FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Two remarkable ref calls

Two remarkable ref calls

Started by Mozart7 REPLIES241 VIEWS· 15 Mar 2014, 20:51
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
15 Mar 2014, 20:51
#1
15 Mar 2014, 20:51#1

Firstly the yellow against Willie. If you look at the angle of his hands, they were up ...pointed up. He made a genuine attempt to knock the ball up. Certainly it also prevented the pass, but was it any different to many other interception attempts. I think not...does the attempt have to be a certainy? Then to rule it wasn't a penalty try, because supposedly the cover could have gotten there, when the potential receiver was all on his own and a metre from the line...just compounded the farce.



Secondly the near try by Charl McLeod. Apart from the obvious non grounding....what about the Mvovo knock. It went back? Amazing. Mvovo dropped the ball at least two metres ahead of ahead of where he first touched it, without it ever being under control. Sure it eventually got slapped back as he wrestled with it....but only after it had gone much further forward.


Combine that with the  Chiefs first try after the half, and we had the usual list of ref blunders.



HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
16 Mar 2014, 00:11
#2
16 Mar 2014, 00:11#2
 Mozie, I believe you are mistaken about Willie. Yes he was trying to intercept instead of deliberately trying to knock the ball down, yes he did not deserve a yellow BUT no the angle of his offending right hand was DOWN instead of up.

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
16 Mar 2014, 03:56
#3
16 Mar 2014, 03:56#3
I thought  his palm was turned up, ie to knock the ball  up. But I'll take another look Hakwa... you seem convinced and that's usually good enough for me.
OI
oimateyPro1,870 posts
16 Mar 2014, 05:17
#4
16 Mar 2014, 05:17#4
MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
16 Mar 2014, 14:06
#5
16 Mar 2014, 14:06#5
surprise surprsie, no mention of van wyks try vs the blues, then again i shouldnt be too surprised, incorrect calls against saffa teams are a travesty, while incorrect calls against kiwis are unimportant.
but no worries, being impartial and being a great rugby player are two things saffas are not known for, LMFAO,

but regarding that try, the ref incorrectly awarded a try to the lions on the 60th minute mark when van wyk scored the lions 3rd try.

1), the ball was a clearly knocked on by van rensberg, saffa commentators all agreed with this too, but simple logic should have been applied.

2) the last pass which van rensberg got before knocking it on was from whitley, who passed 5 meters before the blues 10meter line and van rensberg catches the ball on the 10 meter line.

not sure how the ref could have screwed up the knock on thats a bit of a head scratcher, but the forward pass i can understand, as that happens more often then not.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
16 Mar 2014, 17:36
#6
16 Mar 2014, 17:36#6
Come now Sushi, I haven't even seen the Blues game....can we elevate the discussion above simple gang loyalty.  
RE
redsmanPro1,710 posts
17 Mar 2014, 05:18
#7
17 Mar 2014, 05:18#7

 While we're at it Reds too were screwed by hometown saffa reffing... we've come to expect this now...


Not saying the Reds were god enough to win it they dropped the ball just before the tryline too many times to deserve to win but....


Maybe they're trying to get back at us for teaching them who really dominates the cricket... haha lol  - see the 20/20 too....??





RE
redsmanPro1,710 posts
17 Mar 2014, 05:18
#8
17 Mar 2014, 05:18#8

 While we're at it Reds too were screwed by hometown saffa reffing... we've come to expect this now...


Not saying the Reds were goo d enough to win it they dropped the ball just before the tryline too many times to deserve to win but....


Maybe they're trying to get back at us for teaching them who really dominates the cricket... haha lol  - see the 20/20 too....??





— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news