FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  TMOs

TMOs

Started by hakwa1 REPLIES198 VIEWS· 13 Mar 2012, 02:00
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
13 Mar 2012, 09:21
#1
13 Mar 2012, 09:21#1

 Lions coach John Mitchell on Monday said he would file a formal complaint against assistant match officials who were involved in his side's Super Rugby match against the Sharks in Durban over the weekend..


He hit out at some of the decisions made by referee Mark Lawrence's assistants, Quinton Immelman, Marc van Zyl and Television Match Official (TMO) Johann Meuwesen in Saturday's game.

"They won't change the result, but clearly [the officials] need to be accountable at this level,” he said.

Mitchell said on Monday he could not see any reason why TMOs could not be granted additional powers.

He felt they should be able to review the build-up to a try rather than only what happens in front of the line.

"I think we should increase the TMO's power to go back from the tryline, back to where play started," he said.

"The law goes back to the point of where play started, which is correct, whether it is a scrum or a lineout."

He said rugby had technology at its disposal and to ask the TMO to review play a few movements back would not slow down the cadence of a match by much.

His call for the International Rugby Board (IRB) to review the powers of the TMO is part of a growing chorus on this issue.

Last week, South African referees' manager André Watson weighed into the debate after the Super Rugby clash between the Cheetahs and Bulls a fortnight ago.

A try by Bulls prop Dean Greyling was awarded despite video evidence of a double movement leading to the try.

While the video evidence suggested it was not a try, the problem lay in the match referee Craig Joubert's question to the TMO, who was coincidentally also Meuwesen.

He asked Meuwesen only if there was any reason not to award the try as he was unaware of the double movement.

Meuwesen could, however, only officiate on the grounding of the ball in that situation and not the earlier indiscretion.

It is believed that if greater powers were to be granted to TMOs it would negate injustices such as these.

Watson told Die Burger he hoped extra powers would be granted to the TMOs and the system could be on trial as early as in this year's Currie Cup competition.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
13 Mar 2012, 12:17
#2
13 Mar 2012, 12:17#2

Quite frankly the situation is so bad with not only genuine mistakes but with bent refs that anything that results in a fair decision has to be welcomed. To see sides like the Cheetahs, fighting for survival, being robbed of  a deserved win is not on.

Good on Mitchell these guys need to be held accountble and the bad eggs removed. Performance of officials should be closely monitored and expanations demanded of biased refs. There is NO place in th game or biased refs.

The question is which down under refs would surive such a regime. Hahahahhahahaha  - they would have to import refs from elsewhere an admit they lack the ethical qualities to do the job.  Hardly likely of course!

But before I roll off my chair in stiches I have to be honest and say we have a few problems here - notably bulle refs Joubert and Jonkers.  For the Stomers to beat the bulle when either of these two gentlemen ref is well nigh impossible. For France to beat the mediocre abs in the WC final with Joubert reffing was also well nigh impossible although almost achieved.

Beeno cooly objective as usual.

 

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news