FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  To Sa sides struggling to score tries

To Sa sides struggling to score tries

Started by Beeno12 REPLIES120 VIEWS· 15 Apr 2013, 15:47
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
15 Apr 2013, 15:47
#1
15 Apr 2013, 15:47#1

Rob Houwing, Sport24 chief writer Cape Town – The South African conference in Super Rugby currently boasts the worst record of the three groups for total tries scored ... but the best for preventing them.

 The halfway mark of the ordinary season will be reached next weekend for the vast majority of teams in the competition, who will make their eighth appearances of the 16 to be completed ahead of the knockout stage. At this stage, the SA conference sports a total of 73 tries, which is nine down on the Australian one (82), and as many as 24 behind the New Zealand conference (97).

Slightly more comforting news is that between them the five South African franchises have leaked the fewest: only 78 as opposed to the NZ 81 and the Aussie 93.

The stats are likely to fuel domestic critics who suspect our culture, generally, remains to be too obsessed with taking the ball into contact when in possession, rather than probing for holes or bringing outside backs into regular play, and also putting in large amounts of “heavy hits” on defence, which can be tiring and carry an extra risk of injury.

At least two of the traditionally more competitive SA sides in Super Rugby, the Sharks and Stormers, have unenviable injury tallies at present – they were at well less than full strength respectively in last weekend’s Newlands derby, won 22-15 by the home team.Also to consider is that although the Sharks still boss the conference and stand third on the overall table under tourney rules, they are actually placed a mere fifth (on 26 points) for log points earned – behind all of the Brumbies (33), Reds (31), Chiefs (29) and Blues (27).

The Durban-based team, despite their conference superiority, also stand alongside compatriots the Stormers and Bulls for showing the worst “tries for” record of all 15 teams (Please note Muncher): 13 each from seven matches. Even glaring wooden-spoonists the Highlanders, yet to win a game, have managed 14 touch-downs, whilst surprise packages the Kings are also comfortably ahead of the supposed “SA big three” in that department with 16. New Zealand pace-setters the Chiefs and Blues lead the try-scoring charge with 23 each. Always among the best organised sides defensively these days, the Stormers (though still only 11th overall) continue to shine for keeping opponents out – they lead the way with only nine tries against them, closely followed by the Sharks on 10. Try-scoring “for and against” ratios by South African teams, from top conference team to bottom: 1 Sharks: 13-10 2 Cheetahs: 18-19 3 Bulls: 13-16 4 Stormers 13-9 5 Kings 16-24

Everyone will agree we need to improve on attack. Defence though is sound. This too tends to make nz try scoring a bit flattering.

What one has to realise though is that it is difficult for Meyer to get an attack going when our top sides are not scroing to many tries.

Those still cussing the Stormers out need to look at the beam in their own eye.

 

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
15 Apr 2013, 16:12
#2
15 Apr 2013, 16:12#2

Beeno

This article is 100 correct.  It is a malady in SA rugby stemming from out-dated game plans and horrible mangling of the backline performances of SA teams.   The only differnce is that despite the disclaimer in the article - the defending stats indicated that the Stormers defence has gone down badly - whilst the Sharks defence has improved and the Bulls defence is 50-50 - no real change from last year.

The Stormers defence has deterirorated basically because of two players - Jantjies and De Jongh.   Their stats are bad:-

 *   Jantjies         -      Tackles made      30      -  Tackles missed     9

 *   De Jongh      -      Tackles made      24     -   Tackles missed     8

The above despite the efforts of Nienaber to improve defensive standards in the game.

The lack pf tries stemmed from the  jaded game plan so strongly advanced by Meyer but discarded years ago even by NH teams.   The way SA teams played with regard to their backlines all stemmed from that core problem.   It really is sickening to see what is going on in this case.   

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
15 Apr 2013, 16:38
#3
15 Apr 2013, 16:38#3

Mike I think things are improving. Both the sharks and the Mighty Stormers have very good players missing. Once they are back the tries should increase in these two franchises at least.

The trouble is we also have frot coaches and great ones sitting on the sidelines. Solomons is a good coach as is Naka. I dont think ou plum is the greatest though and even more so  Alistair and Ludeke. How much better off would we have been with guys of the caliber of Rassie, Jake, Mallet and Venter  coaching. How about a few foreign backline coaches?

It is shocking to think we at WP have lost Solomons, Mallet and Rassie! No decent coach will stay here. Why?

 

 

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news