CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
07 Jun 2016, 20:34#1
The SA Under 20 team in the first half tied to emulate the pathetic Meyer team last year in the game between SA and Japan in the World Cup. They were pathetic and at halftime another Japan win looked likely. However, in the second half they started to play more comprehensive rugby and scored 5 tries to win convincingly. At least they did not disgrace SA like Meyer's team did.
LUlunatic
Club Pro305 posts
07 Jun 2016, 21:37#2
The second half was a much better affair - those Bokkies will need to be much sharper on the soft-skills if they plan to win any of the bigger teams like England, Australia or New Zealand. But first they need to win their pool...
Mike, Meyer is now water under the bridge and a new era has arrived. AC presents the likes of you with new targets.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
08 Jun 2016, 09:14#3
First half had me thinking this Baby Bok side was a joke but they redeemed themselves in a big way. Hall is one hell of a 9 in terms of service...what a pass he has on him both ways giving his 10 room to move.
Davids at 6 looks good. The starting props were crap replacements far better. Wiese the flank playing lock is good but should be playing 7.
Libbok at 10 looks creative as does Bosch at 15. Did not like the crash ball tactics employed by the 12 s used. Move on Theron.
Dash the one wing looks a real talent great steps off both feet.
The test will come in their next two games against the Argies and France
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
08 Jun 2016, 10:12#4
There were a few bad eggs in the team - to name them S’busiso Nkosi, Junior Pokomela and Kwenzo Blose - obviously BEE selections - with Tango Balekile not too hot either, Nkosi was totally useless and the other three was the cause of constant ball possession losses. The scrumming by the Juniors was poor and I think the prop and hooker listed above was the problem.
MAMachiavelli
Club Pro323 posts
MAMachiavelliClub Pro323 posts
08 Jun 2016, 12:08#6
"First half had me thinking this Baby Bok side was a joke but they redeemed themselves in a big way. Hall is one hell of a 9 in terms of service...what a pass he has on him both ways giving his 10 room to move.
Davids at 6 looks good. The starting props were crap replacements far better. Wiese the flank playing lock is good but should be playing 7.
Libbok at 10 looks creative as does Bosch at 15. Did not like the crash ball tactics employed by the 12 s used. Move on Theron.
Dash the one wing looks a real talent great steps off both feet.
The test will come in their next two games against the Argies and France"
*********************************************************************************
Well balanced opinion - cannot fault it.
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
08 Jun 2016, 12:12#7
Dave, do you know if that Cobus Wiese lock is related to Kobus Wiese the Springbok? H e also looked pretty good with ball in hand.
Only two players to really impress me were Davids the #6 and Dash the #14.
MAMachiavelli
Club Pro323 posts
MAMachiavelliClub Pro323 posts
08 Jun 2016, 13:26#8
Rooinek - this kid is Cobus and GrootKoos is Kobus. I know the elder Wiese and this kid may be a distant relative but Groot Koos says he is not close family.
Qui te a few good ones, they need to work on coms and cohesion though.