FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Time for SA to catchup on contracting of players

Time for SA to catchup on contracting of players

Started by kingcorn3 REPLIES599 VIEWS· 29 Aug 2014, 16:34
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
KI
kingcornPro3,695 posts
29 Aug 2014, 16:34
#1
29 Aug 2014, 16:34#1

Just read an article about the welsh rugby union mess and that end is nearly in sight in term of them agreeing on what to do next going forward. What I gathered the outcome to be:

-          Welsh rugby union will be investing £60 million pounds in the four provinces over 5 years.

-          Only 6 foreign players will be allowed per province.

-          Introduction of dual contracts. Players on welsh contracts will be managed by the WRFU and get priority on test matches falling out of the window

-          They will not include players that play outside the country and will only for exceptional circumstances make an acceptance.  

I think that SA can take something from as Australia are doing something similar in try to keep their talent at home.

I recently wrote about the average age of our current bok squad and the most startling fact is that there is a 10 age year gap in each position.

What SA need to is to look after the players in the middle, hopefully our super rugby teams will do better and we will have a more competitive teams not just 2 teams every year towing the line or whichever union wants to dig deep into their pockets.

My solution would be is to ensure that talent are spread around across the provinces more eavenly and that we don’t end up with one union having 3 hookers that are test quality.

I would cast the central contracting net wider and implement a grading structure in that if you fall under the category A you will be highest paid and if you are C you are lower paid. I would ensure that there are long term contracts of 3 to 5 years. A player can be downgraded or upgraded depending on form and appearances for the national team. If you are a squad player for the boks then it would an automatic B.

A province can also offer the player with a contract to maintain their services and based it on whether they will be playing super rugby or currie cup or both.

In addition I would allow for Sabbaticals abroad, but these players will be managed by South Africa and the clubs will have to negotiate it with the union.

What I’m looking for is that SA rugby will look after the player’s well fare and work load.

That way we can ensure that our best players are conditioned and not played into the ground.  

I think that players such as Jannie and Bismark have been extremely poorly managed and almost feel like that Jake had an alternative agenda as to the national team. Frans Steyn all of a sudden developed chronic knee pain and need to be managed, but then played one match and disappear due to contract disputes but ended up playing all the games for the sharks and almost every single minute. Both Jannie and Bismark was used excessively for the sharks.

Jake is not the only culprit, the bulls over played Victor, Stormes do the same with Jean and a few others.

So somebody has to take control and I think Saru need to start dishing out central contracts. Start Contracting players that graduate from the under 20 world cup. You don’t have to choose all, just the best of the bunch. That way we will have a steady flow of talent coming through and being retained and none of our youngsters disappearing at the age of 21 – 24.

My aim would be to try and hold on to good players up to the age of 26.  

GT
Gonzo the GreatClub Pro560 posts
29 Aug 2014, 16:47
#2
29 Aug 2014, 16:47#2
 the age gap is because of peter dom idiot not developing the team over 4 years and playing the main xv into the ground. 4 years is a lot of time and now meyer is having to juggle very carefully. he tried alot of youngsters that quite frankly did tuff all so many that the fans bittched for..

problem with the super coaches is that the comp is just too damn big and you cant afford to lose a single game. you cant say ah well here are the lions so we can have a weeks rest... its suicide. the comp needs to be cut in half and a bigger gap between it and the home tours. i think dropping the knock out rounds would be great too a straight league is by far the best way to go. i say that boks should be out of the currie cup too. no need for them there.
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
29 Aug 2014, 17:24
#3
29 Aug 2014, 17:24#3
 Saying that there is a need to spread players evenly among unions/franchises sounds just dandy until you realise that they are human beings with their own needs and preferences and not commodities that can be shifted around like pieces on a chess board.

That would also mean that Union/Franchise X no longer have to make sure that they really look after their players because the players have no say since they were "placed" there by "their masters" and the masters will see to it that if such players pss off or loose form/interest the "masters" will see to it that such union/franchise do not loose out on quality players.

Imagine the Stormers having an excellent scrumhalf and the discover and develop another one who they then have as their back-up and SARU decides to "place" him with the Sharks because the Sharks are thin on scrumhalves

KI
kingcornPro3,695 posts
29 Aug 2014, 18:37
#4
29 Aug 2014, 18:37#4
 Cere, I think that you got the cat by the tail. My intentions are actually the opposite. I'm stating that we want to make sure that all the players get enough game time and that they can only do that if the top 5 players are evenly distributed. I have also stated a dual contract where by the the provinces will have to offer the player a contract to. If SARU contracted 5 players in each position,  that is 75 central contracted players by SA Rugby. It is in the players own interest to get game time and we will see to extend the talent drain that some provinces go through. Saru will also need to bring in a grading system to state who is number 1 - 5. But at least we would have enough players in key positions, that is use to the national structure and get fit in easily. 
At the moment we have players leaving so that they can get a chance to get into the springbok team. Look at Taute, he had no reason the leave the Lions, but decided to pack his bags because that meant that only players in winning team gets noticed for the boks. 
Not to long ago the bulls had 22 players in the bok squad. How can one union field 22 players to the bok squad when there are only 15 starting positions. 

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news