The upcoming match between the Boks and Clermont Auvergne
Haha haha! Labeale! The real question, should Patrice and Maxime start together? I've heard some grumblings from the Clermont faithful about the latter.
We've only won twice before at Stade Marcel, will be a tough one.
What a slide from the heady days of Philippe Waùgh and Georges Smith. It all depends of Rassie though, Mohammed Cheika will be crossing his fingers Damian gets the nod.
Clermont must start as favourites given they have the home advantage in Australia. The Boks might beat them in SA, but I doubt they will win in Austalia.
The attack is good, but maybe not good enough without improvements to the defence and breakdown
The SOS for Vermeulen appears to have been unanswered, so the back row is still looking poor. It seems that the Japanese clubs are very good at blocking the IRB regulations of releasing players.
Might be best to put Stephanie at 7 or even Mostert at 7 to add some bulk and options at the back of the lineout and scrum.
That could be the ticket.
Sure the top rugby analysts in the world - as claimed by one of them - are giving their expert opinions again so lets look at it from their perspective. Last test of each -
Du Toit - Tackles made - 19
Tackles missed - 1
Mostert - Tackles made - 5
Tackles missed - 2
The obvious case from them is that Mostert is a better tackler than Du Toit - how dare we ordinary mortals differ from them!!!!!
Mozart: "I'd play Mostert at 7, he is a far more mobile defend er than Du Toit"
Freifrau: "The obvious case from them is that Mostert is a better tackler"
Sure my lord the expert. Incidentally I am not a female - so please do not try and state I am.
I know what Mozart wrote - he can be as deceitful as you are when it comes to his pet hate players.
He is also the claimant that you, Pakie and him are top rugby analysts who identify problems no other experts could never do . So what choice do I really have than to say -
"The obvious case from them is that Mostert is a better tackler than Du Toit - how dare we ordinary mortals differ from them!!!!!"
Mozart
I am sure of one thing and that is that when playing at 7 Du To it was much better in defense than Mostert was. You obviously made up another fib on your side to make your latest statement. I hate lies - so can you please prove your statement by providing us with the stats on the matches they played at 7 to prove you did not post another lie on site.
FO dimwit. Lowest of the low in mankind.
Lets get this right oaks. One gets embarrassed when the oaks opt for Mostert at 7 before Du Toit. Somebody wanting to join the board will think nobody here knows anything about rugby!!!
So allow me simply to say that Du Toit is a world class 7 who has all the pace he needs to do the job. A real class act. Better than Juan Smith and in the Teuns Stoffberg mould. Wake up oaks as i said one gets embarrassed by these sort of comments!
Locks then should be Eben and Snyman.
Ive been a member for a while and I know no one knows squat about rugby on here (apart from the knowledgeable kiwis that is)
Most New Zealand fans have never played rugby. After being on the knitting team at school, this is their chance to look tough on rugby boards.
It is true that Steph lumbers around. He looks and plays as a lock, which is perplexing given that Pechmarie berated Alberts for being a cumbersome carthorse lock at 7. Besides, Steph looked good at lock, why move him somewhere where he is less potent?
Mozart
It is time that you apologize for the lie you spread above. Go and see what the stats were iro Du Toit in the Durban test against Argentina was.
If you do not apologize everyone on site will know exactly what you are and I will remined th em of it,..
Listen _ are you brain dead or what. BSter? You must be totally braindead to try and bring bench players in and then compare them with starting players. You are a deliberate liar anyway. What a farce you make of discussions on site.
Get of your deceitful conduct miscreant. .
1st test vs England:
Mostert 5/3Du Toit 12/3
3rd test vs England:
Mostert 19/3Du Toit 8/1
Total:
Mostert - 24/6Du Toit - 20/4
Most accurate performances this season:
Mostert 16/1 - first test vs EnglandDu Toit 19/1 - first test vs Argentina
I don't know what that's really supposed to tell us or why tackling stats is suddenly the be all and end all indicator of a player's work rate or mobility since a lot of these tackles probably take place around the fringes of set pieces and breakdowns (among other variables beyond a player's control, like the side the attacking team chooses to go versus the side the player is lining up on), but it's much more fair to both players as a comparison than simply picking their last test.
Mozart
As per normal your argument is prejudiced unproved personally invented BS, What the hell is process tackles - you stupid fraud?
According to you "process" tackles are made by your pet hate players - missed tackles only becomes applicable wh en made by that category of players,
Your rating is as Seb said so useless that it is totally worthless, because it is based solely on whether you can throw in enough lies and deceit to discredit players. Your fraud about the issue of Louw (making worse mistakes than Du Toit made in one test) is just another example of how your sick mind works..
Just a remark - Mostert played at flank in how many tests to sustain your latest BS statement? .
Pakie
Same BS as per normal - you know exactly how to continue the BS started by Mozart. The discredited three was exactly exposed by Seb - who clearly said BS is tall thatc an be expected from Mozart, AgainBSter and you.
What a tragedy and farce you three manage to make of this site.
You took Mostert's worst defensive stats (wherever you got that nonexistent 5/2 stat from) and compared it to Steph's best defensive stats for the year.
Spot the difference? Of course you don't.
I took one example to deal with Mozart's BS and now it suddenly becomes a means to attack one of your pet hate players. Your stand on all player are very clear. You have favourites and pet hate players. You slant things accordingly.
In the third test against England Du Toit played at 7 and Mostert at 5 - s wonderful comparison to start off with. Players should be evaluated playing in the same position - not in different positions.
Not interested anymore in whatsoever Mozart, AgainBSter and you come up with - it is s Seb wrote slanted BS based on prejudice. .
We have insufficient relevant data for Mostert at 7. That's why using stats in the first place to make a point here is inadequate and nowhere near conclusive, and it merely becomes a matter of opinion. Things will become clearer if Mostert ever gets proper game time at 7.
As Mozart said, this is simply an agree to disagree issue.
I don't see how I slanted anything against anyone by presenting both players' stats accurately and also highlighting their best stats. Perfectly fair. Now let's stop this tedious nonsense and move on.
Juan Smith was a wonderful player and everyone I know held him in high regard, so I'm not sure where you're getting your info from?
Your thumb perhaps?
It certainly looks as though you rely heavily on him as a source.
Er, who are you talking to, Dragon?
Dragon seems to have developed a fondness for Augenöffner...almost like they were old friends.
This forum has way too many bromances going on.
Sorry!
Augenoffner.
Thought it wa s obvious!
Dragon/Kombuis/Ndabagini/Trad is a troll. Very obvious. Makes very simple reading errors to chum the waters. He is fishing for an argument.
A troll? Really? Is that what you think of me? A chummer of waters?
No!! I'm here to help you Augi! You seem so lost. So confused!
I would have thought that a little gratitude would be in order.


