There's a tell....banned again

[#2000] You are not allowed to visit this community

You have to love these immature mopes who are the Fuehrers at Supersupporter. After the brief fracas with Vlagman, conducted totally tongue in cheek.....the poor dopes have banned me again!

From time to time I have popped over to get the views of posters like Barnacle, who I respect. But I couldn't post after having my account deleted nano seconds after I said I was leaving the site. So I was unable to respond to any messages. I was also banned from seeing the site content, then unbanned, now banned again.

Simply for being so seditious as to be critical. For the tongue in cheek suggestion that they give me back the seed money I provided.

It reminds me of the CENSORS of old. It was often more fun at the movies seeing what the CENSORS had missed, than watching the movie. When a huge roar broke out in the theatre during a serious passage, it was the delightful discovery of yet another passage our moral guardians had totally flubbed. Nothing is more laughable than fellas who grant themselves the moral high ground, while missing the context.

I guess poor old Ceradyne issued a damning report, but he missed the joke. Literal is as literal does.

Immature is a very kindly word to use Moz. When will they grow up!!!! I think it has something to do with needing a sense of power. Perhaps in reaal life they feel powerless?

its like being locked away behind closed ddors and to scared to let anyone take a peek. It reeks of meaaness of spiritas well. Fundamentally the problem is one of integrity. This is the basic lesson they need to learn.

well I hope you are not too heartbroken and of course welcome to the club.

Ou vlagman clearlry gave you a bad report. Hell will free over before they are allowed back would beou H's trumpet to the board. Those who are not complete herders must wonder at all this nonsensoa

They monitor this board 24/7 and I just hope the addy's etc are secure as who knows what they might get up to!

Anyhow an open invitation to the more intelligent posters who love rugby to join us here. The bad apples/mongs best stay where they are as they will not be able to follow the debates here.

Hahahahahahhahahahhahahahahhaha. Very funnny it all is. Moz the bandit banned! Who would believe it.

Victims of a previous era...Arrogant, Verkrampt and Kragdadig. Nothing new there. Try not to feel sorry for them though Bwhaahahahahaha

The terrifying sense of losing control.

Spot on....it's fear driven..

 Moz, I will have a word with that lot, its pathetic that they dont let you back there. That site lacks clout without you. 

 Moz, I will have a word with that lot, its pathetic that they dont let you back there. That site lacks clout without you.  It could do with Cards leftfield takes and Beeno obsession with weight

Thanks Dave, but I wont be back. I like the focus on rugby here, and the international participation. I do find their  paranoia entertaining though. It's odd I always liked Hawk, he seemed like a sensible fellow. Then he became the fuehrer......and changed his persona.

I had it the other way around with Barlee being a really decent fella and  always thought Hawk to be kragdadig, verkrampt  and a panic merchant. Now that they're joint owners they'd have to be equally responsible for their actions. Nevertheless it's an all too familiar attitude symptomatic of a previous era....if you don't get your way then come down hard, if you still don't get your way then come down even harder ....it's the only way they know. How sad.

I had a read of the Verboten Plaas, what a turnaround by the hate mongers, they've actually had some decent things to say about the Stormers. Led by the Alpha Stormer hater, Duke, it's a shock to the system. Keep that up and I'd be kicking and screaming to get back on there again Bwhahahaha Now all that's needed is for Adolph to ban complimentary posts about the Stormers Bwhahahahaa

A question. If all of you despise that place so much, why do you keep trying to re-register there?

I tried to reregister barron because I wanted to invite all the Stormer knockers to come and apologise here. as was right and proper  Hahahahahahhahaha, I was also curious to find out whether they were still all bitter and twisted or had time helped them get over themselves.

Look even if they went on their knees and begged us to come back it wouldn't be likely to happen. Here the Mod has been excellent so why should we dessert him? secondly we have a number of guys that have joibned here  why should we dessert them. Thirdly the board is flourishing why go back to what is lessor. Finallly, and the crunch, is why go back to build up a board where one can be banned at the drop of a hat. Where it is simply stated this is my house and if you don't like it bugger off as was said to some - not to me. Where its that's the way it will be end of story. Where adults and folk senior in this world are treated with zero respect.where preferential treatment are given to the herders as was experienced by Moz.

