Useless CJ Stander man of the match

Yet again in that epic match - but according to one expert on here he is crap...oh boy Much like Jan Serfontein only being able to step inside....tell that to the speedy Jap wing that got done by a classic in out Roll on

Stampkar MOM....in what universe. Just his usual metre a run, no defenders beaten, not a teensy one in 20 carries....one ball lost. A bog standard South African power flank. Vunipola almost equalled his gain with a third of his runs. As for Steppie, wan't he supposed to be better than Jean by now. The Sunwolves, give me a break.

 So the story remains - missed tackles is all that counts when evaluating player performance and if that cannot be used in the case of forwards add distances gained and defenders beaten.   If that does not add up just misrepresent instances during matches and bob is your uncle -  you have all the answers to meet the requirements of prejudice. 

Review I read said that he replaced an injured Heaslip at 8, gave him a 7 ranking, saying he wus alraait. Nuffink on MOM.

The two players discussed as MOM candidates were Sexton, who would have been my pick and O' Mahony who was the MOM...not Stampkar

 So are we dealing with Fake news?  

 Whenever I see a posting of Mozart - the name Willem Albert come to the fore.   How Mozart can support Alberts all-out is a serious mystery to me.   He support a prop pretending to be a loosie and denigrate all other loosies because he is prejudiced against them.  
Instead of being ashamed of his rugby ignorance he broadcast it all over the Board and use misrepresentations and selected portion of stats to justify his stat ements - stupid and really misleading.    

 Whenever I see a posting of Mozart - the name Willem Albert come to the fore.   How Mozart can support Alberts all-out is a serious mystery to me.   He support a prop pretending to be a loosie and denigrate all other loosies because he is prejudiced against them.  
Instead of being ashamed of his rugby ignorance he broadcast it all over the Board and use misrepresentations and selected portion of stats to justify his stat ements - stupid and really misleading.    

I look inside myself and see my heart is black . I see my red door and must have it painted black . Maybe then I'll fade away and not have to face the facts . It's not easy facing up when your whole world is black

 Another stupid response from the chief of the Village Idiots. 

 Dave has the following dislikes and he constantly denigrate the same players.   The players he constantly attack - sometimes under total misrepresentations of what happened are -
CJ StanderJan SerfonteinJohann GoosenPieter-Stef du ToitPat LambieJaco KrielFrans MalherbeLappies LabuschagneWarren WhiteleyFaf de Klerk



The number of negative threads he started on those players will fill a book and one cannot ever hope to get realistic comments on the above players out of him.
An easy example is the lie that Goosen bottled out under high balls.   If a player jump for a high kicked ball and miss the catch does not mean he bottled out.   There was not a single case where it happened - but Mozart does not mind to make a total misrepresentation.  
But then his heroes are Morne Steyn, Fat Fransie Steyn, Willem Alberts and Willemse.   The reason is he wants to move Etzebeth to 5 and bring in Willemse at 4 - all to get rid of Du Toit.   You may have missed his recent praise songs about those players and then he also think that Flippie should come back as a lock.  Flippie had his opportunities and never made the grade.
But then what can one think about lack of insight when he called Matfield as a dominant lock.   Matfield was good in line-outs - but a dominant lock he never was.  
 
 

Duplication  







.  
 
 

Dave just two small points: ... Step did beat the SD wing with a step. But the SD fullback totally skinned him for pace. .... Secondly Stampkar didn't make metres with every run, when your gain is 1.3 metres per carry, there have to be a few runs in your 20 attempts where you made no metres. .... The obsession with Stamkar baffles me. A guy like Deysel who we eventually discarded was a way more potent runner. Hell even the rusty Vunipola doubled his metres per run in a losing cause. Perhaps you can explain to me what he does apart from carrying the ball up many times and getting dropped by the first defender. As I said, I'm baffled.

 Same as I am baffled with your addiction to Alberts who was/is a worse ball carrier than Stander and he is useless in all other aspects of loosie play as well.  
By the way Stander is in the Team of the 6-Nations as per Planet R ugby - so more egg is coming your way

Rocky burst in, and grinning a grin, . He said, "Danny boy, this is a showdown". . But Daniel was hot, he drew first and shot, . And Rocky collapsed in the corner.

  Ag Kak = get real for a change - you are supposed top be an adult.

Clean up your act and I'll treat you like an adult, don't and I'll treat you like the obsessed joke you are.

  Sorry Mozart - but you are the one to clean up tour act.   Prejudice and seriously questionable stories you are spread on this site is what is the order of the day.    When somebody point out you have lied about things - you claim it is your personal opinion.   However to form an opinion based on falsification of facts is not the sign of maturity.  
So YOU must start acting like a grown-up and not a ten-year old.   Nobody  can discuss anything about Rugby with you on this site without the BS flowing like lava from your mouth.  
Once you start debating issues without your  twists and turns based on your own fabrications a logical debate will be possible.        

Duplication .  

I don't have to do anything Pervert, it's you who is asking.

  You are lost is a sea of lies and deception and that accounts for your childishness.    I am sick and tired of the rubbish you reduce this site to.  

No doubt things wouldn't look so bleak if you were better at Make Believe Rugby. Sadly that is a remore prospect.

