FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  There is something amiss in the Sharks Team

There is something amiss in the Sharks Team

Started by clevermike3 REPLIES138 VIEWS· 22 Mar 2014, 22:09
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Mar 2014, 22:09
#1
22 Mar 2014, 22:09#1

I cannot lay my finger on it entirely - but there are something amiss in the team.   The first problem I saw the last two games have been Kankowski.   He was non=productive last week and wicked this week.   Frankly I was disgusted by what he produced tonight.


Then there is the Sharks backline - something is seriously amiss there.   I think the real problem is from Positions 9 to 12.   The problem tonight was that Reinach was injured and replaced early. Mcleod service was not really acceptable.   He repeatedly passed the ball to the loosies resulting in minimal benefits - the latter lost the ball at least 7 times with serious negative consequences for the Sharks, and gave away penalties as well.   He seemed to be  totally clueless about reading of the game and what to do next.   In this particular case Reinach's injury cost the Sharks dearly.


Swiel tried his utmost under very poor conditions.The experience he gained today would help him in future.  He was solid in all aspects of the game. 


I have heard so mucg in the past about Steyn;s massive ball carrying abilities but once again nothing of that tonight - matter of fact there has been none since the first Super 15 game this year.   Where he was severely criticized by the commentators tonight was kicking possession away When there was a turnover in possession and they were in the Bulls half already.   Not impressed at all.   He is good in kicking at goal - but the rest of his game is sub-par/  Was it for instance necessary for him to give away a penalty straight in front of the posts in the final few minutes of the game?       

SH
ShezzaPro2,471 posts
22 Mar 2014, 22:27
#2
22 Mar 2014, 22:27#2
Mike, you're using every opportunity to slate Steyn yet you fail to realise that the whole Sharks outfit was poor today. You mention his runs and how ineffective they were, yet players like Bismarck, Albert and Coetzee barely got over the gain themselves. 

Maybe it was Steyn who kept the Sharks in the game with his goal kicking, his last penalty was awesome.

You also contradict yourself. You mention how Mcleod kept passing the ball to the forwards, this means the backs had very little ball. Mcleod kept passing the ball to the forwards so they could set up a platform, but they were getting beaten back by the Bulls. 

This match wasn't so much the Sharks losing it, but the Bulls winning it. Inexperiance and playing the Bulls game against the Bulls cost them, half of the returned kicks from the Sharks should've been run. 
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,297 posts
22 Mar 2014, 22:53
#3
22 Mar 2014, 22:53#3
Yes the Sharks should have kept the ball in hand. The Bulls clearly had a superior lineout so kicking should be avoided. 
The Sharks had a much better scrum and should rather have kept the ball in hand, even if they knocked on they could put the Bulls scrum under pressure and get penalties or tightheads  
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,297 posts
22 Mar 2014, 22:53
#4
22 Mar 2014, 22:53#4
.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news