I was banned a number of times, four in all, three were over turned as being unjust. The final one as a consequence of a broken undertaking by H. I tried to get a reason but no reply - after over 12,000 posts It think it was and not even the courtesy of a reply as to why the undertaken had been broken!!. Moz got attacked in a scurrilious fashion which was supported by the powers that be. Now why go back to all that rubbish. Why would any sane person do that

Yes I liked a number of folk there and worked hard to prevent a split (even thought I was getting on with H and B). Yes they are missed but unfortunately bad choices were made and now ss board is seriously suffering. However going back will not be happening.Why subject oneself to this nonsense. They can join us  (and have been) we will not be joining them. In any event this last baning of Moz illustrates the lack of maturity and meaness of spirit. Fancy not allowing him to read the posts if he wants to!!!! Pathetic really.

Here ou vlagman (ceradyne) can post if he chooses to do so. Nobody is prevented from viewing and only BL was banned for tampering with the system and reappered with the knowledge of the mod as brycy and I believe is still with us!

so baron, whoever you are from ss board, consider the above.  Also I suggest you name yourself. Dont kid yourself about folk wanting to go back!!!! Nothing could be further from the truth.There has been no change of heart there that could make that even remotely possible. Trust has been broken.

 Well...first of all, the first time you we're banned from the SS board was for posting an entirely inappropriate comment in the wake of the ChCh earthquake - you subsequently begged for forgiveness on Keo once you realised that SS was probably the only place on the net that would tolerate you, certainly not Keo where you were getting your arse kicked every 5 minutes.

SS is a boring read now without the 'old' campaigners Moz, Denny, Dave...even Rooinek, all diversity of opionion seems to have been weeded out of the place - at times it was a soap opera but that's what made it interesting.  However I'm not sure if you added any value Beeno, which is most likely why they're not listening to you begging to be let back on.

The Baron

A fair question deserves a fair answer. I tried to re-register only to be rejected because of my comments on this site regarding die Verboten Plaas. I was simply trying to establish whether the powers that be had matured enough and were big enough to bury the past. In effect nothing has changed. I won't be making a song and dance about their stance and have no fear of their posters signing up on here. This site has proven itself strong and resilient enough to accomodate anyone and everyone. Subject matter closed, over and out.

Well Baron I have never tried to re-register, nor will I in future. But there are guys like Blikkies, Barnacle and others who I have posted with for many a year. They all had their unique perspectives which I enjoy.

Unfortunately something which started with so much promise degenerated into something rather nasty and intolerant.

"SS is a boring read now without the 'old' campaigners Moz, Denny, Dave...even Rooinek, all diversity of opionion seems to have been weeded out of the place - at times it was a soap opera but that's what made it interesting. "

So true poi-e....mind you I can look back now on those days and have a quiet chuckle. Boy did we have fun!!!

A fair answer. However, perhaps a better approach would have been to make peaceful overtures prior to trying to register. If such had happened, the SS posters who also visit here would have noted this and reported back. After all there has only been vitriol and bad-mouthing about that site and the posters there.

Just a thought.

Duke er Baron.....nice try.

Nice try at what? And you are incorrect. Anyway the point at issue here is why you people tried to return. Fair answers were received, so lets be civil and stop bad-mouthing our site here. You are happy here and we are happy there. We have not tried to recruit new members from here so quit with the lousy comments.

Peace

How hard is it to grasp......I never tried to return, nor did anybody else except for Beeno. Beeno is a good hearted soul that always sees the positives.  I am not so charitable and I am perfectly contented here.

So let me repeat this again....I will never post on Super Supporter again....comprende?

Mozart,

Yes, I comprende.

Please be aware that I saw your un-edited post about Duke and the slanderous comment you made. I'll be sure to pass it on.

