned

Shaun Edwards lift lids on England approach

Another Barrett excelling out of position

The Nigel Owens review of 'double movement' Sipili Falatea try

RugbyPass+

Ange Capuozzo fires up the Italian renaissance

Italy are on a roll, beating Wales, Samoa and Australia in 2022 with a young, ambitious squad and South Africa need to be wary

International News

Ireland star crowned the world's best male rugby player

England and Chile scoop up best try of the year awards

Black Ferns star and Italian fullback named Breakthrough Players of the Year

Trending Video

England fans are struggling to cope after another World Cup final loss | Sam Smith Reports | Rugby World Cup 2021

RugbyPass reporter Sam Smith talks to the fans after the Black Ferns stunned England 34-31 in the final at Eden Park.

More Videos

Latest Comments

I'm a Springbok supporter and believe that players must at all times be respectful towards a ref - end of the debate... Leave the talking to your captain. The real shocker is that no-one seems to be sense-checking World Rugby's statement issued on Thursday, that "Match officials are the backbone of the sport and without them there is no game." What BS!!?!?!? Amatuer players are the backbone of this sport, followed by the (paying) fans. All the money generated globally in the professional space has its roots in the amateur game. Match officials (and the administrators) are *__servants __* of the game. Average officials are very easy to replace. (lets not forget that International refs are paid professionals - not part time volunteers.) Why WR wants to give them "untouchable" status - I don't know? (Players & coaches don't get any protection) Perhaps it stems from guilt because WR are unable to fix these glaring problems? The gap between the top 10 teams globally has narrowed so much in recent years, that any test results can easily be swung on a single officiating blunder. @WR: Respect your players and fans. Fix the system, make officiateing easy, be more innovative and be more transparent. You're ruining a great game.

I don't really consider Steph to have been a loss, as his channel is usually free ground for advancement anyway. It's very optimistic, and certainly anything can happen, but nobody in their right minds can go frame by frame through these games and come away feeling like we are actually heading in the right direction. 

What an article.

The number of sycophants who surround SA rugby keeps impressing.