FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Wallaby loss moves England to third in IRB ranking

Wallaby loss moves England to third in IRB ranking

Started by Monkey D Luffy15 REPLIES495 VIEWS· 21 Aug 2013, 00:58
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
21 Aug 2013, 00:58
#1
21 Aug 2013, 00:58#1
Wallaby loss moves England to third in IRB ranking

England have moved up to third place in the IRB Rankings without kicking a ball

England have moved up to third place in the IRB Rugby World rankings as a result of Australia's loss to New Zealand in the Rugby Championship.

 

The first placed New Zealand and second placed South Africa did not change position but strengthened their positions with victories over the Wallabies and Argentina's Pumas in the opening round of the Rugby championship.

 

While Australia paid a price for their 29-47 loss to New Zealand the result allowed England to break the southern hemisphere dominance of the top three.

 

The Wallabies could have climbed to second had they beaten New Zealand at ANZ Stadium, but the margin of defeat in Ewen McKenzie’s first game in charge sees them fall below England by just over three tenths of a rating point.

 

With South Africa unable to improve their rating despite overwhelming Argentina 73-13 in Soweto, New Zealand’s cushion at the top - a position they have occupied since 16 November 2009 - has grown to 4.52 rating points.

 

South Africa went into the match at FNB Stadium sitting eight places and 10.36 rating points above Los Pumas, which meant that regardless of the margin of victory it would not have any impact on their rating in second place.

 

The only other change in the latest IRB World Rankings sees Canada climb one place to 14th - swapping place with Japan - after their 27-9 victory over USA in the first leg of the Rugby World Cup 2015 qualifier to determine the Americas 1 side at England 2015.

 

Canada now lie just under a point behind Fiji above them going into the second leg in Toronto this weekend, while despite the heavy loss on home soil, the USA Eagles remain 18th and still have a cushion of nearly three points over Russia below.

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
21 Aug 2013, 01:01
#2
21 Aug 2013, 01:01#2

wowsers, robbie deans worked so hard to get the wallabies from 5th place when he took over to 3rd place and keeping in mind that most of deans tenure the wallabies were ranked 2nd only just falling to 3rd place last year to the Boks. and now mackenzie has taken the wallabies to 4th place in one game, o_O tsk tsk tsk tsk tsk tsk tsk.
how embarassing. wonder how that so called kiwi record of links is holding up now, LMAO, :oD

some interesting FYIs regarding world rankings and the SANZAR teams,,,

current IRB rank
All Blacks - #1
Boks - #2
wallabies - #4

worst IRB rank
All Blacks - #3 (for a total of one 5 days back in 2003, 15/11/03-20/11/03)
Boks - #6
wallabies - #5

All Blacks have also been IRBs No1 team for almost 85%of the time, more then 4 times longer then england and the Boks combined who are the only other nations to ever be considered No1.

and no my saffa brus, im not smiriking, this is my default expression, :oP

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
21 Aug 2013, 01:17
#3
21 Aug 2013, 01:17#3

Greetings Sasuke san; yes & as the article says:

"With South Africa unable to improve their rating despite overwhelming Argentina 73-13 in Soweto, New Zealand’s cushion at the top - a position they have occupied since 16 November 2009 - has grown to 4.52 rating points."

If we were chest-beating as someone on this site claims then it would be understandable because a team recently beat Argies & a few of their fans have been hyper ventilating ever since. But we have been humble kiwis who respect their team and honour a win.

Tes, most nations would be chest-beating if they could achieve this record, eg. Poms , Oz & maybe even the mighty Boks but not us, we are  just trying to get better each week and also  improve our depth.

Come on Beeno1, we know you are nervous about the ABs but be strong & let us have your counter arguments.We are laughing in anticipation, 

RE
redsmanPro1,710 posts
21 Aug 2013, 04:42
#4
21 Aug 2013, 04:42#4
From what I've read this counts for nothing now the RWC pools have been finalised. I guess if the kiwis feel better that they are number 1 out of lets face it 4 or 5 competitive countries who play rugby - well done. After all it really is the only sport that kiwis play... I think the saffas as passionate as they are about rugby do lack the administrative advantages that kiwis no doubt enjoy - reference new 2014 quota/s for example. As for Aussies - Robbie's legacy is clearly at play here - it is completely irrational to say that Link is responsible for this after one game (surely you can even see that susker).......... Link will take probably till end of year tour to really establish his culture and get players to gel is my prediction.
RU
RugganutClub Pro183 posts
22 Aug 2013, 08:11
#5
22 Aug 2013, 08:11#5

Wales do not deserve to be behind England and France in 6th Place. France were wooden spooners and got hammered by the Kiwis. They also taught England a lesson in the final game of 6 nations to win it.

 

Where is the logic ?

RE
redsmanPro1,710 posts
22 Aug 2013, 08:46
#6
22 Aug 2013, 08:46#6
@rugganut you may not need to look further than marketing / Return On Investment and RWC - it all comes down to $$ and wouldn't be surprised that by having Wales placed where they were helped with the RWC pools in some way... Mind you Aussies pretty much dominated the Welsh 6/7 times? I recall in recent clashes and to go up the rankings you have to beat the teams in 1st or 2nd place - hence Englands rise as they smashed the kiwis last year.
MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
22 Aug 2013, 09:15
#7
22 Aug 2013, 09:15#7

poor wallabies, one game with that tub of lard mackenzie and theyre already in 4th place, :o(

two questions i cant help but wonder,,,
1 - if this is what mackenzie can do in one game, what can he do in 10 games???