You see, you still miss the point. We dont really want any of the quartet back. All that we do require is the halting of all the undesirable comments that are made by the same quartet. Should it not stop, rest assured there is plenty of public ammunition cached away that will be posted here. Comprehende?

Mozart,I have to agree with my blue-blooded compadres that you are neither wanted nor needed on Supersport.

You are the weakest link. Goodbye.  

My comment was not slanderous, slander is " a malicious false statement about a person". My statement, which I chose to remove is not false. Your own members,  Becs who received the pornographic e-mail sent by Duke, and Dave who was in on the debate can attest to this. I gave Duke the benefit of the doubt. I was wrong.

As for your threat, which would meet the definition of blackmail, I am not surprised you would take this approach. It's so typical of the leadership of SS (so aptly abbreviated) and your approach.

Who are you Barlee, Hawk, whoever....hiding behind a new  name....coward.

Ya Viscnt and Baron, why hide behind new alter egos, when your original nics are also secret id's? What is the problem, man up guys.

Right, so its simple really. Just ask your compadres to lay off the insults and you will hear no more from us. Easy peasy.

 Klop

You guys bored or what? "Easy peasy."..lol. Takes me back a bit.

I would have thought that any respectable internet site acts to protect the identity and information of it's participants. And here we have site leadership threatening to release confidential information. If there is a more eloquent exposition of why SS is not a site to post on, I can't think of one.

You misunderstood me Mozart. No one has threatened to release confidential information. That is the lowest of the low and anyway I have no access to such material. I'm talking about general stuff that was posted on open sites for anyone to see. You see, some of the quartet have brazenly spewed all sorts of nasty stuff about our site on this forum. They took the moral high ground yet some of the things they posted on our site and others such as Keo, defies belief.

So all I ask is that the nonsense stop. Keep it clean and whatever was said on the other site will remain that way.

 So the fear is that the "confidential information" might prove to be embarrassing?

Grow up children. My dad is stronger than yours.

Shame poor old Taipan, he never could get it. Confidential is exactly what it purports to be....information that two parties agree will be kept out of the public domain. Anticipating exactly this kind of churlish threat, however, everything I provide a site, is written to with this in mind.

It's just sobering to actually be threatened....no matter how many retractions or explanations will now follow...it was clear the first time around. An absolute embarrassment for SS.

 Gottim. He'e s gawn.

Mozart, I have never, ever had any pornographic e-mails sent to me by Duke, please do not repeat the claim that I have. This is not me being argumentative or unpleasant to you at all,  I just do not wish to have such a falsehood attributed to me. Thank you.

" My comment was not slanderous, slander is " a malicious false statement about a person". My statement, which I chose to remove is not false. Your own members,  Becs who received the pornographic e-mail sent by Duke, "

Nice one mozzie babe

This is rather odd becs. I recall the heated debate started by you and Dave as to whether Duke sent you pornography. A debate that had denny and I giving Duke the benefit of the doubt. And your close friend Dave says I am not lying. Very odd, as was your rapid appearance on this string.

I also recall the whole outcry you made about the unsolicited photos duncan  (dorkie dumbo- alias duke) sent to you of himself. Apparently they were disgustiing and upset you very much Becs. That is my honest recall of the whole debacle. Dave defended you and I remember standing up for you as well. I think if Dave could have got his hands on wee duncan it would have been the end of the oak. I als orememebr the support duncan got from elements on the board. Same on them!

As for ss baord not disclosing personal details why were my details disclosed both on ss baord and on Keo, the name of my boss etc. Bwahahahaha please try telling the truth for just once.

Could these two plebs, baron and vickie (bored to death by their own stupidity) please creep back from whence they came and stop poluting this aboard with their lamatable comments.

Please give my regards to wee duncan, his website pictures crack me up. The twit looks flatter than a surboard! Hahahahahhahaha

Please note baron and vickie you are allowed to post here. Also note Moz has been barred from even viewing your site. Says it all really. No one wans to go back t oss board to make a home there. The home belongs to B andH and they make that point abundantly clear in any case. Here we feel much more at home and enjoy the liberty and abscence of threat.

