FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  What it will cost to dump Coetzee

What it will cost to dump Coetzee

Started by Devil's Advocate7 REPLIES227 VIEWS· 05 Dec 2016, 08:12
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
05 Dec 2016, 08:12
#1
05 Dec 2016, 08:12#1

From news24:


Hendrik Cronjé


-

Cape Town - It will cost the SA Rugby Union (Saru) almost R13 million to get rid of current coach Allister Coetzee.

The Springbok coach needs to explain his record of only winning four out of 12 Test matches to Saru’s high-performance committee on December 13.

While Coetzee does not have a performance clause for his first year as Bok coach, there is great unhappiness among Saru members because South Africa does not feature among the top five rugby nations in the world.

There is also still uncertainty whether Coetzee will stay on as coach after a nightmare season, but a decisive answer to this will only come early next year.

A special Saru annual and board meeting will be held in Cape Town on Friday.

The high-performance committee, which earlier this year recommended Coetzee as the right candidate for the coaching position to replace Heyneke Meyer, is made up of Kevin de Klerk, James Stoffberg, Francois Davids and Pat Kuhn.

The committee will make recommendations to the executive committee after its meeting with Coetzee.

The executive committee will then make a recommendation to Saru’s general counsel.

City Press understands that Coetzee earns, apart from his R4.2m salary, a bonus for every Test won. However, given the Boks’ woeful performance this year, those earnings are significantly less than the R6m he earned at Japanese club Kobelco Steelers.

In Coetzee’s favour is the fact that Saru and its unions are currently experiencing a financial squeeze.

Unless Saru receives financial aid from a private company or the government, it will probably not get rid of Coetzee and the majority of his management team.

Qualified successors to Coetzee include Rassie Erasmus, Johan Ackermann, Franco Smith and John Plumtree – but they will cost Saru millions because they are already contracted elsewhere.

Meanwhile, the constitution committee of Saru wants to change the rules so that the 14 presidents and executive managers will no longer have a say in the appointment of the Springbok coach.

If the committee gets its way, only the executive committee – Mark Alexander, Davids, Stoffberg, Boet Fick, Ilhaam Groenewald, Mputumi Damani, Kuhn, Tobie Titus, Vivian Lottering, Jurie Roux, Boebie Saban and Vanessa Doble – will decide on the national coach.

The ructions around the appointment of Coetzee, when the general counsel pushed for his appointment while the executive committee wanted Erasmus as coach, is the major driving force behind this move.

This will be discussed at the meeting on Friday.

Other items on the agenda include:

. Saru’s budget approval;

. A recommendation for a new Currie Cup format for 2017 of six premier league and nine first league teams;

. Saru wants private investors to own up to a 74% share of unions

DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
05 Dec 2016, 08:14
#2
05 Dec 2016, 08:14#2

Pathetic


No performance clause?


What position is there currently in any sphere of business does not have this clause.....


R13 million to get rid of the main problem...... lost for words   

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
05 Dec 2016, 08:40
#3
05 Dec 2016, 08:40#3





Pathetic
Coetzee is only part of the problem and may seem like the main problem, I'm saying SARU is the main problem including the high performance committee.

BO
BokBFClub Pro421 posts
05 Dec 2016, 10:18
#4
05 Dec 2016, 10:18#4
 Now that's an oxymoron ... SARU and the high performance committee.
Coetzee does not have the clause because he is the correct colour. It is just another example of SARU's incompetence & failure at every level.     
DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
05 Dec 2016, 10:59
#5
05 Dec 2016, 10:59#5

I agree with BokBF


However, even being an affirmative position, what company would hire anyone for that term, and for that amount of money, with no performance contract.


Note though, that it says only for his "first year"


Now is that to give him time to make whatever changes he deems fit, and then exempt him from any performance related disciplinary issues?.


Either way, his first year is basically up, so I wonder what the excuses will be after this year

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
05 Dec 2016, 14:30
#6
05 Dec 2016, 14:30#6
 I think SARU is trying to flog 75% of the Super Rugby franchises ownership to private buyers.   That would ensure that they get extra money and would also cause an upgrade of their financial situation  - that is if they can get buyers. 
Private ownership will be the end of some of our coaches and the firing of Coetzee  and a replacement by a competent coach will be the only way to draw in private ownership into the system.
Hope there are five buyers who would be interested - I can think of Rupert spending a bit of his pocket money in the case of the Stormers  and perhaps Emirates in the case of the Lions.  The problem will be with the other  three franchises. 
What is absolutely sure is that nobody will spend anything on the Kings.    
BO
BokBFClub Pro421 posts
05 Dec 2016, 15:03
#7
05 Dec 2016, 15:03#7
 I could stretch to £1 for the Kings just to change their name to the Zuma's Queens 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
05 Dec 2016, 16:03
#8
05 Dec 2016, 16:03#8
 
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news