2 - where will mackenzie be coaching after the 2015 RWC??? we all know the wallies wont amount to much except maybe a better head to head over the Boks.

at least aussietubby has learned to shut his mouth now and stop talking so much smack, was very lippy until hansen gave him a good backhand in sydeny, lolz, :oD

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
22 Aug 2013, 09:24
#8
22 Aug 2013, 09:24#8

@ruggernaut,

the ranking system is flawed, its very easy to move up on the ladder, but not so making any head way when ur on the top.

All Blacks may have beaten at the tim 5th place france, but they got zero points for it cos the french were ranked too low, while the french were playing a higher ranked team in NZ, it means they lost no points, even though they got smashed..

the ranking system is designed to keep teams on a level pegging, its why eng got a huge bump of their win against the All Blacks, despite only winning 50% of their games in 2012.

it puts some prespective into just how awesome the All Blacks have been, when u see some of the FYI IRB ranking records i posted in my earloer post.

RU
RugganutClub Pro183 posts
22 Aug 2013, 12:43
#9
22 Aug 2013, 12:43#9

This is the IRB's explination.

 

The IRB World Rankings are calculated using a 'Points Exchange' system, in which sides take points off each other based on the match result. Whatever one side gains, the other loses.

The exchanges are based on the match result, the relative strength of each team, and the margin of victory, and there is an allowance for home advantage.

Points exchanges are doubled during the World Cup Finals to recognise the unique importance of this event, but all other full international matches are treated the same, to be as fair as possible to countries playing a different mix of friendly and competitive matches across the world.

Any match that is not a full international between two member countries does not count at all.

All member countries have a rating, typically between 0 and 100. The top side in the world will normally have a rating above 90.
 

 

Sponsored by Adidas

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
22 Aug 2013, 12:47
#10
22 Aug 2013, 12:47#10

"Any match that is not a full international between two member countries does not count at all."

so what exactly is not a full inetrnational match??? o_O

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
22 Aug 2013, 14:48
#11
22 Aug 2013, 14:48#11

 

Yeah … ol Porkie Pig had much to say about whom he’d pick … then when push came to shove he ended up benching the useless Cooper anyway … so much for that.

 

He’s playing O’Connor out of position … Folau is being taken out of the game by smart All Black play … Mogg isn’t doing it at all in the 15 jersey … while Toomua has shown he’s not a test 10. His backline is a disaster.

 

Now I see Old Porkie’s threatening his boys. He stuffs up with team selections and blames his boys for the result..

 

What an ass!!!

 

I guess he must be feeling a little stupid after all the talk about beating the All blacks and bringing the cup back to ozzie shores.

 

Think they shoulda left Deans in charge.

 

 

NJ
njRookie31 posts
22 Aug 2013, 15:14
#12
22 Aug 2013, 15:14#12

Trust a kiwi to somehow make an article about Aus ranking status suddenly all about the ABs, and then for another one to claim they're being humble whilst doing it. Guess they've been smoking the silver ferns again...   

RE
redsmanPro1,710 posts
23 Aug 2013, 07:21
#13
23 Aug 2013, 07:21#13
Well said NJ.... a welcome voice of reason to the forum. The kiwis do like to highlight the fact that have beaten Aussies in rugby even though few people follow the sport in Australia....... anyway I've learnt just to let them have their moment as they obviously have a few self-esteem issues..... as for Suscker above - you have just completely contradicted yourself in your two posts - you say: "the ranking system is flawed, its very easy to move up on the ladder, but not so making any head way when ur on the top." hahaah you sir are a kiwi clown..........
RU
RugganutClub Pro183 posts
23 Aug 2013, 13:33
#14
23 Aug 2013, 13:33#14

Cleancut stay with the subject or start a new thread or just put you brain in a liquidiser, if you have one.

 

Can anyone find out how many points Wales gained by beating England handsomely in the final game of 6 nations. This was an all or nothing game and played at Twickenham. If i remember correctly they had to win by 7 and won by 20.

 

I am not a Wales pusher but love their brand of Rugby (aka Cheetahs styleeeee), they supplied most of the Lions whom out played the Aussies (i know this does not count for ranking points) but Wales did well at the RWC and won the 6 nations. To be below France (wooden spooners) and England is just a farce.

As the IRB almost admits, the system is not ideal (meaning is not a fair reflection). Then find a solution to your crap on offer.

BE
becsPro4,378 posts
23 Aug 2013, 16:08
#15
23 Aug 2013, 16:08#15

We didn't play at Twickers, we played in Cardiff.

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
24 Aug 2013, 00:32
#16
24 Aug 2013, 00:32#16

@ruggernaut,

before the wales v england 6nats in cardiff, the IRB ranking was,,,
wales ranked #5 on 81.78
eng ranked #4 on 81.78

after the 30-3 beatdown that wales gave england, the rankings between the two stayed the same, but the points were,,,
wales - 83.36
england - 83.72

what the red dragons accomplished in the 6nats or RWC has nopthing to do with them sitting behind enlgand or france, its that loss to japan in their last test which really hurt them, if they hadnt lost that match, they would still be neck and neck with england right now and ahead of france.
mean while during the same period england beating the pumas at the same time saw their ranking continue to rise,

before the 6nats began, wales were sitting on 9pts, so the reality is they have made huge inroads to be where they are since the start of the year

@redsneck,
in the words of that trannybot on furturama, why u so stupid, stupid??? LMAO, :oP

it is easy to move up on the ladder, look at wales and england, but when ur ranked higher then the teams u play, its very hard to make any kind of headway, or at least widen the gap, kapish??? of course not, too many words with more then one syllable, o_O

hope ur new friend sticks around, but like u after the reds and wallabies, he will disappear as quickly as a chest beatiing yellow wallaby, :o)

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news