 At least I do not lie about what actually happened on the field of play.   That I leave to you - it clearly is your preserve/  

You don't lie...that's rich .....here's one. Keep niggling and I'll post more.... ... ...... Liar Tokkie eat MCaw crow 12 November 10, 2015, 06:20:44 Back in 2013 Tokkie writes this "Now for the bad one insofar as new Zealand players are concerned:- * McCa played - but was by far the worst player in the AB side bearing in mind his stats as well." "Now back to McCaw - sorry, but he is missing more tackles than ever before. In the Ellis Park test he made 13 tackles - missing 5. That is a 24,5% missed tackle ratio. Reason - despite all the shouting and screaming of the AB fans - it is a sign of decline in his performances." "Can you now understand my response now - but as I said - have fun with a declining McCaw - the longer he plays for the AB's the more beneficial it is for the Springboks".:D:D:D And then in 2015 he says this "Here I have a problem. Conrad Smith is not what he used to be, but likely to be captain. Williams is playing on-and-off rugby and his defense was so-so in Super 15, while his off-loads were excellent. Nonu is in the same category as Conrad Smith. It is with some hesitation that I write down what I really think." And this "I have highlighted the players I am thinking should be the first choice in the various positions and put those I would not touch with a bargepole last on the list of players in each position." No 7 Sam Cane, Michael Todd, Akira Ioane, Richie McCaw No 6 But then having written all that negative stuff about the AB vets, and I'm just scratching the surface today he says this: "The same cannot be said about the AB's players mentioned - they never were sub-par in form like the so-called Springbok vets were. What a comparison by a deluded mind whose idea of form is non-existent." And there are some fools on this site who take him seriously...liar is an inadequate word. Edit post 0 Likes Denny Status: Rugby Legend Posts: 4754 RE: Liar Tokkie eat MCaw crow 12 November 10, 2015, 06:36:20 Oh Dear.....sauce please. 0 Likes

 Mozart
You lie - I quoted facts.   Take the above quotes - all contain facts and reasons for my comments. 
The problem was I highlighted the problems with the aging players in the AB's and last years AB team was in fact an improvement on the AB team of 2015 .
You could not take it because of your age mania.   Go on try and find some cases where I lied about match situations and occurrences like you do regularly.     

'I wont touch with a bargepole.....Richie McCaw'......2013 . 'The same cannot be said about the AB players mentioned- they never were sub-par in form like the so-called Springbok vets'.......2015 . A straight forward lie to protect yourself.....case closed.

 I guarantee you this much ,Maccaw would die rather than allow the Irish to win one against him .He knows how to get that last little bit from himself and his boys ,and his last year was a truly mighty effort .

 Old Tokkie was having his standard go against McCaw in 2013. Never an older hero Tokkie can't find fault with.....and then he lies about it in 2015. ... McCaw is the first player one would select if you had access to all the rugby players in every country since 2000......whether he was 25 or 30 years old.

 Mozart
That was not a lie - it was an opinion based on factual performance by McCaw.   I did not lie like you do about match occurrences.  
  

When you said McCaw was somebody you wouldn't touch with a bargepole.....that was an opinion. When you then said the AB veterans were never-sub par in form you lied......you claimed they were sub par in the first statement.

 Mozart
you cannot prove that I lied.  I was expressing an opinion on some player and stated they were not the players they used to be.   I quoted the stats from the 2014 Johannesburg test and wen on to look at the way De Allende and Kriel played the fool with Nonu and Smith in another test - so much so that Nonu was replaced early in that test.
However, you cannot ever look at matches objectively - so you would have lost out on those examples comprehensively. 
In any event the age mania took over in your case
And next is why all your lies - outright lies - like the issue of Goosen making a weak try-saving tackle - him bottling under high kicks which never happen, the outright lie about De Allende missing a tackle on Kuridrani by giving a totally inaccurate account what happened.    The lie about Morne Steyn's kick in Perth and equating it with a penalty missed by Lambie and saying the circumstances were the same.  And then there was the stupidity of showing a video clip after you claimed the tackle in the WC semi of De Allende  on Nonu did not happen.
I can go on and quote virtually every description by you of occurrences in matches  is falsified and not an opinion - but deliberate misrepresentations and lies.   There are endless examples of those and to read your version is absolutely false. 
You are a total fool that do not understand rugby as a game and it is becoming clearer by the day.        

 Mozart
you cannot prove that I lied.  I was expressing an opinion on some player and stated they were not the players they used to be.   I quoted the stats from the 2014 Johannesburg test and wen on to look at the way De Allende and Kriel played the fool with Nonu and Smith in another test - so much so that Nonu was replaced early in that test.
However, you cannot ever look at matches objectively - so you would have lost out on those examples comprehensively. 
In any event the age mania took over in your case
And next is why all your lies - outright lies - like the issue of Goosen making a weak try-saving tackle - him bottling under high kicks which never happen, the outright lie about De Allende missing a tackle on Kuridrani by giving a totally inaccurate account what happened.    The lie about Morne Steyn's kick in Perth and equating it with a penalty missed by Lambie and saying the circumstances were the same.  And then there was the stupidity of showing a video clip after you claimed the tackle in the WC semi of De Allende  on Nonu did not happen.
I can go on and quote virtually every description by you of occurrences in matches  is falsified and not an opinion - but deliberate misrepresentations and lies.   There are endless examples of those and to read your version is absolutely false. 
You are a total fool that do not understand rugby as a game and it is becoming clearer by the day.        

 It was an obvious lie...how is your Pretend Rugby Competition going. LMAOFY!

 The laughter is on my side.  We all know by now that you have no idea about rugby and advance level of dishonesty iro  the game.  So the laughter is on my side - you have enhanced rugby stupidy to a level so ridiculous that it can lead to two alternatives  namely to cry out of pity or to laugh at idiocy displayed.   I chose to laugh.