FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Under 20 match Against Japan

Under 20 match Against Japan

Started by clevermike8 REPLIES386 VIEWS· 07 Jun 2016, 20:34
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
07 Jun 2016, 20:34
#1
07 Jun 2016, 20:34#1
The SA Under 20 team in the first half tied to emulate the pathetic Meyer team last year in the game between SA and Japan in the World Cup.  They were pathetic and at halftime another Japan win looked likely.  However, in the second half they started to play more comprehensive rugby and scored 5 tries to win convincingly.   At least they did not disgrace SA like Meyer's  team did.       
LU
lunaticClub Pro305 posts
07 Jun 2016, 21:37
#2
07 Jun 2016, 21:37#2
 The second half was a much better affair - those Bokkies will need to be much sharper on the soft-skills if they plan to win any of the bigger teams like England, Australia or New Zealand.  But first they need to win their pool...
Mike, Meyer is now water under the bridge and a new era has arrived.  AC presents the likes of you with new targets.  
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
08 Jun 2016, 09:14
#3
08 Jun 2016, 09:14#3
First  half had me thinking this Baby Bok side was a joke but they redeemed themselves in a big way. Hall is one hell of a 9 in terms of service...what a pass he has on him both ways giving his 10 room to move.
Davids at 6 looks good. The starting props were crap replacements far better. Wiese the flank playing lock is good but should be playing 7. 
Libbok at 10 looks creative as does Bosch at 15. Did not like the crash ball tactics employed by the 12 s used. Move on Theron.
Dash the one wing looks a real talent great steps off both feet.
The test will come in their next two games against the Argies and France 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
08 Jun 2016, 10:12
#4
08 Jun 2016, 10:12#4
 There were a few bad eggs in the team - to name them S’busiso Nkosi, Junior Pokomela and Kwenzo Blose -  obviously BEE selections - with Tango Balekile not too hot either,  Nkosi was totally useless and the other three was the cause of constant ball possession losses.   The scrumming by the Juniors was poor and I think the prop and hooker listed above was the problem.    
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
08 Jun 2016, 11:57
#5
08 Jun 2016, 11:57#5

Pokomela is not big enough for a 8, got stripped far too easily. Blose and the hooker are useless.


I hear Nkosi is meant to be very good, so I am reserving judgement on him. He was not bad, solid at best.


Ward looks a bit light at 13 as well, will struggle against better sides.


Not yet convinced about this side  

MA
MachiavelliClub Pro323 posts
08 Jun 2016, 12:08
#6
08 Jun 2016, 12:08#6
 "First  half had me thinking this Baby Bok side was a joke but they redeemed themselves in a big way. Hall is one hell of a 9 in terms of service...what a pass he has on him both ways giving his 10 room to move.
Davids at 6 looks good. The starting props were crap replacements far better. Wiese the flank playing lock is good but should be playing 7. 
Libbok at 10 looks creative as does Bosch at 15. Did not like the crash ball tactics employed by the 12 s used. Move on Theron.
Dash the one wing looks a real talent great steps off both feet.
The test will come in their next two games against the Argies and France"
*********************************************************************************
Well balanced opinion - cannot fault it. 
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
08 Jun 2016, 12:12
#7
08 Jun 2016, 12:12#7
Dave, do you know if that Cobus Wiese lock is related to Kobus Wiese the Springbok? H e also looked pretty good with ball in hand.

Only two players to really impress me were Davids the #6 and Dash the #14.
MA
MachiavelliClub Pro323 posts
08 Jun 2016, 13:26
#8
08 Jun 2016, 13:26#8
 Rooinek - this kid is Cobus and GrootKoos is Kobus.  I know the elder Wiese and this kid may be a distant relative but Groot Koos says he is not close family.
Qui te a few good ones, they need to work on coms and cohesion though.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
08 Jun 2016, 13:38
#9
08 Jun 2016, 13:38#9

No, they said that he was not a relative of the big man


Hall at 9 was very good

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news