Peaceful overtures. I was banned after an undertaking by my friend (Hawker - I thought he was a friend) dispite an undertaking he had given. When I asked for a reason I got no reply.  Pathetic stuff from ss board .

Great pity it didn' t work out but you will have to accept your fate.  Sorry but the oaks made a choice preferring bad apples to the quartet, preferring flasehood to integrity  - the scurrilous attack on Moz for example . So enjoy ou bedpan, fireman and dorkie - hahahahahahahaha what a trade off!!!!

I do trust Mod your security measures are up to date as we don't want another site attack as we experienced shortl yafter we arrived here? Who knows who that was and from whence he/they came!

I was also banned from the site and was not given a reason. I have to say Hawk was very helpful but at the time Barlee was The Man!! and if you disagreed with him Oh dear. I was never rude or hurtful to anyone I think, correct me if I am wrong.

I also remember the porngate saga but I will say no more!.

How many more times do you have to make unfalse accusations, Mozart ? For the last time, I have NEVER had any pornographic e-mails from Duke. It's amazing how you use the assumption to attack me at one point and then to defend yourself at another. I would call that hypocrisy. If you have a problem with any of these people, do not use me or anything you believe to be true about me, to make a point. You were wrong back then and you are wrong now.

And as for you, Beeno, grow up. Yes, I was upset and Dave knows full well why I was so upset by those things being said about me back then. I did not start the discussion about unsolicited photos ( see that, Mozart, PHOTOS, not E-MAILS ) and you all jumped in like you always do and made things up....disgusting, were they, Beeno ? Really ? Given that at no time was I ever sent any pornographic pictures by anyone, there was simply a suggestion that photos would/could be sent. I have photos....ON A ( broken ) PHONE, Mozart ( NON PORNOGRAPHIC )....that also contains the last pictures of my Grandmother before she died. If it hadn't contained those pictures of her, it would have been in the bin long ago, trust me. At no time has anyone been shown pictures on that phone, something I was also accused of doing. As I said at the time, Dave would not know Duke if he fell over him in the street....naked or otherwise.

I would be offended if anyone wanted to send me pictures like that and I would tell them so. Duke was not to know that I had been raped in the recent past, which is why I was so very uncomfortable at the mere suggestion of that sort of thing, and he also was not to know that he used a term, when I declined to participate in that sort of thing, that my rapist had used againts me. I'm afraid I suffered rather a reaction to all that, it brought a lot of horrible memories back for me, again, something Duke had no knowledge of and is therefore, blameless of any malicious intent. That is why Dave reacted the way he did and, whilst I am grateful that he was so angry on my behalf, he also knows that I wish he hadn't been so vociferous as it really made matters a lot worse, in my opinion. But, he only did it with the best of intentions and I am grateful to him for that. He had my best interests at heart, as he always does ( except for when we argue about Rugby :) ) and I hope he won't mind me saying what I have just said.

I am used to you all making accusations about me that are untrue and I have not written any of this lightly, I find even thinking about certain events very painful indeed. But I will say again, Duke did not ever send me any pornographic emails or photos of any kind. That is the honest truth. And, whatever he did, was in no way malicious. I have no issues with Duke and hope he has none with me either.

You have all made an embarrassing and, painful for me at least, situation a great deal worse and I am asking you all to please stop this. It is like picking at a scab and not letting it heal.

If some of you have issues with the other site, so be it. Let them get on with things and they will, hopefully, let you all get on with things here. I just ask you to leave me out of it. I'm sure there are people here who are heartily sick of the whole situation and just want to talk Rugby in peace.

Moderators, I am sorry that I had to write all this in public. Please understand why I did so. Thank you.

Becs you lovely girl and of course I have no issue with what you have said - quite the opposite, for you have said it as it is. I should not have reacted as I did back then but it did anger me and I tend to shoot from the hip, especially when it comes to defending you.